Jump to content

Tea Party/GOP crazies lining up to out-stupid each other. "Gather your armies" agains the IRS.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I love how a lot of these guys tend to equate their campaigns with the ideals of the founders of the nation. But the biggest difference between this guy and the founders is that if he fails, he will simply go back to what he was doing before. The founders knew that if they failed, they would swing at the end of a rope and their families would be ruined and destitute.

It's easy to talk of revolution and "gathering armies" when you're not putting anything on the line. No more associating political campaigns with the American Revolution, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt, but I don't see as many Democratic candidates acting like this.

The GOP has fragmented into smaller factions. This has allowed the "crazies" you speak of to find a voice. The left did the same thing in the late 1990's, but on a much smaller scale and certainly didn't get the airtime these guys are getting (Thanks, internet). But they are still there, lurking in the shadows and calling into radio shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how a lot of these guys tend to equate their campaigns with the ideals of the founders of the nation. But the biggest difference between this guy and the founders is that if he fails, he will simply go back to what he was doing before. The founders knew that if they failed, they would swing at the end of a rope and their families would be ruined and destitute.

It's easy to talk of revolution and "gathering armies" when you're not putting anything on the line. No more associating political campaigns with the American Revolution, please.

This dammit this this THIS!

If I never agree with you on anything ever again, that right there is as brilliant a thing as anyone has said on this subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how a lot of these guys tend to equate their campaigns with the ideals of the founders of the nation. But the biggest difference between this guy and the founders is that if he fails, he will simply go back to what he was doing before. The founders knew that if they failed, they would swing at the end of a rope and their families would be ruined and destitute.

It's easy to talk of revolution and "gathering armies" when you're not putting anything on the line. No more associating political campaigns with the American Revolution, please.

Not much different from the recruiters that convince weak minded and otherwise decent young people to blow themselves up in the name of Allah. For some reason, these guys think it's cool to incite others to action and when some tool acts on it, they say that the guy was crazy and took him out of context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GOP has fragmented into smaller factions. This has allowed the "crazies" you speak of to find a voice. The left did the same thing in the late 1990's, but on a much smaller scale and certainly didn't get the airtime these guys are getting (Thanks, internet). But they are still there, lurking in the shadows and calling into radio shows.

There is a difference between calling a radio show and running for political office.

If he really thinks it was just about tea tax he us really really stupid. Anyone who votes for him would fall into that same arena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This dammit this this THIS!

If I never agree with you on anything ever again, that right there is as brilliant a thing as anyone has said on this subject.

I respect Gritz and PP as well. Always think before you respond. My view of this politician is "Talk is cheap"! When your butt is on the line, then we'll know what you're made of!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between calling a radio show and running for political office.

If he really thinks it was just about tea tax he us really really stupid. Anyone who votes for him would fall into that same arena.

Sigh...

You're correct. The democratic party has less crazies than the right. Is that the point you were trying to make?

Congrats, you win the giant turd that is American Politics!

Woot Woot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh...

You're correct. The democratic party has less crazies than the right. Is that the point you were trying to make?

Congrats, you win the giant turd that is American Politics!

Woot Woot.

I never said that.

I was just stating the obvious fact that the two are not equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both parties have crazies but even at the highest point of anti-Bush fever the left wasn't bringing assult weapons to events because they need protection from him. I can deal with crazy left talk but the crazy right with ammo is worse. Obama wasn't in office for 6 months when these folks bought any gun they could get their hands on. I am still waiting to see how he is going to take over the Republic with the military or his unveiling as the anti-Christ. I just can't see him doing the "take over" without the military or the marking of 666 so I assume thats the reason the crazy right needs all the weapons. Both parties have turds but the crazy right turds are arming themselves and believing the rapure will soon be upon us.

dude the rapture is already upon us. just visit the Random Hotties thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both parties have crazies but even at the highest point of anti-Bush fever the left wasn't bringing assult weapons to events because they need protection from him. I can deal with crazy left talk but the crazy right with ammo is worse. Obama wasn't in office for 6 months when these folks bought any gun they could get their hands on. I am still waiting to see how he is going to take over the Republic with the military or his unveiling as the anti-Christ. I just can't see him doing the "take over" without the military or the marking of 666 so I assume thats the reason the crazy right needs all the weapons. Both parties have turds but the crazy right turds are arming themselves and believing the rapure will soon be upon us.

This is what I'm talking about... Assault weapons? How many were there? Two, three? You act like the crowd was chock full of them. Hyperbole at its finest. It's perfectly ok to draw Hitler stashes over a President, but to say he's the anti-Christ, well that's just over the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I'm talking about... Assault weapons? How many were there? Two, three? You act like the crowd was chock full of them. Hyperbole at its finest. It's perfectly ok to draw Hitler stashes over a President, but to say he's the anti-Christ, well that's just over the line.

How many Democratic candidates were calling for armed uprising and borderline seditious propaganda during the Bush administration? There were leftwing loonies during Bush, but they weren't part of the mainstream Democratic Party. The GOP has fully embraced the Tea Party idiocy. That's the major difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the secessionsists (whom were also charged with "sedition" by the British and their lapdog "tories")signed the Declaration of Independance, they made sure the King got a copy. It had their NAMES on it. Many had their homes and livestock, their goods and crops burned and utterly destroyed. Many lost their lives.

This man volunteers his name and beliefs for public dissection and criticism and rightly so if he intends on representing others, he should be as transparant as possible on his philosophy of natural law and natural rights as well as his understanding of the role of Government.

You write anonymously with a pseudonym on a public forum.

Edited by Boston T. Party
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many Democratic candidates were calling for armed uprising and borderline seditious propaganda during the Bush administration? There were leftwing loonies during Bush, but they weren't part of the mainstream Democratic Party. The GOP has fully embraced the Tea Party idiocy. That's the major difference.

They weren't asking for secession. They were just asking for:

impeachment

election fraud

war crimes

Then again, the republicans didn't try to fundamentally alter the basis of our economy like the democrats. They just started a war. [shrugs]

If you look to the left and don't see any crazies...you probably are one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not saying that is over the line. They could call him the love child of Satan and Hitler for all I care. The question in this enviroment do you then allow someone who believe's in their heart like that to be armed near the President?

Ok easy question how many right wing idiots with an assault weapon do it take to shoot a person? Next easy question show me ONE time in the past 100 years where this was ever done or allowed.

Imagine the Secret Service telling President Kennedy that Lee Harvey Oswald or President Reagan that John Hinckley fellow is just practicing his rights to bear arms. When you are referring to the President of the United States to answer the question one crazy is too many period.

ALLOW?

The 2nd amendment protects a soverign citizen's right to bear arms. The President being in close proximity does not supercede that soverign right anymore than the 1st amendment. Should a citizen be muzzled in the presence of the President? NO! Because his right to FREE speech is guranteed.

So is his RIGHT to bear any firearm (if you attack someone with a marble bust of Beethovan isn't still "assault"?)he pleases.

Crazy people exist. Unstable people are drawn to public events and read meaning into circumstances and coincidence, many of them have driver's liscenses and own cars that are capable of thousands of times more kenetic energy than a firearm. Yet we "allow" them to drive and that's not even a RIGHT guranteed by the Bill of Rights.

Your objection is obvious so let's just get it out in the open:

You believe these rights are the Government's to give and take away.

That's what the Tory's thought as well when they sided with their British Masters who primised them land and title. They would rather be cared for than free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...