Jump to content

Atlanta the most dangerous 5-5 team?


Recommended Posts

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/don_banks/11/24/things/index.html

Being two days shy of Thanksgiving means there's only six short weeks left in the NFL's regular season. The clock is ticking, so here are some things you need to know as we stare down the stretch run to the playoffs....

• For the past four years in a row, the NFC East has had the uncanny ability to advance a team to the playoffs after it hit late November hovering around .500. To wit:

-- In 2008, the Eagles were 5-5-1, but made it at 9-6-1 and went all the way to the NFC title game.

-- In 2007, the Redskins were 5-5, then 5-7 in the throes of Sean Taylor's death, before riding a four-game season-ending winning streak to a wild-card berth.

-- In 2006, the Eagles were 5-5 and had just lost Donovan McNabb to a season-ending knee injury before backup Jeff Garcia took over and went 5-1 down the stretch, helping Philadelphia to the NFC East title and a playoff win.

-- And in 2005, the Redskins were 5-6 and going nowhere, then caught fire with Mark Brunell at quarterback and won their last five games to finish 10-6 and earn the NFC's final wild-card slot. They too kept things rolling and earned a playoff win.

Who's our late-November dangerous .500 team this year in the NFC East? With both the Eagles and Giants winning Sunday to improve to 6-4, I say we finally have to look to another division to find the NFC team we shouldn't make the mistake of prematurely burying. Can I get a drumroll please for the 5-5 Falcons?

Atlanta has lost four out of five to drop off the radar screen after a strong 4-1 start. But the Falcons' skid coincided with playing four out of five on the road, and they lost at Dallas, at New Orleans, at Carolina and at the Giants, in overtime. No real shame in any of that. No glory, either. But no disgraceful losses.

And now Atlanta gets to head home for a three-game homestand, and four of its last six at the Georgia Dome, where it is 4-0 this season. I foresee the Falcons winning two out of their next three at home, against the Bucs, Eagles and Saints. And then they get to end the season with a trip to the floundering Jets, home against the Bills, and at struggling Tampa Bay. Those last three opponents are a combined 8-22 at the moment.

Add it all up and a 10-6 finish still looks eminently reachable for Atlanta, which currently stands eighth in the NFC, two spots removed from the six-team playoff field. Atlanta is 4-4 in the NFC, but a 7-5 conference record might just be good enough for the Falcons to snare a wild-card berth and end their mind-boggling streak of 43 years without back-to-back playoff seasons.

• Speaking of the NFC East, with the Cowboys, Eagles and Giants all at least two games over .500, the division looks primed to advance at least two teams to the playoffs for a league-best fifth consecutive year (2005-2009), eighth time this decade, and a whopping 17th time in the past 21 years (1989-09). The NFC East actually featured three playoff teams in both 2006 and 2007, and no other division even comes close to its level of playoff representation in the past two decades.

But a word of caution to the NFC East champion, whomever that might wind up being: In three of the past four seasons, the division winner has lost its playoff opener at home (the Giants in 2008 and 2005, the Cowboys in 2007), with only the 2006 Eagles bucking the trend by winning even one playoff game. In those seasons, a wild-card entry from the division has advanced further than the champion three times (2008 Eagles, 2007 Giants, 2005 Redskins).

• Do you realize that if the AFC playoffs began today, the Jaguars (6-4) would somehow be the No. 5 seed in the postseason, one spot ahead of the defending champion Steelers (6-4)? The Jaguars are a turnaround team that turned around when no one was looking, but here they are, having gone 6-2 after an 0-2 start.

Jacksonville's 5-2 AFC record is the best of the conference's wild-card contenders, and it has won three in a row by a combined margin of just eight points. Maybe the lack of attention for the Jaguars has something to do with this: They've scored 199 points and allowed 235 points, the worst differential (minus-36) of any NFL team with a winning record.

• I happen to think the Broncos are toast in the AFC West, and here's one reason why: Denver is on a four-game losing streak after starting the season 6-0, and it's the ninth time since the 1970 merger the Broncos have dropped at least four straight. The first eight times it happened, Denver didn't recover in time to make the playoffs, and only once finished with a winning record (9-7 in 2006).

Then again, Denver never had a six-game winning streak in any of those other eight seasons, let alone to start the year.

• With Arizona at 7-3 and Pittsburgh at 6-4, last season's Super Bowl loser is out-performing last season's Super Bowl winner for only the third time all decade. And for the second time, the Steelers are involved. In 2006, Seattle went 9-7 and won the NFC West while defending champion Pittsburgh slumped to 8-8 and out of the playoffs. In 2000, the losing Titans returned strong at 13-3, winning the AFC Central, while St. Louis dropped to 10-6 and a wild-card berth in the NFC West.

