GreenFire Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 This "Run First" approach we have been taking the last three years was great in 2008, albeit with bad run defenses. But with Ryan now maturing, I think we must not only go from a balanced offense but to a pass first offense. We still need to run effectively, which we failed to do against Pittsburgh, but I would like to see a full game where rather than trying to bulldoze over defenses, we try to catch them off guard with runs. The run playcalls were so predictable against Pittsburgh. Let's mix it up on first down. We didn't run play action often enough, especially with the way we ran on 1st and 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Zee Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I have no issue with us staying balance as long as we are efficient running the ball. It helps control the clock and wears down the D. However, if we are only averaging 2.2 YPC, then yea we need to let Ryan do his thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLfanintheROC Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Well seeing as how we ain't making da playoffs this yr I can c y, I mean how many predictable runs can u do w/ this terrible oline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenFire Posted September 16, 2010 Author Share Posted September 16, 2010 The O-Line did get beat last week, but it also held tough a lot of plays. Turner wasn't making ANYTHING happen. There was at least three instances where I got excited because I saw a huge hole open up and Turner failed to make the first man miss through the hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Right Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 This "Run First" approach we have been taking the last three years was great in 2008, albeit with bad run defenses. But with Ryan now maturing, I think we must not only go from a balanced offense but to a pass first offense. We still need to run effectively, which we failed to do against Pittsburgh, but I would like to see a full game where rather than trying to bulldoze over defenses, we try to catch them off guard with runs. The run playcalls were so predictable against Pittsburgh. Let's mix it up on first down. We didn't run play action often enough, especially with the way we ran on 1st and 10.Running with one feature back is becoming outdated in the NFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenFire Posted September 16, 2010 Author Share Posted September 16, 2010 Running with one feature back is becoming outdated in the NFL.Absolutely. Norwood needs to have 150 carries and its not happening. Get him involved. Whatever it takes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pr0d1gy Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I've said this for awhile now, but the only teams who win running first are monster defenses. Ravens, Bucs, etc. would be the perfect example and Brandon Jacobs was piggy backing the Giants for a good part of their Super Bowl season. The teams that win now are passing teams that run for balance and easy yards when the defense loosens up. It's been that way in the NFL for long time now, honestly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feelnu Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I think we should find our identity. Smith wants to pound the ball, but we really don't have athletic guards that can pull and get it done. I rarely see our gaurds pull. It doesn't help we're predictible. Line up 2 TE and an extra OL is definitely a sign of running he ball. What's worse is even though you have all these guys on feild, they aren't opening holes for the RB. Once we can control the line of scrimmage, then we can determine whether to run or pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlsport Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 This "Run First" approach we have been taking the last three years was great in 2008, albeit with bad run defenses. But with Ryan now maturing, I think we must not only go from a balanced offense but to a pass first offense. We still need to run effectively, which we failed to do against Pittsburgh, but I would like to see a full game where rather than trying to bulldoze over defenses, we try to catch them off guard with runs. The run playcalls were so predictable against Pittsburgh. Let's mix it up on first down. We didn't run play action often enough, especially with the way we ran on 1st and 10.Its hard to fault 'run first' when the game ended with only 23 handoffs and 44 passing attempts. A number of those runs happened later in the game but even then when it appeared that they were mixing in some runs with the passing, the running game was held in check. The offense has on its own had some problems getting in rhythm, and a good defense is only going to make things more difficult to get anything going, especially play action which depends on a good run game to be effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great American Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Run first still works ... it's just we are having problems with it. I can't pinpoint the problem but I suspect that ot stems from one of three causes: 1)Our o-line is over-rated, 2) Our RB's are inadequate, or 3) a combo of #1 and #2. Of course I wouldn't rule out poor play-calling and predictability either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyhateme : ) Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 One thing that the Atlanta Falcons has always insisted upon was to "run the ball" but when the run doesn't work, we don't have a backup plan. :blink: :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.