wuskillzz Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) There has been speculation for some time that this would happen, but its a definate according to Yahoo. According to the article, they plan on leaving the Heisman winner vacant for 2005. I think this is unfair. They should either vote again or give it to second place finisher (Vince Young). The other canidates shouldnt be penalized because Bush didnt follow the rules.Thoughts? Edited September 8, 2010 by wuskillzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.