Swift&Change Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 The trade can be looked upon as 2 ways ...Long term success and short term but the short term dividends Im going to put as a LOSS ..I cant sit here and say to myself 1 game where if we didnt have Julio Jones we would have lost ..Not 1 and that says a lot about things but it also says to me that the move wasnt worth the short term returns ..Also did not help us be EXPLOSIVE in playoffs. Julio has good chance to turn out to be a all time player the skill level is there but short term of trade has failed..Now I see the point of the article..That Mike Wallace would come more expensive then hat we are paying Julio but article also fails to point out the holes left from voided draft picks need to be filled with free agents ..Its basically a even slateMike Wallace -8 mil perHole1 - draft pickHole2-Draft pickvsJulio JonesHole1- free agent mid tier 4-6 milHole2- free agent mid tier 4-6 milMore draft picks you hold and make impact less holes you need to fill in free agency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.