Jump to content

Ross Tucker and Darren Woodson agree with us


paulitik

Recommended Posts

Well I don't get into that whole respect thing so many of our fans are into. You get what you get when you earn it in the NFL.

But, as the NFC South Champs, the holders of 3 consecutive winning seasons, and 2 playoff games in the past 3 years, the people outside our family can see we are a very serious contender. So yes, if respect is what we crave, we have finally earned some. Now we have to continue to earn it.

BTW outside the whole respect thing this year, can we avoid all that "fly under the radar" garbage?

LOL no more of that for this team. We have always wanted to run with the NFL Elite, and now we are finally there, so the spotlight is on us.

Get ready for heady praise when we win, and scorching criticism when we do not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess 6 is cool for now because all people can go by is what's on paper and on paper a lot of teams look good. I think we're gonna play better than we did last season because we improved on areas we were weak in and besides when a 13-3 team can return 19 of 22 starters that's a very good thing no matter how you slice it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess 6 is cool for now because all people can go by is what's on paper and on paper a lot of teams look good. I think we're gonna play better than we did last season because we improved on areas we were weak in and besides when a 13-3 team can return 19 of 22 starters that's a very good thing no matter how you slice it up

That may be true, but other teams improved more. But it's all on paper right now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like most is how knowledgeable they both are. I did not know the Eagles had new OLine AND DLine coaches. But now that I think about it, their OLine coach is their DC now, Babin came with his DLine coach. Man, they is a lot of change up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess 6 is cool for now because all people can go by is what's on paper and on paper a lot of teams look good. I think we're gonna play better than we did last season because we improved on areas we were weak in and besides when a 13-3 team can return 19 of 22 starters that's a very good thing no matter how you slice it up

"YES" I agree with you that Falcons are improved - but Falcons record will not be as good - Falcons have much tougher schedule this year - I believe 11-5 is probably closer to final record - but no question the offense and defense SHOULD be better, barring injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a preseason ranking...we'll know for sure how we rank after the first 5 games that includes 4 playoff teams from last year and one that was almost good enough to qualify in Tampa!

Scary start to the season...:o

agreed QB....we will find out quickly if Falcons are going to be elite in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be true, but other teams improved more. But it's all on paper right now though.

how can you improve more than returning 19 of 22 starters? that's 19 guys who are on the same page out the gate, no explanation needed. whereas other teams may have gotten better talent at positions but that talent has to be worked into the system, gel with their teammates and learn plays & schemes. 2 of the starters we replaced weren't that productive in the first place AND we got better talent in their place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how can you improve more than returning 19 of 22 starters? that's 19 guys who are on the same page out the gate, no explanation needed. whereas other teams may have gotten better talent at positions but that talent has to be worked into the system, gel with their teammates and learn plays & schemes. 2 of the starters we replaced weren't that productive in the first place AND we got better talent in their place.

I think we are returning 20 out of 22 starters. Dahl and Jenkins are the only two starters that are gone that I can think of. Biermann lost his starting job, but he still would count as returning this season. The fact that we have somebody new starting over him is a good thing. The fact that he's returning this year is also good because he's quality depth/rotation.

When you say a team lost 3 starters from the previous year, it's because they are no longer with the team. Am I missing anyone? Unless you are counting Keonen, but then we'd be returning 22 out of 25 starters (Bryant, Weems).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are returning 20 out of 22 starters. Dahl and Jenkins are the only two starters that are gone that I can think of. Biermann lost his starting job, but he still would count as returning this season. The fact that we have somebody new starting over him is a good thing. The fact that he's returning this year is also good because he's quality depth/rotation.

When you say a team lost 3 starters from the previous year, it's because they are no longer with the team. Am I missing anyone? Unless you are counting Keonen, but then we'd be returning 22 out of 25 starters (Bryant, Weems).

exactly & you're right. but actually Jamaal Anderson was listed as the starter most of last season, so I had to include him only because of depth chart. but if you wanna get technical, we're also returning Jason Snelling & Harry Douglas, who also 'started' at some point last season & Peria Jerry, Stephen Nicholas along with Bierman who also 'started' on defense. I just can't see how somebody could think there were teams that improved better than that. guess I'm dumber than I thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how can you improve more than returning 19 of 22 starters? that's 19 guys who are on the same page out the gate, no explanation needed. whereas other teams may have gotten better talent at positions but that talent has to be worked into the system, gel with their teammates and learn plays & schemes. 2 of the starters we replaced weren't that productive in the first place AND we got better talent in their place.

You're saying 19... only two losses I count are Jenks and Dahl... am I missing someone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LInk

Woodson thinks we are better than the Ain'ts, Tucker thinks we should be better than the Eagles.

Nice to get a lil respect.

I for one am not about to call that respect. He may as well rank us dead last and say we don't stand a chance. Makes no difference to me what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always harder to improve when you're already the best! ;)

It's much easier to improve when you get beat by a 7-9 team in the playoffs! :o

Lol, like a wise man once said, if you are not improving, you are getting worse...or something like that. If I would say anything bad about the offseason of your team, it would be that your depth did not improve.

how can you improve more than returning 19 of 22 starters? that's 19 guys who are on the same page out the gate, no explanation needed. whereas other teams may have gotten better talent at positions but that talent has to be worked into the system, gel with their teammates and learn plays & schemes. 2 of the starters we replaced weren't that productive in the first place AND we got better talent in their place.

Just because they are a starter doesn't mean that they are worth sH*t. Some of those "returning starters" could have been upgraded like the starting Free Safety and the starting slot receiver.

Like who?

The teams above you on that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like most is how knowledgeable they both are. I did not know the Eagles had new OLine AND DLine coaches. But now that I think about it, their OLine coach is their DC now, Babin came with his DLine coach. Man, they is a lot of change up there.

All those guys from the NFL Sirius channel that have daily shows are really well informed, Ross Tucker in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one am not about to call that respect. He may as well rank us dead last and say we don't stand a chance. Makes no difference to me what they say.

If they ranked us dead last I would care because most likely they had a good reason to rank us that low. If they have us in anywhere the top 16 though I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they ranked us dead last I would care because most likely they had a good reason to rank us that low. If they have us in anywhere the top 16 though I don't care.

i have a much wider range of don't care 1-32. If we're bad enough to be ranked 32, I would be well aware of our problems and would as always care more about how the team is performing, than caring at all about some meaningless ranking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...