King Syrup Golden 32 Oz Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 (edited) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74kyUhRsLBc&feature=youtu.be"Last night an eyewitness to the Trayvon Martin killing appeared on CNN and unleashed more damning evidence against the police. Speaking to Ashleigh Banfield, the face-obscured witness said that when the cops brought her in for questioning, she offered to show them the scene of the crime and explain exactly what happened—she saw the "larger man" attacking "the boy"—the police declined her offer. Not only that, but they suggested that she was wrong: that Zimmerman was the one calling for help, not Martin." "the fight took place on the grass FOUR FEET away from concrete Edited April 9, 2012 by Stylo 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronBallsMcGinty Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 The first national stories about this case reported that the police "corrected" witness statements. Not sure how that detail has been dropped since then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 The first national stories about this case reported that the police "corrected" witness statements. Not sure how that detail has been dropped since then.I don't think its the police's job to " correct " witness statements. which may be the point you are making here, hard to tell. And how would the police know who was screaming when they were not there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOzOne Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 There were also earlier reports that the detective interviewing Zimmerman at the scene was asking him "yes/no" questions, lending themselves to correct answers. For example: "Did he attack you?", "Were you defending yourself?" as opposed to "What happened here?" and letting the killer explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 There were also earlier reports that the detective interviewing Zimmerman at the scene was asking him "yes/no" questions, lending themselves to correct answers. For example: "Did he attack you?", "Were you defending yourself?" as opposed to "What happened here?" and letting the killer explain.Im surprised they were,t asking him " that kid attacked you, right?" " you had to defend yourself, correct?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swami57 Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 The first thing they should have done is tested the sidewalk for blood evidence to see if Zimmerman's story held water. I imagine the FBI has done this after the fact but who knows what that will prove at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Syrup Golden 32 Oz Posted April 9, 2012 Author Share Posted April 9, 2012 The first thing they should have done is tested the sidewalk for blood evidence to see if Zimmerman's story held water. I imagine the FBI has done this after the fact but who knows what that will prove at this point.From the outside in... there's been a lot of [roddy white] dropped balls [/roddy white] by Sanford. Makes the mind boggle...Can a police department really be this inept? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.