tobyd77 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 According to the numbers by PFF the Falcons have every right to rely on the front four to get to the QB. When you are getting according to PFF a 186 pressures/hurries 47 hits you should be able to join the 40 club in sack totals. My belief is the scheme which into does not allow the front to get off the ball quicker to get more pressures or sacks on the QB.That's what I think but I will let you talk it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconsrus Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Nolan will hone the blade I hope we wiffed alot so glad mm and bvg are gone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcanuck Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 You start too many threads for the sake of starting threads. Yes, our scheme was poor. We dropped everyone he had into weak zones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioisCoolio Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 That playing the CB 10 yards off crap allows the QB to get rid of the ball quicker if he has to as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durrtay Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 You start too many threads for the sake of starting threads. Yes, our scheme was poor. We dropped everyone he had into weak zones.This, the terrible prose, bad English, and poor execution of a thin thesis is wearisome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Man21 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 You start too many threads for the sake of starting threads. Yes, our scheme was poor. We dropped everyone he had into weak zones.There's no such thing as too many threads on this message board lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcanuck Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 There's no such thing as too many threads on this message board lol.Too many threads by the same poster asking the same rhetorical and "un-thought-provoking" questions is possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobyd77 Posted April 8, 2012 Author Share Posted April 8, 2012 You start too many threads for the sake of starting threads. Yes, our scheme was poor. We dropped everyone he had into weak zones.you are more than welcome not to respond to either one.and give me a thread that I just threw up that was a waste.and no disrespect but how many havr you started?and noone else is even talking about what I want to talk about and since I have the power to post topics I choose to use mine.u should be able to do the same now too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ltstorm2 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Too many threads by the same poster asking the same rhetorical and "un-thought-provoking" questions is possible.Would you like for me to call 911 for you? Its obvious that someone has forced you to click this thread and read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.