Jump to content

An e-mail I got this morning


Recommended Posts

With one of the most exciting regular seasons now completed and the playoffs about to begin, let me first thank you and all NFL fans for your incredible support. Many fans have been asking me where we stand on signing a new collective bargaining agreement with the players union. Let me update you and be clear at the outset:

I know we can and will reach an agreement.

My goal as Commissioner now is to help our teams and players find a solution that is fair to everyone and ensures that football becomes more popular, accessible, and fun. We want the next decade to be the best yet for our fans, and I’m ready to work day and night to make that happen.

We've come a long way. Compare where we are today with 10 years ago. From player accountability to player safety, more and better television coverage, upgrading the in-stadium experience, innovations like the RedZone channel, the Draft in prime time and playing the Pro Bowl before the Super Bowl, we are focused on doing what’s best for the players, teams, and fans. My priority is and always will be the game and the fans who love our game.

The NFL is great because fans care deeply about it. Economic conditions, however, have changed dramatically inside and outside the NFL since 2006 when we negotiated the last CBA. A 10 percent unemployment rate hurts us all. Fans have limited budgets and rightly want the most for their money. I get it.

Yes, NFL players deserve to be paid well. Unfortunately, economic realities are forcing everyone to make tough choices and the NFL is no different.

These are not easy negotiations, but the outcome can be positive. If both sides give a little, everyone, including fans, will get a lot and the game will improve through innovation.

Even in difficult economic times, a new CBA presents us with the opportunity to secure the future of our game. You may ask how will the NFL look under this vision?

A significant change would be to resolve fan complaints about preseason by modifying our 20-game format. Fans tell us they don’t like the quality of the preseason games, and we’re listening. An enhanced season of 18 regular season and two preseason games would not add a single game for the players collectively, but would give fans more meaningful, high-quality football.

Our emphasis on player health and safety is absolutely essential to the future of our game. We are strictly enforcing rules that protect players from unnecessarily dangerous play, especially involving hits to the head. We are changing the “play through it” culture to a “player-first” culture to ensure that if a player has a head injury, he doesn’t play again until his health is certain. We are also addressing the potential wear-and-tear on players in the way they train in-season and off-season.

It’s not just the health of players that concerns us. We must ensure the health of the league. That includes a new system that properly compensates proven veterans and retired players by shifting some of the outrageous sums paid to many unproven rookies. Earlier this year, Sports Illustrated published a list of the 50 highest-paid American athletes that included five 2009 NFL rookies. Every other athlete on the list was a proven veteran. In 2009, NFL clubs contracted $1.2 billion to 256 drafted rookies with $585 million guaranteed before they had stepped on an NFL field.

Don’t get me wrong: top draft choices will continue to be highly paid. All we’re asking for is a return to common sense in paying our rookies. Other leagues have done this and we can too.

These improvements and more will lead to better football, plain and simple. A forward looking CBA that is fair to players and clubs will lead to a great future for the NFL and our fans.

My job is to represent the game — the fans, teams, players, coaches and business partners. Protecting the integrity of the game and ensuring it thrives is a responsibility I take very seriously.

This is about more than a labor agreement. It’s about the future of the NFL. We have to improve and will be relentless in our quest. The commitment to our fans is to make the NFL experience even better in the years ahead. With a responsible CBA, we will fulfill that vision.

Happy New Year and enjoy the playoffs.

– Roger Goodell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats sick....what did you email him?

That was an e-mail that he apparently sent to people who had expressed opinions on the possible lockout. I had written to him and the NFLPA letting them know that while I love football, I refuse to be held hostage as a fan and there are other things I can spend my money on next year if they don't get this worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of me likes the idea of a longer season (becasue the off-season is too long), but on balance I don't like the idea of moving to 18 games.

Increasing roster sizes won't off-set this or make much of a difference. Most fringe players see very limited action even now, often playing only when others get hurt. If the NFL adds 2 more games, the additional players won't share the burden. Teams will just try to play their starters for the 2 extra games and hope they don't get hurt. I'd keep it at 16 games and add an additional bye-week.

I am biased, but I support the NFL's decison to play games overseas. Playing 1 or 2 of the league's 256 regular season games overseas is hardly a massive sacrifice for fans stateside. I do sympathsie with STH's of the teams who lose a home game, but fans should keep it in perspective. Playing 1 International game a season, with teams sharing the burden of particiapating, means each team playing an overseas game every 16 years, and losing a home game every 32 years. Fans stateside are spoiled, and wouldn't believe the lenghts that many international fans go to in order to follow the NFL, paying significant amounts to do so and staying up through the night every week to watch and listen to games etc. IMO people shouldn't begrudge those fans an opportunity to watch a live NFL game in person.

If the NFL want to increase its revenues, rather than focusing on 18 games they should be looking to open up and maximise their revenues from overseas. The NFL loses out on huge amounts of potential revenue, because the cost of getting items shipped from the US is astronomical (flat rate $150 postage to ship even the smallest and lightest items from Falcons365 to Europe + importnation taxes on items over about $40). A merchandise distributiion cente set up in Europe to service the needs to International fans, would make millions for the NFL.

I agree with the rookie cap. The money gives to the top 10-15 rookies needs to be reduced, and a fairer deal given to the guys taken in rounds 2-7 and UFA, who receive only $400k-$500k for the first 3 years of their careers, no matter how well they perform. That's fine if a player spends his time on the bench, but there should be more incentives in their deals, to better reward the ones who are successful. The owners and NFLPA should also do a lot more for the veterans who made the NFL what it is today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was an e-mail that he apparently sent to people who had expressed opinions on the possible lockout. I had written to him and the NFLPA letting them know that while I love football, I refuse to be held hostage as a fan and there are other things I can spend my money on next year if they don't get this worked out.

I got the same email. We'll see what happens....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...