• If the playoffs began today, the 12-team postseason would feature six new teams and six repeat qualifiers from last year. In the AFC, the new teams would be the Bengals, Jaguars and Patriots (who didn't make the playoffs last year, even if it feels like they did). In the NFC, the newbies would be the Saints, Cowboys and Packers. Of those six, all of them have made the postseason at least once since 2005.

In the AFC, the playoff repeaters would be the very familiar Colts, Chargers and Steelers. In the NFC, the Vikings, Cardinals and Eagles would return for another crack at winning a ring.

• If it seems like the Colts, Patriots and Steelers are always in the AFC playoffs, it's with good reason. If at least two of them make this year's Super Bowl tournament, it would be the ninth consecutive season that that happened. The 2000 season was the last time the AFC field included just one of those three perennial powerhouses (the Colts made it that year, but not New England or Pittsburgh).

And get this: The last time none of the AFC's Big Three made it to the postseason? Way back in 1991, the most recent season the Colts, Patriots and Steelers all had losing records in the same year. This season will mark the 18th consecutive year that someone out of the Colts-Patriots-Steelers triumvirate will be playoff bound.

• As Bill Parcells loves to remind us from time to time -- no matter his NFL address of the moment -- you are what your record says you are. You don't get an asterisk for close losses, near misses or shouldas, wouldas, couldas. But ... when you consider the 10-0 Colts have won their last four games by a combined 10 points, while the 7-3 Patriots have lost their three games by a combined 11 points -- and two of those were against the Jets and Broncos when they were red-hot -- should we really convince ourselves there's a legitimate three-game gap between Indianapolis and New England? I'd say the one point that separated these two rivals in Week 10's 35-34 instant classic in Indy sounds more like it.

• Don't look now, but last year's turnaround teams are turning around yet again. Miami, Baltimore and Atlanta went a combined 10-38 in 2007, then took the NFL by storm last season, with each of them going 11-5 and making the playoffs under rookie head coaches.

But that's so last year in the NFL. The Dolphins, Ravens and Falcons are all 5-5 this season and would finish out of the playoffs if the season ended today. Their combined 15-15 record means they have to go 18-0 from here on out in order to match last year's 33-15 mark.

I don't like their chances.

• Almost anyone's MVP ballot includes the names of Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Brett Favre, and they're all deserving candidates playing the game's premier position. But ho-hum. If you want a wildly unconventional pick that puts the V into valuable, how could you find a starker example than Steelers safety Troy Polamalu?

But he's missed five games with knee injuries, you say? That's exactly our point. When Polamalu has been sidelined, the 6-4 defending Super Bowl champion Steelers have lost at Chicago, at Cincinnati, and at Kansas City, with another loss at home against the Bengals when he was injured and had to leave the game after Cincinnati's opening possession.

When he both started and finished the game, Pittsburgh is 3-0. When he has appeared in a game, the Steelers are 4-1, as opposed to their 2-3 record without him. Now that's value that doesn't require any overstatement.

• The Bengals suffered their first road loss of the year Sunday at Oakland, and that cost the NFL the chance to have four teams start a season 5-0 on the road for the first time ever. Obviously the Saints and Colts are undefeated away from home, but the real surprise is that the 7-3 Cardinals are 5-0 on the road after going just 3-5 in that department last season, getting blown out by at least 21 points four different times.

The Cardinals have a decent shot to run the table on the road this year. Their remaining road games are at Tennessee (4-6), at San Francisco (4-6) and at Detroit (2-8). Those teams are a combined 7-7 at home.

• Was it mere coincidence that Chicago's Jay Culter and Denver's Kyle Orton both threw for 171 yards with one interception on Sunday, with both losing crucial games at home? The Bears and Broncos are a combined 10-10 this season and both look headed for non-playoff years despite Chicago starting 3-1 and Denver getting off to that 6-0 burst. All of which renders the NFL's biggest head-to-head trade of starting quarterbacks in years as much ado about very little.

• Lastly, I'm struck by the realization that Detroit, Dallas and Denver are the only three NFL cities that begin with D, and all three are hosting Thanksgiving games for the first time ever in the same year. There must be some larger meaning to that. Let's see if they all win on Thursday playing some mean D-fense.

My opinion:

I think we can definitely get 5 more wins. I even think we can run the table even though its very unlikely. We can only lose won more game and that game cannot be against the Eagles, so overall, I like our chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hits the nail on the head. We have had a ridiculously hard schedule thus far, and while it's true that we need to play better against good teams on the road, all of our losses have been completely understandable.

