PureRealFootballHead Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 All game the coordinator was doing well with personnel and different packages. (Run downs and pass downs with #98 & #71)On the OT touchdown run on 1st down...already on the 50...only needed 15 - 20 yards for winning field goal. They weren't going to risk making a mistake with a 3rd QB already on our side of the field. (In my opinion they were thinking get as close to field goal range as possible with the run!) JA would've been in there for me. He's alright against the run, not moved or stood up as easily. Against Drew and the AINTS. teams like that..the Beer-man starts for me. 1st game...we got the pieces to play chess!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capologist Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 All game the coordinator was doing well with personnel and different packages. (Run downs and pass downs with #98 & #71)On the OT touchdown run on 1st down...already on the 50...only needed 15 - 20 yards for winning field goal. They weren't going to risk making a mistake with a 3rd QB already on our side of the field. (In my opinion they were thinking get as close to field goal range as possible with the run!) JA would've been in there for me. He's alright against the run, not moved or stood up as easily. Against Drew and the AINTS. teams like that..the Beer-man starts for me. 1st game...we got the pieces to play chess!!Actually, Biermann was held by Heath Miller big time on that play but oh well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illest_will Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 and Grimes shot the wrong hole...a lot was wrong with that play, just a defensive breakdown honestly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pay the Zebra Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Steelers o-line is patchwork garbage so I wasn't surprised that the Falcons got good penetration all game. They've got Flozell Adams starting for christsake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
me4falcons Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 and Grimes shot the wrong hole...a lot was wrong with that play, just a defensive breakdown honestly.NO HE DID NOT, Mike p was blocked back into him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illest_will Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 look at the play again...Mendenhall had the chance to take the outside, Grimes overplayed the outside, then ran into Peterson when he tried to come back to the inside hole. that's why he did that lil' spin move to get around Peterson, from Peterson's side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimus*Crimes Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 NO HE DID NOT, Mike p was blocked back into him.Grimes did miss his gap. It was "a missed assignment" per Mike Smith...Mike Smith... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
me4falcons Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 (edited) Grimes have the outside as the CB, mike p is clearly being driven back into him. Edited September 14, 2010 by me4falcons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illest_will Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 but he had an open lane to the RB...he simply shot the wrong gap. you've never seen a CB make a tackle in the middle of the field on a RB before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BazookaJoe Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Grimes did miss his gap. It was "a missed assignment" per Mike Smith...Mike Smith...Grimes went into motion covering Hines Ward he didn't have an assignment on that side.He isn't the one who missed his assignment.Supposed to be a safety on the other side of that hole the Pitt OL made Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdonawire Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Grimes went into motion covering Hines Ward he didn't have an assignment on that side.He isn't the one who missed his assignment.Supposed to be a safety on the other side of that hole the Pitt OL madeIf "Beerman " was not blow out of the hole no of this would have occured. He was pancaked several times on run plays and kifed inside on a screnn in the 1st quarter that he should have recognized. He is not rady for fulltime duty, especially on run downs, he is best for situational pass rushing until he can get a lot stronger and more experience. Starting him was a mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BazookaJoe Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 If "Beerman " was not blow out of the hole no of this would have occured. He was pancaked several times on run plays and kifed inside on a screnn in the 1st quarter that he should have recognized. He is not rady for fulltime duty, especially on run downs, he is best for situational pass rushing until he can get a lot stronger and more experience. Starting him was a mistake.DeCoud should have hung back for run coverage that play.He didn'tMendenhall blew right by him, and no one was left in the backfield to catch him coming through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureRealFootballHead Posted September 14, 2010 Author Share Posted September 14, 2010 @capologist...maybe. There's holding on every play..you still need to be stout! The other posters are right.. somebody missed that gap by Beer-man getting illegally held and moved. My opinion at that point in the game.. that 1 down...Ja would've held up better against a TE or OL....on a running down. (thought that was an O-linmen the way he got stood str8 up then held and moved). Players has to be put in the right position at the right time to succeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureRealFootballHead Posted September 14, 2010 Author Share Posted September 14, 2010 If "Beerman " was not blow out of the hole no of this would have occured. He was pancaked several times on run plays and kifed inside on a screnn in the 1st quarter that he should have recognized. He is not rady for fulltime duty, especially on run downs, he is best for situational pass rushing until he can get a lot stronger and more experience. Starting him was a mistake.lol.(I was being nice and political)..agree kinda on mistake of starting him..It stayed close...we did make it to OT with the Beer-man starting. If Big Ben was playing situation would have been different....Steelers thought process would have been different in my opinion. Maaannn! We have the pieces...they have to be put in the right place at the right time. Chess!.... Both sides! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 He wasn't the only one blown up on that play. No one got penetration on that play. Our D locked tired on that play. Trey Lewis got pancaked also. The whole left side of the defensive got blown up on that play. Only time that happen the entire game. The one 10 yard run earlier in the game was a missed assignment by Weatherspoon. Also noticed the alignment was different, Weatherspoon had been playing over the tightend, but we were in our base 4-3. I think we tried to blitz Decoud to the outside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BazookaJoe Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 It was a straight up cover 3. DeCoud wasn't supposed to blitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Decoud came up and set the edge then, thought he was trying to blitz. We got no penetration on that play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HASHBROWN3 Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 We're still bitching and moaning man. One freakin play after stuffing their a$$es all game long. I'm movin on guys. We should have won that game on 5 or 6 drives down the field during the game. Instead, it was field goal practice time. I would prefer moaning about the 4th and 1 at the 5 weenie call. Worst thing woulda happened is we pin thier *** deep and forced a turnover or another punt... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5 to the squad Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 mularkey should've never put the defense in that situation in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsupersport Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 mularkey should've never put the defense in that situation in the first place.Honestly he didn't. Smith would have made the call about 4th down and 1, and in OT MM made good enough play calls to get a first down, BUT Baker held his man and cost the down. Also it was a horrible, crappy, putrid, disgusting PUNT, that set up the whole 50 yard line anyway. So in OT you had a hold on kickoff costing 10 yards, Hold on 3rd down costing a first down and ten yards, and then a bad punt. That was the sequence that lost us that game, the icing on the cake was the horrible defense play after having a very good game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdonawire Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 mularkey should've never put the defense in that situation in the first place.Some of you guys keep complaining about Mularkey's play calling but for the most part you are wrong. If you would notice Ryan changes the play about 7 out of 10 times. The play calling mistakes should be directed at Ryan for changing the plays moreso than the OC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LADBABY Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Peterson should not have been in the gamein the fourth quarter let alone OT. Nicholaswould not have let that guy run through therewhile he danced with a blocker. Peterson neededsomebody to hold him upright at that point. Somebody, anybody! He was the misfit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red falcon Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Peterson should not have been in the gamein the fourth quarter let alone OT. Nicholaswould not have let that guy run through therewhile he danced with a blocker. Peterson neededsomebody to hold him upright at that point. Somebody, anybody! He was the misfit.Yeah, I hope nick starts soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LADBABY Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Yeah, I hope nick starts soonPeterson is good when he is fresh. Is he going to befresh in OT at his age. It is very unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5 to the squad Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Some of you guys keep complaining about Mularkey's play calling but for the most part you are wrong. If you would notice Ryan changes the play about 7 out of 10 times. The play calling mistakes should be directed at Ryan for changing the plays moreso than the OC.his offense. ryan gets a set of 3 or 5 plays i can't remember to choose from.also it's mularkey's personell groupings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.