Falconcheff Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Something I just remembered I wanted to bring up...Since when has the rule changed back to it being okay to take your helmet off on the playing field in front of a ref...Saw DeMarcus Ware do it right in front of a ref last week (after a bad call, mind you), and no word from anybody. I've seen it happen before too, and not get called.Is it no longer a penalty?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon Man™ Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 What about when Dunta did it against Tampa? I know he got a personal foul prior to that for the hit, but would taking off his helmet warrant another penalty? How does that work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Something I just remembered I wanted to bring up...Since when has the rule changed back to it being okay to take your helmet off on the playing field in front of a ref...Saw DeMarcus Ware do it right in front of a ref last week (after a bad call, mind you), and no word from anybody. I've seen it happen before too, and not get called.Is it no longer a penalty??I think they got away from that one because I see players do it all the time now. But nice toknow you are watching the Cowboys games so closely! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe horn Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 I haven't been keeping track but I thought it was fine during timeouts, end of periods, and changes of possessions? Or have these incidents been outside of these parameters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falconcheff Posted January 5, 2012 Author Share Posted January 5, 2012 (edited) I think they got away from that one because I see players do it all the time now.But nice toknow you are watching the Cowboys games so closely!Actually, I was watching the Giants game, and the Cowboys happened to be the team they were smashing...Considering the rule was implemented because of a Cowboy's shenanigans, I'm surprised they don't enforce it against those rulebreakers Edited January 5, 2012 by Falconcheff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Actually, I was watching the Giants game, and the Cowboys happened to be the team they were smashing...Considering the rule was implemented because of a Cowboy's shenanigans, I'm surprised they don't enforce it against those rulebreakers bUT... BUT I thought the league loved and favored the Cowboys.. now they make rules specifically against them? Any chance of a scat rule named after Ryan? And...If that was a " smash" can I get your description of the last NO/Atlanta game? Im quite the linguaphile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falconcheff Posted January 5, 2012 Author Share Posted January 5, 2012 bUT... BUT I thought the league loved and favored the Cowboys.. now they make rules specifically against them? Any chance of a scat rule named after Ryan?And...If that was a " smash" can I get your description of the last NO/Atlanta game? Im quite the linguaphile. Sure. "FLUKE"Carry on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Sure. "FLUKE"Carry on...I thought sweep would be closer than fluke.record setting even, with Brees at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe horn Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Sure. "FLUKE"Carry on...Man, how do you mangle a word as easy as TREND? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyCo Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 bUT... BUT I thought the league loved and favored the Cowboys.. now they make rules specifically against them? Any chance of a scat rule named after Ryan?And...If that was a " smash" can I get your description of the last NO/Atlanta game? Im quite the linguaphile.Giants smashed cowboys? nah, I wouldn't say that. The eagles smashed the cowboys. The giants just kicked em around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Do Itch Big Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Sure. "FLUKE"Carry on...LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe horn Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 "Smashed" sets just too impersonal a tone for what was done to ATL in the Superdome. From the owner all the way down to the fans, they got straight up violated with a strap-on that had "SOBRIETY" stenciled on the shaft./compulsively CBDevilish unsolicited sexual metahpor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconKillerz Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 "Smashed" sets just too impersonal a tone for what was done to ATL in the Superdome. From the owner all the way down to the fans, they got straight up violated with a strap-on that had "SOBRIETY" stenciled on the shaft./compulsively CBDevilish unsolicited sexual metahporAint' that the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Giants smashed cowboys? nah, I wouldn't say that. The eagles smashed the cowboys. The giants just kicked em aroundkinda like TJ yates did the Falcons. Just kicked em around a bit....In his first NFL start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyCo Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 kinda like TJ yates did the Falcons. Just kicked em around a bit....In his first NFL start.yea like that, he was scorching our d. 188 yards.. one... count em.... one touchdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 "Smashed" sets just too impersonal a tone for what was done to ATL in the Superdome. From the owner all the way down to the fans, they got straight up violated with a strap-on that had "SOBRIETY" stenciled on the shaft./compulsively CBDevilish unsolicited sexual metahpor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 yea like that, he was scorching our d. 188 yards.. one... count em.... one touchdown.scorched it juuuust enough to say "scoreboard!!" Thats all the guy needed in his FIRST NFL START. to go along with Mattys One... count em ONE Td and TWO..count em...TWO ints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyCo Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 scorched it juuuust enough to say "scoreboard!!" Thats all the guy needed in his FIRST NFL START.to go along with Mattys One... count em ONE Td and TWO..count em...TWO ints.Oh you were talking about Jt Yates.. Tj's twin brother who happened to be a fourth string db starting that game for the first time also, and intercepted Ryan twice.. that can be the only reason Ryan's interceptions would need to be mentioned when talking about Yates scorching the falcons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falconcheff Posted January 5, 2012 Author Share Posted January 5, 2012 (edited) I thought sweep would be closer than fluke.record setting even, with Brees at least.Well, if anyone would know the definition of "sweep" it would be the team that was swept by TWO of it's division rivals, Philly and NY, en route to a non-winning season. I'll take your knowledgeable word for it... Edited January 5, 2012 by Falconcheff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAINTSfan Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Man, how do you mangle a word as easy as TREND?TRENDING ON TWITTER: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts