Jump to content

I noticed a possible new Falcon fashion trend at the game today


Nono
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if you obtained permission for the use of copyrighted, trademarked, and propriatary material used in your website for marketing purposes. One must be very careful of that these days.

Everthing on my page is mine or I have got permission to use photos that were sent to me by the potographer. The only thing that is not mine is the Falcon emblem and the one picture of Matt Ryan on the front. what specifically are you talking about? Thanks!!

Edited by mattyicehead.com
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Meth and Ice are the same thing =0

I think the idea is cool, but I think we should try and change the shape a bit so it isnt SO much like the cheese heads. We need to stay original.

Dirty Bird dance anyone?

This is the protrtype. The real ones will be ready Friday and they look a little different, ie thicker more like an ice cube.

Edited by mattyicehead.com
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everthing on my page is mine or I have got permission to use photos that were sent to me by the potographer. The only thing that is not mine is the Falcon emblem and the one picture of Matt Ryan on the front. what specifically are you talking about? Thanks!!

You have to have the NFL's express written consent to use anything that belongs to them. If you don't and they notice they will sue you and shut down your business. It's easier just to remove anything the NFL would view as their property. When you're making money off of the NFL they're going to want their share.

Evidence:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4871697

Updated: January 30, 2010, 8:20 PM ET

NFL claims trademark infringement

Associated Press

NEW ORLEANS -- Who owns "Who Dat?"

Some T-shirt makers are asking that question after they were hit with cease-and-desist letters from the NFL demanding that they stop selling shirts with the traditional cheer of New Orleans Saints fans.

The National Football League says the shirts infringe on a legal trademark it owns. Separately, two brothers and longtime Saints fans claim they own the phrase, which was around before the long-downtrodden team's inception in 1966.

The league said Friday it's not trying to exclude all uses of Who Dat and the fleur-de-lis logo -- just when either is used in combination with other Saints trademarks, like their fleur-de-lis logo and uniform designs.

It seems unclear who, if anyone, owns it. A lot of people believe it belongs to the city and the people.

” -- New Orleans shop owner Gabriel Harvey

The chant -- "Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints" -- is often shortened to "Who Dat" on shirts and signs and has been a mainstay at the Superdome since the 1980s. Saints fans, still jubilant after the Saints' win over the Minnesota Vikings for their first Super Bowl appearance, have voiced their dismay on radio talk shows, blogs and Web site posts.

Many say it's something that simply can't be owned.

"How can they put a trademark on something that's been around for 150 years?" said Robert Lauricella, a 50-year-old oil field sales representative. "Just because the Saints have made the Super Bowl, why does everybody have to make a buck?"

Shirts bearing the Saints cheer are big business as the team prepares for the big game against the Indianapolis Colts in Super Bowl XLIV on Feb. 7 in Miami.

Lauren Thom, owner of the Fleurty Girl T-shirt shop in New Orleans, said Thursday that she recently received a letter from the NFL demanding that she quit selling "Who Dat" shirts.

"I don't mind paying royalties," Thom said. "I just don't know who owns 'Who Dat' or whether it's in the public domain."

[+] EnlargeT-shirt

AP Photo/Judi BottoniThe beloved 'Who Dat' cheer and the NFL's claim to the legal trademark has put Saints fans in a defiant state of mind.

The NFL doesn't cut much slack when it believes it owns a trademark. This case is no exception.

In an e-mail, league spokesman Brian McCarthy said the NFL has sent a handful of letters in the past year asking vendors to stop selling "Who Dat" merchandise. The unlicensed shirts led fans to believe the Saints endorsed the product, he said.

"This helps protect the local businesses that are selling legitimate Saints merchandise and also the local printers that are making the licensed Saints apparel," he said.

Meanwhile, WhoDat Inc., controlled by longtime Saints fans and brothers Sal and Steve Monistere, also claims rights to the phrase.

In 1983, Steve Monistere produced the song "Who Dat Say They Gonna Beat Dem Saints" with Aaron Neville and several Saints players.

In a statement Thursday, WhoDat Inc. said that before that recording, there were no branded items with the motto. The brothers said the company has the only federal trademark for "Who Dat." Steve Monistere said he and his brother were at the Saints' first game in 1967 and have been fans through all the ups and downs -- mostly downs, of course.

Storyville shop co-owner Gabriel Harvey pulled his "Who Dat" shirts after getting letters from the NFL and WhoDat Inc.

"It seems unclear who, if anyone, owns it," Harvey said. "A lot of people believe it belongs to the city and the people."

Two members of Louisiana's congressional delegation -- Republican Sen. David Vitter and Democratic congressman Charlie Melancon -- took public umbrage at the NFL.

Please either drop your present ridiculous position or sue me.

” -- Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, in letter to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell

Vitter wrote NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, urging the league to concede that "Who Dat" is in the public domain. Otherwise, Vitter said he will print and sell T-shirts with "WHO DAT say we can't print Who Dat!" on them.

"Please either drop your present ridiculous position or sue me," Vitter wrote.

Later Friday, NFL vice president Jeffery Miller told Vitter in a letter that the league is narrowly targeting Who Dat products "only when those products contain or are advertised using other trademarks or identifiers of the Saints."

"This is consistent with steps the NFL has taken in the markets of the NFL's other 31 member clubs when infringements are identified," Miller said.

Melancon provided a link -- headed "No One Owns WHO DAT" -- on his Twitter page to a petition encouraging the NFL to back off.

The "Who Dat" chant's origins are somewhat murky. Some historians say it came about in the days of late 19th-century minstrel shows and later showed up in vaudeville routines. In 1937's "A Day at the Races," the Marx Brothers perform a number -- in blackface -- called "Who Dat Man."

"Who Dat" also is used in a 1938 MGM cartoon -- now seldom seen because of its racially offensive nature -- called "Swing Wedding," which featured frog caricatures of black entertainers such as Ethel Waters, the Mills Brothers, Louis Armstrong and Cab Calloway.

It's been yelled at high school and college games, and fans of the Cincinnati Bengals are known to chant "Who Dey?"

Glenn Lunney, a Tulane University Law School professor specializing in intellectual property, said a trademark is different from a copyright or patent and doesn't necessarily have to be original. For example, computer and iPod manufacturer Apple trademarked the familiar, centuries-old fruit, he said.

"You can take a word and by applying it to goods or services get people to think about your goods or services," and get commercial rights, he said.

The NFL would likely argue it has a valid trademark because "Who Dat" is so strongly associated with the Saints, he said.

In a similar case, bookstores around the University of Wisconsin sold "Bucky Badger" T-shirts royalty-free for years -- until the university trademarked the mascot itself in the late 1980s and won its case in court, Lunney said.

As for Thom, she said several New Orleans attorneys have offered free legal help.

And how about the WhoDat Inc. guys? They "were nice" about the situation, Thom said -- "they said we should market the shirts together and make more money together."

Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to have the NFL's express written consent to use anything that belongs to them. If you don't and they notice they will sue you and shut down your business. It's easier just to remove anything the NFL would view as their property. When you're making money off of the NFL they're going to want their share.

Evidence:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4871697

I don't think they have any dibs on Icehead or the nickname "Matty Ice" or the concept of "Icehead".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to have the NFL's express written consent to use anything that belongs to them. If you don't and they notice they will sue you and shut down your business. It's easier just to remove anything the NFL would view as their property. When you're making money off of the NFL they're going to want their share.

Evidence:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4871697

Thanks for the info!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they have any dibs on Icehead or the nickname "Matty Ice" or the concept of "Icehead".

You can think that, but you'd be wrong. The NFL is essentially Debo, they take what they want from those trying to infringe on their empire. You just have to be smart about how you approach making money off of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to have the NFL's express written consent to use anything that belongs to them. If you don't and they notice they will sue you and shut down your business. It's easier just to remove anything the NFL would view as their property. When you're making money off of the NFL they're going to want their share.

Evidence:

Wow, the NFL is a real piece of work, isn't it?

But I guess it's just like every other monopoly.

That's why I side with the players on most issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to have the NFL's express written consent to use anything that belongs to them. If you don't and they notice they will sue you and shut down your business. It's easier just to remove anything the NFL would view as their property. When you're making money off of the NFL they're going to want their share.

Evidence:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4871697

Yep. I remember watching an episode of "True Life: I'm a sports fanatic" on MTV. There was this chick who called herself "Giants Girl". She's a huge N.Y. Giants fan and smokin' hot. So to make some extra cash, she started a Web site where she would post pictures of herself modeling in Giants apparel. Seems innocent enough considering she bought the jerseys and all herself and it had now become her property. But oh no. When the league got hold of the information they sent her a cease and desist letter, threatening to sue her big time if she didn't take down the pictures using their trademark or compensate the NFL for using them. It all seems very petty, considering the NFL is a multi-billion dollar business. But they have every right legally to do this.

So I hope this doesn't happen in this case. I like the idea and love the entrepreneurship. But you do have to be careful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. I remember watching an episode of "True Life: I'm a sports fanatic" on MTV. There was this chick who called herself "Giants Girl". She's a huge N.Y. Giants fan and smokin' hot. So to make some extra cash, she started a Web site where she would post pictures of herself modeling in Giants apparel. Seems innocent enough considering she bought the jerseys and all herself and it had now become her property. But oh no. When the league got hold of the information they sent her a cease and desist letter, threatening to sue her big time if she didn't take down the pictures using their trademark or compensate the NFL for using them. It all seems very petty, considering the NFL is a multi-billion dollar business. But they have every right legally to do this.

So I hope this doesn't happen in this case. I like the idea and love the entrepreneurship. But you do have to be careful.

Thanks for the info!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...