BadMoonRising Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Can anyone tell me what I missed?I wasn't high on keeping ethier back, but if I did Nance would of been it.was it special teams or something that he offered? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Falcon Jedi Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 No clue. Except I heard he was good at emulating Ronnie Brown in practice. I dont know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMeatTroughsEgo Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 (edited) 1. Experience2. Knowledge of the plays3. Special teams4. Blocking5. He sucks so it must be some of the 4 above. Edited September 5, 2010 by DaMeatTrough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kibitzer Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Someone posted the stats earlier. That's one point, nearly double what Nance did. But it wasn't that, that impressed me. He seemed shiftier to me, and better between the tackles and in the open field. I didn't see him on STs, and I missed the fumble in the Jax game that everyone was pissin' and moanin' about. He just looked like a more solid FB player to me. Brick hands on a few passes? You betcha, I saw that too. Nothing against Nance, I wouldn't have complained about him making the team, and he did seem to be a better receiver. Just Smith outplayed him - again - from what I saw. This has got to be another "body of work" thing from Smith and TD, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadMoonRising Posted September 5, 2010 Author Share Posted September 5, 2010 Someone posted the stats earlier. That's one point, nearly double what Nance did. But it wasn't that, that impressed me. He seemed shiftier to me, and better between the tackles and in the open field. I didn't see him on STs, and I missed the fumble in the Jax game that everyone was pissin' and moanin' about. He just looked like a more solid FB player to me. Brick hands on a few passes? You betcha, I saw that too. Nothing against Nance, I wouldn't have complained about him making the team, and he did seem to be a better receiver. Just Smith outplayed him - again - from what I saw. This has got to be another "body of work" thing from Smith and TD, IMO.Hopefully your right, I will never claim to be a GM but Nance seemed to have a bigger impact in the games I saw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abe Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 All I could see was he was much more explosive than the other back. He had that fumble but his speed was easy to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulitik Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Dude is a bucket of suck. Not sure what the FO is thinking. I would have rather kept Klecko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Falcon Jedi Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Dude is a bucket of suck. Not sure what the FO is thinking. I would have rather kept Klecko.+1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e.lo Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Dude will be the first one to go when we add someone who was cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real_fan Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Can anyone tell me what I missed?I wasn't high on keeping ethier back, but if I did Nance would of been it.was it special teams or something that he offered?Insurance for fragile Norwood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LADBABY Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 (edited) He has speed and urgency on special teams.He is a good runner. Warrick Dunn type small shifty and fast.His college highlights are very impressive and show what he can do.Maybe he caught the ball alright in practice because he wasdropping everything thrown to him in games. So obviouslythat didn't earn him a spot. Edited September 5, 2010 by LADBABY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock Howard Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 I project that 2 or 3 of the players currently in the 53 or destined for the practice squad and if the FO can get them there without exposing them to the waiver wires, why not? That would match up with Jay's mention of Smith's ability to emulate various fast backs we might face in the future.Another possible point is that perhaps the ST coaches have found that with his speed and physicality he might make a good gunner for kick coverage. (Anyone notice how Smith was used on ST during the preseason?)But I am hoping that what is really going on is that the coaches are planning to seriously upgrade Norwood's role in the overall game plan and they are loathe to do that unless we have another player on the roster or at least on the practice squad who can also learn that role and be ready to step into it if/when Norwood gets nicked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FA91 Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Smith had 32 carries for 124 yards for a 3.9 avg. He lead the team in running yardage during the preseason and tied Turner for yards per carry.Nance has good hands and caught passes well but I think his running was a little lack luster as he had 21 carries for 51 yards for a 2.4 avg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kibitzer Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Dude is a bucket of suck. Not sure what the FO is thinking. I would have rather kept Klecko.Well, you may have a valid argument about keeping Klecko, but not for a role-based reason. I remember a lot of talk about Snelling like this when he first joined the team, and I'm NOT making comparisons here.... I'm just saying sometimes we (fans/viewers) don't always see the upside on players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Bill Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Speed and good hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millenium falcon Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 i was always impressed with ledell betts. when NO cut him i figured he was not healthy after knee surgery, but he looked ok vs TEN.antone needs to be upgraded though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDash Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Insurance for fragile NorwoodBingo, Mr.Glass and I believe he is backup Kickoff returner to weems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris30277 Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Can anyone tell me what I missed?I wasn't high on keeping ethier back, but if I did Nance would of been it.was it special teams or something that he offered?I think it had to do with build/style of play. We have 2 guys that can pound the ball (Turner and Snelling) and we only had 1 guy that had breakaway speed (Norwood) Smith is supposed to have that type of speed. Now I was all for keeping Nance because I didn't like Smith, but I think the coaching staff is still worried about Norwood making it through the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 (edited) I think it simply came down to "running styles".Your power backs are:Michael TurnerJason SnellingYour speedy/change of pace back is:Jerious NorwoodOf the rookies, their styles are:Antone Smith-speedy/shiftyDmitri Nance-power backSmith is more versatile with Punt and Kick Returns plus insurance should(when) Norwood goes down. I liked Nance a lot but I understand why they chose Smith over Nance. Edited September 5, 2010 by g-dawg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris30277 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 I think it simply came down to "running styles".Your power backs are:Michael TurnerJason SnellingYour speedy/change of pace back is:Jerious NorwoodOf the rookies, their styles are:Antone Smith-speedy/shiftyDmitri Nance-power backSmith is more versatile with Punt and Kick Returns plus insurance should(when) Norwood goes down. I liked Nance a lot but I understand why they chose Smith over Nance.+1 for saying everything I said but better :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rightsaidfred Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Speed. Pure and simple. Dude is just plain fast.Stay tuned. The roster will continue to be tweaked over the next 4 weeks. Smith may not be a Falcon by the end of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harveybirdman Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 something about inheriting certain pictures from a certain former Reeves tight-end... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.