nolafan33 Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 This is just a portion of the writeup, Falcon fans make sure to read the entire report. It's a very good writeup. --Devery Henderson. The Saints like to take a handful of "shot" plays downfield in the passing game each week. They usually go to one of the two primary deep threats: Henderson or Robert Meachem. With Meachem slowly rounding into form after offseason surgery, Henderson was the main target and the Saints tried three shots at him downfield and came up empty each time. Henderson dropped two of the passes. The final one would have been a big gain because he had beaten Dunta Robinson deep. These were the kind of plays the Saints hit routinely a year ago. --Malcolm Jenkins. The second-year defensive back came back down to earth this week. After two good performances at his new position, Jenkins was exploited by the crafty Falcons attack on a handful of plays for big gains. The converted cornerback took bad angles and was late to arrive on the scene on a couple of key third-down conversions. Chalk it up as a learning experience for the talented young defender.--Jon Vilma. He led the Saints with 11 tackles but this was far from his best effort. Too many times he found himself caught up in the "wash" against the run, allowing Michael Turner and Jason Snelling big gains up the gut. Vilma is undersized and struggles to shed blocks at times. This was one of those days. Falcons linemen got their hats on Vilma way too often at the second level.--Carl Nicks. Nicks is a budding star but he didn't play his best game. Powerful defensive tackle Jonathan Babineaux won this matchup more often than not and was a big reason why the Saints struggled to run the ball, especially in short-yardage situations.--Heath Evans. The Saints' failed to convert a fourth-and-1 and a third-and-1 and in both cases Evans didn't get a hat on his target. It's unfair to hang the short-yardage woes strictly on Evans, but he was partly responsible. To his credit, Evans was a stand-up guy afterward, taking full accountability for his sub-par play.All in all, this was just a sloppy all-around performance by the Saints. It spoiled outstanding efforts by Lance Moore (six catches, 149 yards, two touchdowns; 72-yard punt return) and Jeremy Shockey (eight catches, 78 yards, one touchdown).Look for the Saints to get back on track this week against Carolina. But they're a banged-up football team after this five-quarter battle with the physical Falcons.http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2010/09/falcons-saints_film_study.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nolafan33 Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 Wow, nobody? This is good stuff.Guess I'll have to wait for WFW's morning spam rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtybirdn@tion Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Nola the Falcons missed some golden opportunities as well....But at least this article admitted they were physically beat down....this much is true.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 This is just a portion of the writeup, Falcon fans make sure to read the entire report. It's a very good writeup.http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2010/09/falcons-saints_film_study.htmlcant disagree with this assessment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shredman Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 i am gonna watch the game again here in few minsbut all that sounds kinda right i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintdogg Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 (edited) Nola the Falcons missed some golden opportunities as well....But at least this article admitted they were physically beat down....this much is true....Of all the Falcons opportunities, I wouldn't call any of them "golden". They were routine plays that hit and miss on a regular basis in every game. Falcons took adavantage of 99% of every opportunity they were given. There was one opportunity for the Saints, we're talking 24 karat, virgin, straight outta earth gold. When the **** are they going to fix this stupid *** message board??? Edited September 29, 2010 by Saintdogg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Of all the Falcons opportunities, I wouldn't call any of them "golden". They were routine plays that hit and miss on a regular basis in every game. Falcons took adavantage of 99% of every opportunity they were given. There was one opportunity for the Saints, we're talking 24 karat, virgin, straight outta earth gold. When the **** are they going to fix this stupid *** message board???when are your stupid *** going to leave this message board?? all you post is ******** dribble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintK Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 when are your stupid *** going to leave this message board?? all you post is ******** dribbleGo up to Taft. No one is making u post in RIVAL Central moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintdogg Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 (edited) when are your stupid *** going to leave this message board?? all you post is ******** dribbleIt's not "when are", it's "when is". I'm a single person, not a group. Also, the word is DRIVEL. I can "dribble" a basketball quite well and I'm pretty sure I'd make an even bigger fool of you doing it than you are doing to yourself....and stop soiling Weatherspoon's name. You should change it to Peter Griffen or Cris Carter. Edited September 29, 2010 by Saintdogg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Of all the Falcons opportunities, I wouldn't call any of them "golden". I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU CALL GOLDEN,BUT THAT LAST ONE WE GOT CAME STRAIGHT FROM FORT KNOX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 But at least this article admitted they were physically beat down....this much is true....PHYSICALLY BEAT DOWN AIN'T THE HALF OF IT.ATLANTA MAN HANDLED THE SAINTS ON BOTH SIDESOF THE BALL. BRUTE FORCE VS. FINESSE, GUESSWHOSE GOING TO WIN? THAT WAS THE TYPE OFTRENCH WARFARE THAT MOST TEAMS WILL NOT BEABLE TO HANDLE. (or, want