sticktracy Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 (edited) All i say is if Roethlisberger wouldve played disgame wouldve been alot different. Dennis Dixon aint dat good. We got a break in this game guys. LETS GO FALCONS! Edited October 16, 2010 by sticktracy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyBirdNorth Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 All i can say is if Roethlisberger wouldve played this game wouldve been alot different. Dennis Dixon isnt that good. We got a break in this game guys. LETS GO FALCONS!I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanRooney Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated.lol you can't be serious. You've obviously never watched Roethlisberger play before. I agree this game would have been bad for you guys if Ben was in and I'm not trying to be mean. Dixon was beyond pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanRooney Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanRooney Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanRooney Posted September 12, 2010 Share Posted September 12, 2010 I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated.I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsWrath Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 I believe Roethlisbergers days are numbered in Pittsburgh. Dixon is a pretty good player and the Steelers defense is very good and will keep them in games all season long. They should never be underestimated.WHAT?! this loss has you delirious man.. really put the pipe down sloowly and walk away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atljbo Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Thats the thing... I think if Ben would have played... We would have played more aggressive (play calling wise) ... It seem like since we was playing Dixon.. It seem like we played more towards field position since we didnt fear that dixon would put up big numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Thats the thing... I think if Ben would have played... We would have played more aggressive (play calling wise) ... It seem like since we was playing Dixon.. It seem like we played more towards field position since we didnt fear that dixon would put up big numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Thats the thing... I think if Ben would have played... We would have played more aggressive (play calling wise) ... It seem like since we was playing Dixon.. It seem like we played more towards field position since we didnt fear that dixon would put up big numbersthat makes no sense at all, when you play an inexperienced player you throw the kitchen sink at them and try to force them into mistakes...i think we didnt do that, because dunta couldnt keep hines ward in check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raysnill1 Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 lol you can't be serious. You've obviously never watched Roethlisberger play before. I agree this game would have been bad for you guys if Ben was in and I'm not trying to be mean. Dixon was beyond pathetic. there were a few plays that DD made with his feet, that Big Ben most likely woulda been sacked on. plus DD didn't make that many bad throws considering it was his first start. dude put up 18/26, 236 YDS, 1 INT, it ain't like he stunk it up like Kevin Kolb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atljbo Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 that makes no sense at all, when you play an inexperienced player you throw the kitchen sink at them and try to force them into mistakes...i think we didnt do that, because dunta couldnt keep hines ward in checkI'm not talking about Defensively... I'm talking offensively... Defensively.. We played allot of zone .. I think we played zone because we didnt want Dixon to run on us... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 there were a few plays that DD made with his feet, that Big Ben most likely woulda been sacked on. plus DD didn't make that many bad throws considering it was his first start. dude put up 18/26, 236 YDS, 1 INT, it ain't like he stunk it up like Kevin Kolbwow alot of ppl here must not watch the steelers very often, big ben is twice as hard to sack then denis dixon, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean weatherspoon Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 I'm not talking about Defensively... I'm talking offensively... Defensively.. We played allot of zone .. I think we played zone because we didnt want Dixon to run on us...if roethlisburger played the steelers score in the 20'ss our offensive game plan wouldnt have mattered Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raysnill1 Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 wow alot of ppl here must not watch the steelers very often, big ben is twice as hard to sack then denis dixon,Ben is one of the most sacked QBs in the game right now. dude averages bout 45 sacks a season. dude I remember them doing a segment on how many times he gets sacked on ESPN NFL Sunday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.