JDaveG Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 ....this is just shameful.....Melanie Crozier on Wednesday, July 21st, 2010 in a Politico articleGroup says GOP candidate Karen Handel would be OK aborting child with Down syndromePants on Fire!Now that the Republican gubernatorial runoff is on, some Georgia abortion foes are taking aim at front-runner Karen Handel.Handel placed first in the GOP primary despite Georgia Right to Life's criticisms that she's not pro-life enough. A late endorsement by conservative darling Sarah Palin helped her rocket ahead of opponents.And that's what concerns Melanie Crozier, the director of the Georgia Right to Life's Political Action Committee, Crozier said in a recent article for Politico, an online news site. "[Palin] has a son with Down syndrome, and under Karen Handel’s laws, Handel would have felt like it was OK to go in and abort that child," said Crozier.Crozier added that they plan to back Nathan Deal, Handel's opponent in the GOP runoff.We did a double take. Handel is fine with aborting a fetus that tests positive for Down syndrome?No, she's not, Handel said. Her campaign called Crozier's statement a "cruel and revolting lie." She called on Crozier and GRTL President Dan Becker to step down. We requested to speak with Crozier. Instead, GRTL sent us a press release on their opposition to Handel's views on in vitro fertilization.But Crozier did talk with WSB-TV. In the interview, she apologized for making a statement that was unclear and said she was really criticizing Handel's views on in vitro fertilization. GRTL thinks doctors should create only as many embryos as they plan to implant. Handel thinks that if any are left over, they should be considered for adoption. Crozier has not asked for a correction or clarification on the Politico story, according to its author. GRTL and Handel have tangled before. She, like other GOP candidates, has declared herself "pro-life," but some claim she's not "pro-life" enough.In statewide runs, Handel has consistently opposed abortion except in the cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is at stake.GRTL supports only one exception: the life of the mother.Handel has taken hits from GRTL for her views for years, but she has stood her ground.When Handel ran for secretary of state in 2006, GRTL sent out a postcard naming her primary runoff opponent as the race's only true right-to-life candidate. Handel won without the organization's support.GRTL and Handel were at loggerheads again in June, after Becker used the word "barren" to talk about Handel's struggles with fertility and her position on abortion. She has previously talked publicly about how she tried unsuccessfully to have a child for 10 years.And when Palin announced her endorsement of Handel on July 12, GRTL issued a press release to say they were "stunned" because Handel's views on abortion showed she did not cherish the lives of children with genetic disorders as much as she should. Palin's son Trig was born in 2008 with Down syndrome, a genetic disorder that causes physical problems and cognitive delays.In a July 22 interview with Lori Geary on WSB-TV, Crozier tried to clarify the statement she made to Politico.Crozier: "What I’m saying is, if a baby who is created through the process of in vitro fertilization ..."Geary: "Which again, Palin’s was not ..."Crozier: "But we’re saying, if this was the case, and was found to have Down syndrome, Karen Handel is OK with that life being exterminated."Handel's campaign denies this claim as well."They're making a series of reaches beyond anything Karen believes," said her campaign spokesman Dan McLagan.What Crozier told Politico doesn't stand up to to scrutiny. Neither does her clarification.GRTL failed to provide any evidence whatsoever for the statement that Handel thinks it is fine to abort a child because it has Down syndrome. And the organization failed to explain how it came to its conclusion.The group should have known that they were misrepresenting Handel's beliefs. They've been quibbling with her stances for years.After Handel called for the resignation of GRTL's leadership, the group backed so far off its statement that Crozier claimed she wasn't really talking about aborting children with Down syndrome. Instead, she told WSB-TV, she was really talking about in vitro fertilization. But, as Geary pointed out, Trig wasn't conceived in a test tube. How could the subject apply to him?Crozier made a baseless and outrageous statement.She earns PolitiFact's lowest rating, Pants on Fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOzOne Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 That's absolutely insane. It doesn't matter what the truth is because stupid people remember the smear, not the correction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I hate it because NEITHER side of the political spectrum really cares about abortion, they just want to talk about it and use it for votes. certainly the ones against it are not actually doing anything to outlaw it . It's a shame something that is in reality quite important is used on the same level as gay marriage. Political points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDaveG Posted July 26, 2010 Author Share Posted July 26, 2010 I hate it because NEITHER side of the political spectrum really cares about abortion, they just want to talk about it and use it for votes. certainly the ones against it are not actually doing anything to outlaw it .More to the point, they are willing to lie about their own to get their preferred candidate in office. I'd wager GRTL thinks Deal can win and Handel can't, and that's the basis for the smear. I seriously doubt they think Handel is truly "weak" on abortion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of God Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Good points all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 More to the point, they are willing to lie about their own to get their preferred candidate in office. I'd wager GRTL thinks Deal can win and Handel can't, and that's the basis for the smear. I seriously doubt they think Handel is truly "weak" on abortion.MAybe they think the Palin endorsement is the kiss of death. :P But politics is a dirt business for sure. That was a huge smear to throw at your own party and one easily disproven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconsd56 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 (edited) More to the point, they are willing to lie about their own to get their preferred candidate in office. I'd wager GRTL thinks Deal can win and Handel can't, and that's the basis for the smear. I seriously doubt they think Handel is truly "weak" on abortion.See this is why the Democrats don't fear the Tea Party the way people think they should.The Tea Party and that ilk have fractured the GOP. Edited July 26, 2010 by falconsd56 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefenseWinzCliche Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 But the question that matters to me as a voter is: "Would she have aborted Sara Palin if given the opportunity?". That's important.... to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconsd56 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 But the question that matters to me as a voter is: "Would she have aborted Sara Palin if given the opportunity?". That's important.... to me.nah she is entertaining and her porn parody's are awesome........err so I have been told :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.