wuskillzz Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) There has been speculation for some time that this would happen, but its a definate according to Yahoo. According to the article, they plan on leaving the Heisman winner vacant for 2005. I think this is unfair. They should either vote again or give it to second place finisher (Vince Young). The other canidates shouldnt be penalized because Bush didnt follow the rules.Thoughts? Edited September 8, 2010 by wuskillzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threepac Daddy Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 it should go to vince young, he came in second place. its like a race, if the 1st place guy gets DQ then the 2 place guy is the winner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo77 Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 It shouldnt go to vince young. he wasnt the best that year. you cant give it to second place. Lets be honest Bush's cheating was not on the field. however if bush was caught using steroids or HGH or something that would effect field play then i would agree with you to give it to young. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.