Jump to content

Get Out Your Checkbooks


MattM12
 Share

Recommended Posts

My link

he longest work stoppage in NFL history presumably is about to end. And that will lead to the shortest window of opportunity to sign free agents in history.

There will be no time for window shopping and little time for haggling. Smart shoppers will prevail. Here's a team-by-team Shopper's Guide to get the most out of the NFL's version of the day after Thanksgiving at the local mall. We're focusing here the NFC. Click here to check out the Shopper's Guide to the AFC.

NFC NORTH

Chicago Bears

Money is no object: The offensive line needs a jolt of physical, consistent talent and it begins with Harvey Dahl, but doesn't end there. The Bears could well make a play on any of the highly touted guards and tackles. They may be better served splitting big money with receiver Santana Moss or Santonio Holmes.

Smart shopper: Value signings along the offensive line could prove invaluable in the physical NFC North. San Diego tackle Jeromey Clary is a valuable if unheralded player on a national scale.

Detroit Lions

Money is no object: The once-woeful Lions could become one of the league's dominant and marquee defenses overnight if they sign Nnamdi Asomugha. With Ndamukong Suh up front and Asomugha shutting down one side of the field, the road to the playoffs goes directly through the owner's checkbook.

Smart shopper: An addition or two at linebacker clearly is necessary. Without a lot of money to spend presuming an Asomugha signing, the best fits and price tags would be the oft-injured but consistent Justin Durant or the unproven but skilled James Anderson.

Green Bay Packers

Money is no object: It may seem that the Super Bowl champs don't need much, especially with injured players returning. But the DL is one big injury away from being a soft spot. Aubrayo Franklin should be the premiere target.

Smart shopper: The Packers are in a position where they can sign players for a specific need. Texans WR/KR Jacoby Jones fits the value here, as does, perhaps, Reggie Bush, who could be a spot receiver and kick returner.

Minnesota Vikings

Money is no object: It's becoming obvious Donovan McNabb will be in play for the Vikings, but would that work with Christian Ponder presumably on the fast-track to playing time? If the Vikes sign McNabb and go for a safety, like Eric Weddle, it will be clear they want to win and win soon.

Smart shopper: If Ponder is the quarterback of the future, the best play clearly will be signing Trent Edwards, who would know his role and help the rookie. The need signings could come at safety, where Roman Harper or Michael Huff could fit the role.

NFC SOUTH

Atlanta Falcons

Money is no object: There simply won't be a better all-around fit in free agency than Charles Johnson, a Georgia product, and the Falcons. Johnson will be a big-ticket item, but with the Falcons on the brink of greatness, they should over-spend. Next-best target: Ray Edwards.

Smart shopper: The biggest priority will be signing their own offensive linemen. But if the Texans' Rashad Butler and Pittsburgh's Trai Essex become available as unrestricted free agents, they fit the Falcons' style. Butler is a versatile tackle who could fit in at guard. Essex is a big, power lineman that can play both sides of the center, too.

Carolina Panthers

Money is no object: The Panthers likely will lose sack specialist Charles Johnson and most likely DeAngelo Williams. They'll need a splash headliner. Donovan McNabb is it. He also would take off some of the pressure to play Cam Newton too soon.

Smart shopper: If receiver Sam Hurd hits the open market, he's the type of player who could fit now and help later as well. At 26, he's young enough to be there when or if Newton develops. T.J. Houshmandzadeh might be another fit.

New Orleans Saints

Money is no object: Whether or not Lance Moore hits the open market, they need to look at receiver. Braylon Edwards would come at a premium price, but would be a perfect fit and could perform well under Sean Payton and Drew Brees.

Smart shopper: Even after the draft, the linebacking corps needs experience and depth. Zac Diles or Ben Leber could be good fits and decent value, while Rocky McIntosh is a logical fit, having played for Gregg Williams previously.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Money is no object: Any team that has Nnamdi Asomugha in their sites is going to have to pay a premium price -- the Bucs will make sure. No team will have more cap flexibility. The Bucs also could pick up an elite back like Ahmad Bradshaw ... or maybe even both.

Smart shopper: Depth and value at running back could come in the form of Reggie Bush, who has knee problems, or Florida native Fred Taylor, who is contemplating retirement. Both could fit in nicely with a younger, bigger back.

NFC WEST

Arizona Cardinals

Money is no object: Paul Posluszny and Stephen Tulloch both should be targeted, presuming the Cardinals will trade for a top-end quarterback rather than sign a mediocre one. Posluszny would be the first choice, but Tulloch is tough, still young and could anchor the defense.

Smart shopper: Floyd Womack and Chester Pitts are similar stories who could blossom again. Both are versatile, at the ends of their respective careers, but still capable. Either or both could help the Cards' OL.

