Jump to content

TD should trade Turner for a proper Nickel Back and picks...


Sully45

Recommended Posts

Quizz is showing immense promise and Snelling would comfortably fill the feature-back void. Turner virtually has no upside at this point of his career, so why keep the flab?

OK, I know this will never happen. But I think it would nevertheless be a smart, very Patriots-esque move that would pay-off in the long term.

So, would you oust Turner in favour of a solid Nickel Corner and a few picks? (I'm thinking we'd receive 3rd and 4th rounders, realistically)

Edited by Sully45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

This season, absolutely not. Quizz has not taken a snap in a game. Snelling is not a feature back in my humble opinion. Why trade your 1300 yard, 10 TD back who can block expecially when we are dedicated to the running game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade Turner, who's going to be our 1000 yard, 10 TD back? Falcons are a run-first team. We need Turner. He is the reason we made the playoffs in 2008, the reason we did not make it in 2009 (injured for 5.5 games) and the reason we made it in 2010, at least a very major and large part of why we did.

Edited by JoeSr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

quizz is a beast? i didn t know he had played in regular season games. he has played against 3 and 4 stringers in the first 2 ps games. if he is to make the team i sure hope he would over a bunch of guys on defense that will be cut next week. i didn t see a whole lot of tonight s game. i will have to see the replay. but unless he was doing it against the steelers first team d, i d hold off on the beast proclamations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quizz is showing immense promise and Snelling would comfortably fill the feature-back void. Turner virtually has no upside at this point of his career, so why keep the flab?

OK, I know this will never happen. But I think it would nevertheless be a smart, very Patriots-esque move that would pay-off in the long term.

So, would you oust Turner in favour of a solid Nickel Corner and a few picks? (I'm thinking we'd receive 3rd and 4th rounders, realistically)

I like that idea IF the Falcons got a young CB coming into his prime - not another over the hill player on the downside of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quizz is a beast? i didn t know he had played in regular season games. he has played against 3 and 4 stringers in the first 2 ps games. if he is to make the team i sure hope he would over a bunch of guys on defense that will be cut next week. i didn t see a whole lot of tonight s game. i will have to see the replay. but unless he was doing it against the steelers first team d, i d hold off on the beast proclamations.

Rodgers is not a beast, but I think what the OP is suggesting is that between Rodgers and Snelling you can have at least the same production as if you kept Turner. So to cut the fat from the team while also fixing a weakness is what is being suggested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade Turner, who's going to be our 1000 yard, 10 TD back? Falcons are a run-first team. We need Turner. He is the reason we made the playoffs in 2008, the reason we did not make it in 2009 (injured for 5.5 games) and the reason we made it in 2010, at least a very major and large part of why we did.

I can see Snelling getting 1000 yards and 10 TDs easy. Turner has lost his explosion in my opinion. He is still good for those numbers but w have 2 backs now that can match those totals. If anything its a luxery to keep turner.

In games where we wanna run the ball down teams throats he will definetly tire the opposing defense. But i think as far as produciton Quizz or Snelling can match it.

He was an integral part of our 08 season and good last year but to Snelling was just as good since last season.

If we really could get a player this year i wouldnt be apposed to trading him but just for drafts picks i se no reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just do not see how Turner is on the decline as some are proclaiming. He just came off a 1371 yard, 12 TD season, great in pass protection and he is on the decline? Those are big shoes to fill, especially with the offense we run. I can understand our need for a mid-tier veteran CB, but NOT at the expense of trading Turner. You get rid of Turner for a good CB and now we have a problem at one of THE most important positions on our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers is not a beast, but I think what the OP is suggesting is that between Rodgers and Snelling you can have at least the same production as if you kept Turner. So to cut the fat from the team while also fixing a weakness is what is being suggested.

oh no, he edited his post. his first words were quizz is a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If snelling can get those numbers, why hasn't he at this point; and, why didn't any team sweep him away all that time he was available? Why aren't we hearing about him challenging Turner for the starting role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs are a dime a dozen in this league. And I think Turner's wheels are worn out. We got 1 good season out of him. I think its time to move on. Snelling is better than Turner right now.

agree 100% we got what we needed out of him he just dosent have anyy burst in his legs anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade Turner, who's going to be our 1000 yard, 10 TD back? Falcons are a run-first team. We need Turner. He is the reason we made the playoffs in 2008, the reason we did not make it in 2009 (injured for 5.5 games) and the reason we made it in 2010, at least a very major and large part of why we did.

You are assuming Turner is just as good as he was before. Most great runningbacks hit the wall about this age - 29 or later. Turner is 29 now, and it is easy to see that his best years are behind him. Turner will be hard pressed to get the same results that he had before, not to mention that Rodgers AND Snelling can catch which Turner is a liability on passing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs are a dime a dozen in this league. And I think Turner's wheels are worn out. We got 1 good season out of him. I think its time to move on. Snelling is better than Turner right now.

How so, though? And who would spell him? Quizz? I hope not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are assuming Turner is just as good as he was before. Most great runningbacks hit the wall about this age - 29 or later. Turner is 29 now, and it is easy to see that his best years are behind him. Turner will be hard pressed to get the same results that he had before, not to mention that Rodgers AND Snelling can catch which Turner is a liability on passing downs.

How many of the RB's started at age 26? Turner got a late start and came here with age but low mileage. It's not like he turns 30, and then he all of sudden just automatically declines. He has only been a starter for three seasons. Why wouldn;t I assume Turner is just as good as before? He has not proven me wrong yet. Look at his impact last season. I doubt we would have won the division without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If snelling can get those numbers, why hasn't he at this point; and, why didn't any team sweep him away all that time he was available? Why aren't we hearing about him challenging Turner for the starting role?

Because Snelling is a 27 year old RB himself and if he went to a new team he would have to learn their system. Why give the job to a 27 year old RB when you can give it to someone younger.

The thing with the Falcons is that Snelling IS the younger back in this case compared to Turner. RBs tend to have relatively SHORT careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Snelling is a 27 year old RB himself and if he went to a new team he would have to learn their system. Why give the job to a 27 year old RB when you can give it to someone younger.

The thing with the Falcons is that Snelling IS the younger back in this case compared to Turner. RBs tend to have relatively SHORT careers.

By your reasoning, we would only have Snelling for a few seasons then if he is already 27. He'll be 29 in two seasons. What has Snelling proven to the Falcon brass that he is/can be a feature back? I haven't seen it yet. Someone mentioned rbacks are a dime a dozen and there are several teams in need of a RB and no one snatched Snelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If snelling can get those numbers, why hasn't he at this point; and, why didn't any team sweep him away all that time he was available? Why aren't we hearing about him challenging Turner for the starting role?

I think the coaching staff has been hoping what we have all been hoping as well. He was great in 2008 and i think we figured since he had such low mileage he would again return to that form. But it just isnt happening I think in the regular season he will be used or should be used in short yardage and goaline.

The next couple of games just watch he dosent hit the whole with the same burst. Snelling and quizz are much better at this. And Quizz was much better in pass protection tonight against the first team defense.

If we go get a teams 2 corner to play the nickel i think it would be great move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...