Jump to content

Times Square suspect Shahzad doesn’t speak for me


JDaveG
 Share

Recommended Posts

Times Square suspect Shahzad doesn’t speak for me

By Zaid Jilani

Two weeks ago, as I traveled to my Washington office at the Center for American Progress think tank, I noticed that the Washington Post-published Express newspaper for the day had splashed the image of Faisal Shahzad, the chief suspect in the failed Times Square car bombing, across its front page alongside the sensationalist headline “MADE IN PAKISTAN.”

This made me grimace. As the Muslim son of Pakistani immigrants, the last thing I wanted to see was the press sensationalizing the birthplace and ethnic identity of Shahzad, leading Americans to believe that Pakistanis or Muslims as a whole approved of vile acts like this attempted attack in Times Square.

And soon enough, many in the media latched onto this narrative that demonized Muslims. Radio host Neal Boortz offensively tweeted, “The Times Square Bomber is a Muslim! Shocker! Who would have believed it?” And CNN contributor Erick Erickson complained that it “really is pathetic that you’re more likely to see the words ‘racist’ and ‘Republican’ together in the newspaper these days than ‘terrorism’ and ‘Islam.’ ”

Yet there is one fact that Erickson didn’t mention that actually wasn’t seen in most American newspapers: One of the men responsible for alerting police to the car bomb was Times Square photograph vendor Aliou Niasse — a Senegalese Muslim.

While two Vietnam vets were credited with discovering the bomb and received lavish praise from the American press, Niasse was the first to spot the bomb and alert fellow vendors to notify the police, the United Kingdom’s Times Online reports.

The radio show “Democracy Now!” tracked down Niasse after the Times report and asked him what he felt about the bombing attempt. Niasse, who doesn’t speak English well, replied that the “Islam religion is not terrorist. Because if I know [shahzad] is Muslim, he do that, if I know that, I’m going to catch him before he run away.”

Unfortunately, stories like Niasse’s that feature Muslims helping fight terror are rarely found in the nation’s newspapers. Most Americans do not know, for instance, that there have been at least six other major terror attacks in the United States prevented due to intelligence provided voluntarily from Muslim communities.

Those of us in the Muslim community have a steep hill to climb to prove to the public that we, just as they do, despise terrorism. But it’s one we’re happy to climb to be part of an American society that is the freest in the world.

While many in the press were happy to describe Pakistan as a hotbed for terrorism, my own recollections are of a totally different country. I remember kids in the streets wearing Levi jeans, families crowded around televisions to watch the latest American romantic comedy film and university students poring over copies of Time magazine.

Admiration for America is so well ingrained in the Pakistani body politic that when Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan’s founder, built the political system of the country, he looked not toward his Asian neighbors but to the U.S. Constitution, hoping that people of all faiths would receive equal rights in his country.

And today, polling shows that extremists are deeply unpopular in the country. According to a Gallup survey conducted last year, only 4 percent of Pakistanis view the extremist group claiming to be linked to the Times Square attack in a positive light. Meanwhile, thousands of Pakistani troops and civilians have died fighting against the very same terrorists that are our common enemy.

We may have disagreements about how to best tackle the problem of terrorism — for example, most Pakistanis oppose drone strikes that tend to kill many civilians and create propaganda for extremists — but one thing is for sure: We Muslim Americans oppose mass murder like that attempted in Times Square just as much as the rest of their countrymen. Aliou Niasse speaks for us, not Faisal Shahzad.

Zaid Jilani, a Kennesaw native, writes for the Progress Report at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we just need the other 1.5 billion people to speak up.

Agreed. It was interesting to me, though, that the participation of Aliou Niasse in reporting the bombing was not reported in the media. I wonder if it's shoddy investigation or just plain sensationalist bias in the media (i.e., they know it won't sell as many papers as if they play to the red meat issue of Islamic participation in the bombing but not the successful thwarting of the same).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.. And CNN contributor Erick Erickson complained that it “really is pathetic that you’re more likely to see the words ‘racist’ and ‘Republican’ together in the newspaper these days than ‘terrorism’ and ‘Islam.’ ”

Don't want you to think I ignored the rest of your post, but that statement there is ridiculous with hipocrisy. He's basically calling others racist while being himself discriminant against Islam. I prefer the term, "Radical Islamist" or "Muslim Extremist" obviously to differentiate between the terrorists and the normal citizens of the country like yourself. I'm sorry the terrorists have given your ethnicity a bad name, and that you have to live with that here. I'm not sorry however for the way the armed forces deal with terrorism. I say that because I don't want to sound like I'm apologizing for the US's COA about terrorism like Obama has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was kidding. I don't think anyone has the responsibility of condemning anyone's actions but their own. I've always found that suggestion pretty ridiculous.

All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.

Do they have the "responsibility?" No. But if I as a Christian fail to condemn the actions of evil Christians (say Roman Catholic priests who abuse their parishioners, or televangelists who steal money), my silence will be taken as assent. That may or may not be fair, but it is how it is. I posted the article because I was frankly refreshed that Zaid Jilani spoke up, and a bit appalled that Aliou Niasse's participation in catching the bomber was not reported more widely. I think things like this need to be said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah blah blah. Some Muslim woman trying to feed herself in Indonesia doesn't have even the tiniest responsibility to keep you from making a clear guilt by association fallacy. The only person responsible for fallacious thoughts is the person who has them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah blah blah. Some Muslim woman trying to feed herself in Indonesia doesn't have even the tiniest responsibility to keep you from making a clear guilt by association fallacy. The only person responsible for fallacious thoughts is the person who has them.

I don't disagree with the first statement. But Muslims in this country are wise to speak up when their fellows in the faith attack our country. Again, I'm not saying they have a responsibility to do it. I'm saying right or wrong silence is seen as assent.

And for the record, I posted this article, so to accuse me of guilt by association when I am posting an article disassociating from guilt is a bit odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with the first statement. But Muslims in this country are wise to speak up when their fellows in the faith attack our country. Again, I'm not saying they have a responsibility to do it. I'm saying right or wrong silence is seen as assent.

And for the record, I posted this article, so to accuse me of guilt by association when I am posting an article disassociating from guilt is a bit odd.

Silence being seen as assent is almost comical to me, to be honest. The idea that someone somehow woes someone something in the entire exchange is absurd.

I wasn't aware I was accusing you of anything. Didn't mean to. Though your silence about the continued fallacy does indicate assent. BYAH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...