SaintsH8 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I'm pretty sure that everyone here has seen Pat Y's tops NFCS players. The list has been horrible, but today he completely lost it putting Stewart in front of guys like Colston and White. The guy has never even started a full season, and he never even taken the full load. This list is weak. I would say that Colston means more to the saints than than Jenkins imho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Well he might be looking at roles Colston and White will play this season. If the Saints find a solid running game as they began to last season. Then Colstons role would drop. Same for White as Jones, HD and Rodgers etc get more touches and are targeted more.They may not be as much a impact as they used to be because of the way the O is set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsH8 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 (edited) Well he might be looking at roles Colston and White will play this season. If the Saints find a solid running game as they began to last season. Then Colstons role would drop. Same for White as Jones, HD and Rodgers etc get more touches and are targeted more.They may not be as much a impact as they used to be because of the way the O is set up.Even if that is the case Stewart has been sharing his role his whole career, and is not going to be more productive than those two. Also the saints offense has always had many weapons for the past few years and Colston has still been very productive. Colston is an underrated player, but noway Stewart should be ahead of Colston. Edited June 28, 2012 by #1falconsfan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Thats like the NFL`s top 100. Things dont make sense, but thats the way the list came out. You try and justify it and in the end. Its just a list. Maybe he is just a fan of that player and thinks he will have a break out year?I doubt he discredits the Value of Coston or White... But hard to say why he went that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsH8 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 Thats like the NFL`s top 100. Things dont make sense, but thats the way the list came out. You try and justify it and in the end. Its just a list. Maybe he is just a fan of that player and thinks he will have a break out year?I doubt he discredits the Value of Coston or White... But hard to say why he went that way.I believe that he use to be the beat writer for the Panthers back in the day, but I may be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAINTSfan Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I believe that he use to be the beat writer for the Panthers back in the day, but I may be wrong.your right about being the beat writer for Carolina. He also lived in Florida and i believe he covered the Bucs too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st. diehard Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 If the Saints find a solid running game as they began to last season. Then Colstons role would drop. They WERE a solid 6th in rushing last season as well as in 09. Both seasons, Colston's role was #1 WR and unaffected. I don't see why 12 would be any different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xyfiel Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Pat was never born with it, will never have it, and it slightly below Jemele Hill in quality journalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borat Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Pat was never born with it, will never have it, and it slightly below Jemele Hill in quality journalism.Ouch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsH8 Posted June 29, 2012 Author Share Posted June 29, 2012 They WERE a solid 6th in rushing last season as well as in 09. Both seasons, Colston's role was #1 WR and unaffected. I don't see why 12 would be any different.Exactly I don't understand how someone who splits carries will have more of an impact than someone who takes almost all the snaps and is producing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bubba Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Stewart is the one that makes you question Pat Y?What about Beason at 21? With Pat Y's claim that he expects Beason to be back to the dominant player he was before the injury?If he had questions about whether or not Beason could be the Beast again, I could dig that... If he thinks Beason is going to be 100% this year...... then 21? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsH8 Posted June 29, 2012 Author Share Posted June 29, 2012 Stewart is the one that makes you question Pat Y?What about Beason at 21? With Pat Y's claim that he expects Beason to be back to the dominant player he was before the injury?If he had questions about whether or not Beason could be the Beast again, I could dig that... If he thinks Beason is going to be 100% this year...... then 21?I agree Beason should be higher on the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb 3.0 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Thanks for sharing.Get lost, or better yet head back over to TATF, they LOVE lil' girls like you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S y c o L a Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Stewart is the one that makes you question Pat Y?What about Beason at 21? With Pat Y's claim that he expects Beason to be back to the dominant player he was before the injury?If he had questions about whether or not Beason could be the Beast again, I could dig that... If he thinks Beason is going to be 100% this year...... then 21?where would you put him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts