MSalmon Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 With the colts losing Bob Sanders and having all types of safety issues, would you trade for Coleman for one of their WRs? Garcon or Blair White? Or anthony Gonzalez? My reasoning is that we still have Shann Schillenger as a back up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0D3RNW4RRIOR Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 That's not happening.Not for Garcon or Anthony Gonzalez. Erik Coleman is worth a second string Colts receiver and maybe a mid-late round draft pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1989Fan Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 That's not happening.Not for Garcon or Anthony Gonzalez. Erik Coleman is worth a second string Colts receiver and maybe a mid-late round draft pick.Coleman is worth a late round pick, and thats it. I couldnt see us getting more than a 6th for him. He just lost his starting job, why would teams want him if they arent desperate. Melvin Bullitt is prolly better than Eric Coleman.If IND trade any WR it would be Gonzo, since h cant stay healthy, and why would we want that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Not going to happen, Garcon at this point is worth a lot more to the Colts than a replacement DB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Not to mention having veteran leadership is something the Falcons value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted October 5, 2010 Author Share Posted October 5, 2010 Coleman is worth a late round pick, and thats it. I couldnt see us getting more than a 6th for him. He just lost his starting job, why would teams want him if they arent desperate. Melvin Bullitt is prolly better than Eric Coleman.If IND trade any WR it would be Gonzo, since h cant stay healthy, and why would we want that?I thought about that, but Coleman is a steady guy who's relatively injury free and knows the cover 2 scheme. BTW i have no basis for this being a reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muskokas finest © Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 With Coleman and Gonzalez missing the last game and Collie nicked up, the Colts aren't in any position to trade WRs away. With the Pats secondary struggling, Wes Welker healthy, Tate and Woodhead contributing, you might get Edelman out of New England. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 DeCoud is in his 3rd year and did not play much in his 1st year.Moore is in his 2nd year and missed nearly all of his first year due to injurySchillinger is a rookie and has not played very much.All that equals little experience (regardless of the amount of talent there)That would be the entire safety corps if you traded Coleman.Yes I know Williams can fill in (if needed) but that would be desperate and emergency.I do not think the Falcons would consider trading Coleman at the present time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaymadd Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Not a good idea to trade our most experienced DB in our scheme. I do understand why you would suggest this, but we need Coleman, he is great insurance for us because he can play both the FS and SS positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0D3RNW4RRIOR Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I think fans need to stick with making draft proposals for Madden, and let the GM and people affiliated with the Falcon's organization deal with real life player proposals. They know what goes on behind closed doors, and they know which players are valued higher and know more about their assets and liabilities along with other team's assets and liabilities that we see on tv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kschreck Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 With the health issues the Colts WRs have I don't think they'd be trading. Besides that, it's not that they always hit when they draft WRs, it's the QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Reg Da Commish Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Not a good idea to trade our most experienced DB in our scheme. I do understand why you would suggest this, but we need Coleman, he is great insurance for us because he can play both the FS and SS positions.Exactly! Even if Moore keeps the starting job, Coleman is too valuable to trade. If either DeCoud or Moore gets hurt (and Moore's been hurt a lot) Coleman could step in for either. Otherwise, you have rookie Schillinger backing up both positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamee101 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Not a bad trade idea IMO, but I like the depth for our secondary and I think we'll be alright at receiver once Jenkins comes back. (Still can't believe I'm saying that... :wacko: ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyoshot Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I don't think Coleman is worth that much, and I also don't like the idea of having Schillenger is the primary backup either at this point.Even if the Colts were open to the idea, I doubt TD would. It doesn't seem like he has had any interest in adding any other WR this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfalcons Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I'd rather have a more experienced, not to mention better, player for depth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peyton Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Just got off the phone with Peyton Manning and he said that is a NO GO.I do think that Dimitroff should smooze up to Polian at the next draft. That guy knows how to find freaking WR talent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juiceaccts Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 No way. Did we forget about Moore's injury history, plus he's as solid of a backup as they come. Beast on ST. Vet leadership. We have Jenks coming back, Douglas warming up, and even Meier for next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconinPA Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Just got off the phone with Peyton Manning and he said that is a NO GO.I do think that Dimitroff should smooze up to Polian at the next draft. That guy knows how to find freaking WR talent. LMAO!!! +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abe Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I would have to say no. The reason is right in front of us in the form of Spoon's injury. We have a very solid number 4 linebacker that stepped in when we needed him. That is the same safety net we have with Coleman. I don't want Shan having to fill in just yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Birds are the truth Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 With Coleman and Gonzalez missing the last game and Collie nicked up, the Colts aren't in any position to trade WRs away. With the Pats secondary struggling, Wes Welker healthy, Tate and Woodhead contributing, you might get Edelman out of New England.Edelman would be nice addition to the Falcons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finally Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Let's see how many replies we can make in a thread that basically repeat the same thing over and over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconsd56 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 The only way we could do that is if we signed Micheal Lewis who was just cut by the niners, as someone mentioned we are thin in terms of experience at safety....we have alot of young talent but not much experience.Even if we did not trade Coleman I would not mind picking up Lewis for even more depth even though that would not happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachx Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) Not a good idea to trade our most experienced DB in our scheme. I do understand why you would suggest this, but we need Coleman, he is great insurance for us because he can play both the FS and SS positions.Agreed !Coleman is a solid insurance policy at both S spots.I also agree that our WR depth is lacking but hopefully Jenkins fixes that and returns this week. Douglas is really worrying me with his drops though. He simply drops every ball when there is contact. Edited October 5, 2010 by coachx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0D3RNW4RRIOR Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Let's see how many replies we can make in a thread that basically repeat the same thing over and over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo Risin Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) No! **** no! I'm not selling out our secondary so we can get an if at WR that would take a while to get in tune with the offense. Edited October 5, 2010 by Mojo Risin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.