to handle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird587 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 It's not "when are", it's "when is". I'm a single person, not a group. Also, the word is DRIVEL. I can "dribble" a basketball quite well and I'm pretty sure I'd make an even bigger fool of you doing it than you are doing to yourself....and stop soiling Weatherspoon's name. You should change it to Peter Griffen or Cris Carter.im pretty sure he meant the group of saints fans...not just you :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobkowski Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 It's not "when are", it's "when is". I'm a single person, not a group. Also, the word is DRIVEL. I can "dribble" a basketball quite well and I'm pretty sure I'd make an even bigger fool of you doing it than you are doing to yourself....and stop soiling Weatherspoon's name. You should change it to Peter Griffen or Cris Carter.reminds me of a song: "Tell It Like It Is"But at least he is on the right mb pulling for the best team.Oh, and thanks for the link to a good informative article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderCookie Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 The only thing I really take exception to is the implication that Lofton high-lowed ala Saints on Farve. He was pushed (or tackled) into the runner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GritsPittz Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 What I got out of that article is that the Falcons were the better team. Saints just couldn't match the physicality, and it's a good thing Sharper will be coming back this year for the saints because Malcolm Jenkins isn't nearly as good as Saints fans were hoping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rightsaidfred Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Look for the Saints to get back on track this week against Carolina. But they're a banged-up football team after this five-quarter battle with the physical Falcons.If they can't get "back on track" vs. CAR, they got troubles a plenty. One could also point to the ever so slightly overthrown pass to Harry Douglas that the Falcons routinely complete.That would have ended the game right then and there and Hartley would still be the PK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintK Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 True. hat was one of the first things i pointed out after the game last weel. You know though, they were pretty upset about that missed kick so they overlooked that pass... beings that the game should of been over in the 3rd after 2 BAD drops by Devery! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamee101 Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Interesting. Always good to read the perspective from someone who was looking to see what the opposition did right/wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintdogg Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 (edited) If they can't get "back on track" vs. CAR, they got troubles a plenty. One could also point to the ever so slightly overthrown pass to Harry Douglas that the Falcons routinely complete.That would have ended the game right then and there and Hartley would still be the PK. Since when do the Falcons "routinely complete" 50+ yard bombs? They don't call Matt Ryan "noodle arm" up in TATF for nuthin'. That missed play, in no way shape or form, compares to a kick that is made with 90% consistency in teh NFL. The missed kick was FACTUALLY a fluke. The missed bomb to Douglas was "routine". Edited September 30, 2010 by Saintdogg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rightsaidfred Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 :lol: Since when do the Falcons "routinely complete" 50+ yard bombs? They don't call Matt Ryan "noodle arm" up in TATF for nuthin'. That missed play, in no way shape or form, compares to a kick that is made with 90% consistency in teh NFL. The missed kick was FACTUALLY a fluke. The missed bomb to Douglas was "routine".Not a problem, sunshine. And, BTW - you can come out now........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintdogg Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Not a problem, sunshine. And, BTW - you can come out now...........I'm the sun in that picture fool. When was the last time Ryan completed a pass over 50 yards btw Mr. Ostrich? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintdogg Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 I thought excuses and wah wah whining would be over by thursday. Are saints fans taking it that hard? You haven't seen any wah wah just yet. Just wait until the 49ers STUN the Falcons Sunday. :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintK Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 I thought excuses and wah wah whining would be over by thursday. Are saints fans taking it that hard? Hey asswhipe did u read any other post other than mine. I responded to a whiny falcon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamee101 Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Since when do the Falcons "routinely complete" 50+ yard bombs? They don't call Matt Ryan "noodle arm" up in TATF for nuthin'. That missed play, in no way shape or form, compares to a kick that is made with 90% consistency in teh NFL. The missed kick was FACTUALLY a fluke. The missed bomb to Douglas was "routine".Not really...you guys have a shaky kicker and he shanked a kick. Expected him to make it but not really a fluke...just came up short in crunch time. That's like saying us giving up the long punt return that set up the 1st TD was a fluke...or the busted coverage that lead to the Moore TD was a fluke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintK Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Not really...you guys have a shaky kicker and he shanked a kick. Expected him to make it but not really a fluke...just came up short in crunch time. That's like saying us giving up the long punt return that set up the 1st TD was a fluke...or the busted coverage that lead to the Moore TD was a fluke.No not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts