Jump to content

Atlanta listed as the 6th losingest pro team by Forbes.


Recommended Posts

Blah Blah Blah.

That's all old news. Yes we used to suck and Mike Vick played here. Before the 2000 season the Pats were pretty lousy for awhile. The Colts were terrible before Manning. And the Saints? Come on they sucked for just as long.

Our time is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah Blah Blah.

That's all old news. Yes we used to suck and Mike Vick played here. Before the 2000 season the Pats were pretty lousy for awhile. The Colts were terrible before Manning. And the Saints? Come on they sucked for just as long.

Our time is now.

Why do you think the falcons time is now? They haven't even won a playoff game with the current team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UMMMMMMM..... how come the Saints arent on here? Their winning percentage, according to wikipedia (yes i know wikipedia has a history of inaccuracy, but i would believe it in this case) is .425, which would fit in nicely among the ranks of inadequacy

because they can pay off Forbes just like they did the refs all year; with bottles of vicoden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because they can pay off Forbes just like they did the refs all year; with bottles of vicoden

right right of course, how could i forget. How could anyone possibly fathom that the Saints, the current darlings of the NFL, could ever possibly be complete Sh it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UMMMMMMM..... how come the Saints arent on here? Their winning percentage, according to wikipedia (yes i know wikipedia has a history of inaccuracy, but i would believe it in this case) is .425, which would fit in nicely among the ranks of inadequacy

I would assume it's because they didn't make the top 10, but I could be wrong. Let me look again.

edit - Nope, I was wrong and you guys were right. I thought it was a statistical list but I was wrong.

Edited by Peyton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the end of this decade that winning percentage will be up. We may be at .500 by 2020.

All the Falcons need is 11 consecutive years of 13-3, and the Falcons will be.......just a game under .500 at the end of 2020.

I don't think the Falcons will ever see a .500 winning percentage, but nobody will care about that if they just win a Super Bowl or two. See the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to look at it as "Under New Management"

Falcons Record BB (Before Blank) 212-327-5 (.6 to 1 win/loss ratio) .411 win pctg

Falcons Record AB (After Blank) 64-63-1 (1.01 to 1 win/loss ratio) .5 win pctg

Even more importantly -

Falcons Record ATD (After TD) 20-12-0 (1.67 to 1 win/loss ratio) .625 win pctg

It's a new regime - new owner, new management.

I think these Falcons are for real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UMMMMMMM..... how come the Saints arent on here? Their winning percentage, according to wikipedia (yes i know wikipedia has a history of inaccuracy, but i would believe it in this case) is .425, which would fit in nicely among the ranks of inadequacy

Last 4 years erased the doubts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...