Jump to content

For those that want to bring in Haynesworth


Recommended Posts

Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over HaynesworthNFL.com Wire Reports

Published: June 7, 2011 at 10:59 p.m. Updated: June 8, 2011 at 09:14 a.m. Liked: 2 | Comments: 98 Email Like

Print Read Discuss Friend(s) Email Your Email Send Email By NFL.com Wire Reports More Columns > Washington Redskins defensive coordinator Jim Haslett didn't hold back when explaining his issues with Albert Haynesworth in an interview with 101 ESPN radio in St. Louis.

Haslett qualified his statements by saying he likes Haynesworth, and he believes the defensive lineman can still thrive if returned to a 4-3 scheme. But he also described Haynesworth as a lazy player who either has trouble listening to -- or plain ignores -- his coaches.

"He can do almost anything he wants. He doesn't want to do anything. To me that's the issue," Haslett said. "He's one of those guys you walk in a meeting and you tell him, 'Put down the phone.' The next day you have to tell him to put down the phone. The next day, you tell him to put down the phone.

"You tell him, 'Don't read the newspaper in meetings.' The next day you have to tell him the same thing. It doesn't stick; it's an every-day thing."

Haynesworth set an NFL record in 2009 with $41 million guaranteed as part of a seven-year, $100 million contract with the Redskins. But Haynesworth fell out of favor with new coach Mike Shanahan in 2010 and repeatedly clashed over workout routines and playing time. The Redskins suspended Haynesworth for the final four games of the season for "conduct detrimental to the team."

Haynesworth exasperated Redskins coaches by essentially refusing to be part of the team's 3-4 defense last season.

"He just didn't want to play in this scheme. He didn't want to play in the 3-4," Haslett said in the interview. "He didn't want to do the things we wanted. Then we said, 'OK, if you're not going to do it, let's not do it. Let's play nickel, play the 3-technique.'

"Then, it got to the point where he said, 'I don't want to play first- and second-down nickel. I just want to play third-down nickel.' Oh my God, you're relegating yourself to 10-15 snaps a game. Then after that he didn't want to do the blitzes, he just wanted to rush."

Haynesworth's image as a poor team player is just the start of his problems. At one point last year, the 29-year-old was juggling as many four court-related matters, including lawsuits from a bank, an exotic dancer, a man injured in an automobile accident and complaints from his ex-wife that he wasn't paying her health insurance or their children's bills.

Last week, a Virginia judge dismissed a misdemeanor assault charge against Haynesworth after the player reached an agreement with the man who said he was the victim of a road-rage attack.

And last month, Haynesworth pleaded not guilty to a misdemeanor charge of sexual abuse for an incident in which he allegedly groped a waitress at a Washington hotel bar in February. That case goes to trial in July.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Edited by The Falcon Jedi Knight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the biggest problem with guaranteed contracts with outrageous signing bonuses. Do you or I know for sure what we will make the next few years whether we work hard or not? Some just can't handle this.

Were I to start a league today I would pay all the players and coaches an impressive but responsible annual base salary based on their value and tenure on the club and the rest would be in performance incentives.

Then you'd see who really wants to play some football and those making the big bucks have to earn it every day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived in Nashville, then moved to DC the year before he came here. PLEASE don't make me have to listen to anymore about this tool. He's a giant spoiled child. The Redskins have meetings at my place of work, I already saw his fat-arse enough. I feel like the guy is following me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the biggest problem with guaranteed contracts with outrageous signing bonuses. Do you or I know for sure what we will make the next few years whether we work hard or not? Some just can't handle this.

Were I to start a league today I would pay all the players and coaches an impressive but responsible annual base salary based on their value and tenure on the club and the rest would be in performance incentives.

Then you'd see who really wants to play some football and those making the big bucks have to earn it every day!

The owners should lockout Al Davis and Dan Snyder if they really want to save some money. The players are only making what the owners are paying them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that shed alot of light on things but to me the Redskins shot themselves in the foot its obvious to me by front loading his contract this is the way it could have gone.I don't no what happend to the Titans version of Albert but it seems to have been lost in that 40+ mill the Skins gifted Albert and unlike an uncureable disease Albert still has ie being lazy I really don't see where he goes from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a myth that Haynesworth's on-field play has diminished. Since 2008, he's statistically the #2 best pass rusher and the #1 best run stuffer in the NFL. Even last year, on a per snap basis, the only players that bettered him in pass rushing was; second place, Shaun Rogers and first place, rookie sensation (no, not Suh) Geno Atkins. He was the best at stuffing the run last year.

There is nothing wrong with his on-field play and ability. The off-field stuff though is a huge gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a myth that Haynesworth's on-field play has diminished. Since 2008, he's statistically the #2 best pass rusher and the #1 best run stuffer in the NFL. Even last year, on a per snap basis, the only players that bettered him in pass rushing was; second place, Shaun Rogers and first place, rookie sensation (no, not Suh) Geno Atkins. He was the best at stuffing the run last year.

There is nothing wrong with his on-field play and ability. The off-field stuff though is a huge gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a myth that Haynesworth's on-field play has diminished. Since 2008, he's statistically the #2 best pass rusher and the #1 best run stuffer in the NFL. Even last year, on a per snap basis, the only players that bettered him in pass rushing was; second place, Shaun Rogers and first place, rookie sensation (no, not Suh) Geno Atkins. He was the best at stuffing the run last year.

There is nothing wrong with his on-field play and ability. The off-field stuff though is a huge gamble.

I think we have enough character and leaders on the defensive side of the ball to keep him in line. Staying out of trouble off the field in ATl would be the problem..even Dunn got profiled but AH wouldn't handle it right IMHO. One weed won't kill the garden. I would risk it for the right price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the funny thing is that he is going to get whats coming to him!!! he is a punk that thinks cause he has all this money he can do what he wants!!! he kicks people when they are down (Andre Gurode) and if i was his team i would be talking about him making him hate it even more that he on the team!!! AND FALCONS DONT AND WILL NOT GET HIM!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a myth that Haynesworth's on-field play has diminished. Since 2008, he's statistically the #2 best pass rusher and the #1 best run stuffer in the NFL. Even last year, on a per snap basis, the only players that bettered him in pass rushing was; second place, Shaun Rogers and first place, rookie sensation (no, not Suh) Geno Atkins. He was the best at stuffing the run last year.

There is nothing wrong with his on-field play and ability. The off-field stuff though is a huge gamble.

If he is refusing to do what the coaches tell him to do, then there is something wrong with his on-field play. You can be good at 1 thing if that is the only thing you agree to do. Ability? Yes, that is not what is in question.

“Then, it got to the point where he said, ‘I don’t want to play first- and second-down nickel. I just want to play third-down nickel.’ Oh my God, you’re relegating yourself to 10-15 snaps a game. Then after that he didn’t want to do the blitzes, he just wanted to rush.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.

That's what happens when you have a playmaker in Mike Vick.

Regardless, in the first tape, Haynesworth made a crucial stop in a pressure goal-line situation in the last 2 minutes of the game. In the second tape, Haynesworth runs out of energy in a blowout, in the 4th quarter I believe. I'll take a guy that can jump over centers on the goal line even if he doesn't play his best in the 4th quarter of a blow out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...