KRUNKuno Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 I've said this before, but I'll kind of restate it. I have been thinking we will go after Nnamdi for a couple of reasons:1. Although it seems as if we need a defensive end, considering if the NFL decides to go by the 2010 rules there will be no defensive end worth signing. Any defensive end will have to be had through a trade.2. The biggest way to offset poor defensive line play is through stellar defensive back play. We would have 3 of the league's top cover guys. It would be a beautiful problem to have.3. Brent Grimes....I love Brent Grimes, as do most of us, but Grimes' is looking for a contract after an extremely solid season. There's no way he will settle for less than what we gave Dunta after he statistically outperformed Dunta.4. Signing Nnamdi would mean we would have 3 playmaking, tough cornerbacks for at least one year. If we sign Nnamdi, however, we will have A+ insurance if Grimes leaves the following year.5. Would you rather give a huge contract to the prototypical corner still in his prime, or the underdog corner who is limited by his size at times but is definitely on the up-rise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.