St. Louis Rams

Money is no object: Only two names should be dancing in Rams fans' heads -- Brandon Mebane and Barry Cofield. If the Rams land either of those two playmaking DTs, they'll become an impact defense.

Smart shopper: There may not be a better hidden gem on the market for the Rams than Steve Slaton. After a tremendous rookie year, Slaton slumped, then was benched in favor of NFL rushing leader Arian Foster and Derrick Ward. Slaton is great in space and perfect for Sam Bradford ... and he'll come cheap.

San Francisco 49ers

Money is no object: Sidney Rice and Jim Harbaugh could be a perfect match. Rice will fetch a big payday, but fits Harbaugh's style perfectly and will have a chip on his shoulder coming off an injury.

Smart shopper: A fullback like Pro Bowler Vonta Leach makes everyone better -- on the offensive line, as well as at tailback. Leach is a hard-hitting, smart player who can plant linebackers, as well as catch the ball in the red zone.

Seattle Seahawks

Money is no object: The Charlie Whitehurst era looks set to begin, with Matt Hasselbeck one of the premier QB free agents likely to depart. Whitehurst needs someone to either push him or take the job. Matt Moore of Carolina or Trent Edwards should be the players targeted.

Smart shopper: Pete Carroll likes to go off the grid sometimes. If a Moore or Edwards is not signed, why not Vince Young, the player who beat Carroll for the 2005 NCAA national championship? Carroll has a knack with players searching for a new identity or rebirth and VY definitely fits the bill.

NFC EAST

Dallas Cowboys

Money is no object: There have been issues at safety for the past five years at least. Going hard after Eric Weddle or Michael Huff are musts. And no matter what, the Cowboys must do what it takes to sign tackle Doug Free.

Smart shopper: A well-traveled pro like Chester Pitts would bring experience and depth to an offensive line in need of both. Tampa Bay vet Davin Joseph could fit the same role.

New York Giants

Money is no object: Re-signing Ahmad Bradshaw trumps all other goals, but if that cannot be done, DeAngelo Williams, Michael Bush and Jason Snelling, in that order, should be the targets.

Smart shopper: Barrett Ruud is coming off a bad year and there are questions about his ability to sustain a high level of play. He's a fantastic tackler and leader, however, and still is just 28.

Philadelphia Eagles

Money is no object: The Eagles must go all-in for Nnamdi Asomugha in order to compete in this division and fortify the defense. And if Asomugha signs elsewhere, then Ike Taylor cannot slip through their fingers.

Smart shopper: It may be a move that ultimately blows up, but with Kevin Kolb on the way out, Vince Young will be released by the Titans and could be in the perfect spot behind Michael Vick and under the tutelage of Andy Reid.

Washington Redskins

Money is no object: Before the 'Skins settle in on a receiver or quarterback target, they should go for Falcons tackle Tyson Clabo or Ravens guard Marshall Yanda. They'll be expensive, but quarterbacks would be much more willing to come to town with that kind of talent up front.

Smart shopper: Mike Shanahan insists he's good with John Beck at QB, but OC Kyle Shanahan covets Texans backup Matt Leinart, who could be available. Also, Saints DT Remi Ayodele is one of the most unheralded but effective tackles in the league and could step in nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Butler is an interesting option, and Trai essex for me is useful on the inside.

CJ to the Falcons, front page of Si.com/football

Would make a lot of us happy

Amen Brother....Amen.

Of course some will hate it if it happens but it will be most logical as stated If we do have in article.

If we have a exodus on the line ( like losing all 3 of FA linemen) then Butler IMO would be a great choice,

even if we just lost Dahl and Clabo he would still be a great choice,

Or if we just lost Dahl..... we could resign Clabo, kick him inside where his run blocking would be better and could get speed rushers away from him, and start butler at RT.... maybe I will try it on madden and see how it works ;)

One guy I hope we look at is Miller from the raiders... adding yet another threat to offense and the heir to tony G and a guy for Ryan to grow with would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen Brother....Amen.

Of course some will hate it if it happens but it will be most logical as stated If we do have in article.

If we have a exodus on the line ( like losing all 3 of FA linemen) then Butler IMO would be a great choice,

even if we just lost Dahl and Clabo he would still be a great choice,

Or if we just lost Dahl..... we could resign Clabo, kick him inside where his run blocking would be better and could get speed rushers away from him, and start butler at RT.... maybe I will try it on madden and see how it works ;)

One guy I hope we look at is Miller from the raiders... adding yet another threat to offense and the heir to tony G and a guy for Ryan to grow with would be great.

Haha! Don't know how many times I have done such things :)

Edited by Soren
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen Brother....Amen.

Of course some will hate it if it happens but it will be most logical as stated If we do have in article.

