sporkdevil Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) Sporkdevil thou "Supreme Falcon" how dare I grow a brain. Listen, your beef with meisn't the fact that I refuse to give an answer that's suitable. Unbeknown to you Ianswered your reply, your highness. Besides, when was the election and why didn'tI have a vote? At what point did you become the "President" of the MB and was held responsible for speaking on behalf of all posters great and small.I will put in bold the obvious questions, but there are a few things calling you just wrong which I guess you could respond to:What team doesn't rely on at least a few good no namers? None of them. I've talked to logic, and logic says it is fairly unlikely to have 53 Hall of Famers on one team at one time.Snelling is backup, behind Norwood and Turner. Yes, Stecker as a 4th string running back isn't great. I knew we should have traded for Adrian Peterson and put him at 4th string, so instead of the few limited plays Stecker had, we would have been able to impress random message board guy who has been a member for a few months.Hayes is a backup FB, who can also play RB. I guess, in theory, he is like 3rd string FB/5th string RB. No, he's not destined for Canton. Quick! Name a "future" Hall of Famer RB currently on New England, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, etc. You know, one of the perennial playoff teams. Well, to be fair, Hayes was on the Steelers. And how many teams keep 4 running backs on their roster? But you expect us to keep 4 backs who should all be able to be "elite"? And why are you complaining about Hill? We dropped a 7th round pick for him. Obviously no one really wanted him. How much less could we get him for? And how is Elam "finally" showing his true colors? He has been automatic for the past almost 20 years. I also find it hilarious that one of the first year we don't push up against the cap, we can't win because we aren't spending money. We are paying out loads of money. And the teams that are pushed up against the cap, aren't the consistent winners. We might not be "elite" yet, but we are a young team. One of the youngest in the leagues. Crazy that some people expect us to have 5 Superbowls a year and a half after we get a new GM.Your reply:I admire your candid response. As a MB poster who has over 6,000+ posts I should respect your knowledge of the game and this team in particular. As a genuis even Einstein was wrong about several of his theories. Michael Jordan missed as many game winning shots as he made. And you sir, are neither. You know the problem(s) with a lot of you "Supreme" posters are that you're long in the tooth and vision impaired by the blinders. All you did was spell genius wrong, and then make general, sweeping statements not related to anything. Like I said you did. Continue growing that "brain". I have no beef with you, just the point that you give no answers. Then you act like you are right. Edited November 29, 2009 by sporkdevil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.