XXVIII-III Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 Lies, lies, lies... regurgitated lies...http://www.atlantafalcons.com/falconstv/?video_id=1386943690001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74ice Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 everybody keeps using the Jags personnel as an excuse, but , this guy was considered a passing whiz and everyear since he has been there the Jags passing offense got worse, wheres a counterpoint to that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtybirdz10984 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 everybody keeps using the Jags personnel as an excuse, but , this guy was considered a passing whiz and everyear since he has been there the Jags passing offense got worse, wheres a counterpoint to that?cant pass without a QB or WR's to catch the ball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXVIII-III Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 cant pass without a QB or WR's to catch the ballAnd that's an acceptable argument for you to hire this guy when we have Super Bowl aspirations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtybirdz10984 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 And that's an acceptable argument for you to hire this guy when we have Super Bowl aspirations?considering what he did with a mediocre QB, WR and a stud RB yea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74ice Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 6. I think the Dirk Koetter hire in Atlanta is a nod to the fact that the Falcons wanted to throw the ball downfield more, and to improving their screen game (maybe in 2012 with Jacquizz Rogers). Koetter's not Mike Martz, but I do think he'll be more open to featuring Julio Jones and getting Matt Ryan to take three or four shots a game deep.7. I think this shouldn't be a sign that Mike Mularkey wasn't a good hire in Jacksonville, because Mularkey is smart and a good quarterback teacher. But as the Falcons offensive coordinator he'd hit a wall with Matt Ryan, and the Falcons needed to make a change, and I believe if he wouldn't have gotten the head-coaching job with the Jags, the Falcons would have strongly considered making a change at the coordinator spot.Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/peter_king/01/16/divisionals/index.html#ixzz1jdga1hOZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl927 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 everybody keeps using the Jags personnel as an excuse, but , this guy was considered a passing whiz and everyear since he has been there the Jags passing offense got worse, wheres a counterpoint to that?A passing whiz without a passer is fairly useless. I suppose that's the only possible counterpoint to be made.As to the OP, I don't see lies. Blank wants rings, and he has certain ideas about how to get them. I may disagree with the methods. I don't doubt the desire. The NFL has changed. Blame the change on the new officiating, but the passing attack wins the games these days. The trend will strengthen under Goodell. We have no choice but to go with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faithful Falcon Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 The OC can't go out and play the game. The game still has to be played by the players. Kill all of this BS about he can't win the Super Bowl. You guys are like those men with pretty wives, but you can't tell, because you are too busy looking at the next chick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince78 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 A passing whiz without a passer is fairly useless. I suppose that's the only possible counterpoint to be made.It is kind of like cheez-whiz. You take out the cheez and all you have is whiz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Bill Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 The check is in the mail. You will get it any day now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXVIII-III Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 The check is in the mail. You will get it any day now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.