If we have a exodus on the line ( like losing all 3 of FA linemen) then Butler IMO would be a great choice,

even if we just lost Dahl and Clabo he would still be a great choice,

Or if we just lost Dahl..... we could resign Clabo, kick him inside where his run blocking would be better and could get speed rushers away from him, and start butler at RT.... maybe I will try it on madden and see how it works ;)

One guy I hope we look at is Miller from the raiders... adding yet another threat to offense and the heir to tony G and a guy for Ryan to grow with would be great.

100% agree on Miller, would be nice to see what use Palmer would be, but lack of OTAs and Minicamp prevents these types of things.

Miller may command big $$, and might not work into the plan for this year sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Writing "money is no object" in regards to teams that are already over the salary cap seems a little bizarre to me. I don't get it.

They offer two categories for teams in free agency. One is a fit for the team if money is no object (or the ideal fit) and the other is the fit if the team keeps an eye on the pocketbook. The article doesn't explain that well but that's the gist of what the author did for every team in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs will do as they always do in FA.......nothing. They'll wait around and maybe pick up a few guys off waivers......Cheap suckers!!

I don't think they have a choice anymore. They're $59 million below the cap and have to spend at least 90% of the salary cap. They either splurge for free agents or give their current players fat bonuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They offer two categories for teams in free agency. One is a fit for the team if money is no object (or the ideal fit) and the other is the fit if the team keeps an eye on the pocketbook. The article doesn't explain that well but that's the gist of what the author did for every team in the league.

Oh Ok, I get it, thanks for the explanation. Seems kind of silly though, the salary cap situation for every team is pretty easy to decipher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Charles Johnson doesn't resign with the Panthers, he will be a Falcon. I don't care who we get, but if they can't entice him to stay during that 3 day window, then there is nothing he would stay for unless we try and lowball him.

It's so many things right with him coming here: Georgia native, UGA product, playing for the hometeam, team on the brink of the Super Bowl, big check. Plus, the Panthers have Hardy, Brown, and Norwood. Plenty of young options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they have a choice anymore. They're $59 million below the cap and have to spend at least 90% of the salary cap. They either splurge for free agents or give their current players fat bonuses.

Where did you get that info? New CBA bylaws? They certainly haven't done that in the past..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, need some help with our cap as i don't know where we stand..

At this moment, the Falcons have 102 million committed. The cap is 120 million, but there is a 3 million exception, so the cap is effectively 123 million.

The Falcons can free up money by relasing any combination of Davis, Anderson, and Jenkins at approximately 3.5 mil per.

Clabo, Blalock, Dahl, Peterson, Nicholas, Snelling, Norwood, Bryant, Koenen, Trey Lewis, and Brian Williams are no longer under contract and will have to be resigned or replaced by draft picks or free agents.

All the draft picks have to be signed too.

I think that pretty much sums it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get that info? New CBA bylaws? They certainly haven't done that in the past..........

Yes they have. There has always been a floor. 2010 was the only year there wasn't a floor, and several teams, like the Bucs and Chiefs, took huge advantage of it by shedding salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they have. There has always been a floor. 2010 was the only year there wasn't a floor, and several teams, like the Bucs and Chiefs, took huge advantage of it by shedding salary.

It also seems to be an important part of the new CBA, I've heard from several different sources that the cheap teams are going to have to spend in 2011 like they never have before just to meet the new CBA rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It also seems to be an important part of the new CBA, I've heard from several different sources that the cheap teams are going to have to spend in 2011 like they never have before just to meet the new CBA rules.

Well, not since 2009 anyway. The floor in 2009 was 112.1 million, higher than this year's floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they have. There has always been a floor. 2010 was the only year there wasn't a floor, and several teams, like the Bucs and Chiefs, took huge advantage of it by shedding salary.

You're crazy dude.........the Bucs are so far under the cap it's pathetic, and have been for years...even during the Gruden years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're crazy dude.........the Bucs are so far under the cap it's pathetic, and have been for years...even during the Gruden years.

I'm just stating facts dude. The league might have changed some of the accounting rules with regards to "dead money", but the floor has always been there, and it was higher in 2009 than it is this year.

And if the Buccaneers won a Super Bowl with several HOF players on thier roster and still managed to be cheap, more power to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just stating facts dude. The league might have changed some of the accounting rules with regards to "dead money", but the floor has always been there, and it was higher in 2009 than it is this year.

And if the Buccaneers won a Super Bowl with several HOF players on thier roster and still managed to be cheap, more power to them.

The Glazer boys are proof the league doesn't enforce the minimum.......Everyone in this area will back me up on this. They need money for ManU.......and that's why they don't spend any on this team.....You can watch during FA and you'll see what I'm talking about.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Glazer boys are proof the league doesn't enforce the minimum.......Everyone in this area will back me up on this. They need money for ManU.......and that's why they don't spend any on this team.....You can watch during FA and you'll see what I'm talking about.....

I think you are going to be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...