The rest of our schedule is MUCH more favorable, and I see 10-6 as a very good possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to sound pessimistic but this team has not been consistent all year. Some games we struggle early and by the second half when we get it together it's too late. Then there's been those games that we start fast, score early and cannot maintain the same level of play for the full game. If they truly want to make the playoffs this year then they'd better start playing all out, like we're already in the playoffs, this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah this is actually a good article. We haven't lost to a bad team yet - and none of our losses were terrible (except for Dallas), but people have to remember this is just the second year of our process :D I know that's obvious but people expect Matt Ryan to be Peyton Manning in only his second year, and they expect us to win against great teams with a little under average defense. I still have all the faith ever in our Falcons and I always will. I'm glad to see there's other positive people out there who give us credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah this is actually a good article. We haven't lost to a bad team yet - and none of our losses were terrible (except for Dallas), but people have to remember this is just the second year of our process :D I know that's obvious but people expect Matt Ryan to be Peyton Manning in only his second year, and they expect us to win against great teams with a little under average defense. I still have all the faith ever in our Falcons and I always will. I'm glad to see there's other positive people out there who give us credit.

What I like about your comment is that if you do not lose to bad teams the ultimately you start beating the good teams

and the time for that has come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to sound pessimistic but this team has not been consistent all year. Some games we struggle early and by the second half when we get it together it's too late. Then there's been those games that we start fast, score early and cannot maintain the same level of play for the full game. If they truly want to make the playoffs this year then they'd better start playing all out, like we're already in the playoffs, this Sunday.

I'm with you. All this talk about what we can do is meaningless. I've got to see it from this team and so far we really haven't. Sure, we've had a tough schedule but I feel like we're hearing a bunch of excuses more than anything. They need to play more consistently for me to believe we're gonna make a run at the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1-5 on the road is not "understandable" especially for a "playoff" team, and especially for a "playoff" team that will have to play all of its playoff games on the road. even if we somehow pull off a miracle and make the playoffs, this team is doomed in the playoffs and WILL lose in the first round... because it can't play well on the road.

Edited by taylor228193
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1-5 on the road is not "understandable" especially for a "playoff" team, and especially for a "playoff" team that will have to play all of its playoff games on the road. even if we somehow pull off a miracle and make the playoffs, this team is doomed in the playoffs and WILL lose in the first round... because it can't play well on the road.

I agree.

That said, if we stop beating ourselves like we did in New Orleans and Carolina it really wouldn't be far fetched to get a road win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is losing to the Giants, Panthers, and Cowgirls respectable. Jesus, being the "most dangerous" 5-5 team is like being the smartest ******.

Pi55 poor analogy. Any road game in the NFL is tough and everyone of the losses you mention above was on the road. I swear... some of you act like we lost to the Raiders at home. As much as I hate losing none of the games we've lost this year have been that surprising. Especially considering the amount of teams we've played coming off a bye week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice article. Thanks for sharing. I think we ARE the most dangerous team with a 5 - 5 record. If the other teams who are 5 - 5 or worse, had had to play our schedule, they wouldn't even be in contention for a Wild Card right now.

The league murdered us with our schedule this year...I mean, what did we do to pizz 'em off so bad??? And the thing is, we're 5 and 5, and still in the "hunt" in spite of that. So, I think when our full compliment of backs returns, Elam gets his head out of his arsk, and "Matty Ice" continues to get his "Mojo" back, we'll be ah-ight.

GO, YOU DIRTY BIRDS!!!

FalconJim.

Edited by FalconJim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the dumbest thing I have read in a long time. 5-5 isn't dangerous, it's passive. You have lost every game to a potential playoff team. WTF????? Dangerous??? Please.......A dam* puddy tat

All 3 of those games were on the road, and 2 of those teams were coming off of a bye week.

One thing to remember is that we started 6-4 last season, then finished on a 5-1 tear to end at 11-5.

If we can finish 5-1 again this season, we'll be 10-6 and in a good position to snag one of the wild card spots. I think the Packers are going to get one of the wild cards, so we need to take care of business against the Eagles, and hope that the G-Men finish with a worse record than us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is that this team has the potential to be very dangerous .. Coach Smith and co. will bring it together and get this team straight! I don't think we're a definitive Super Bowl contender "yet", but we do have potential. Remember, this is only Coach Smith's second year and also Matt Ryan's. It takes time to build a great team ... we have some holes to fill for next season, mainly on defense, but we have a GM that knows what he's doing, a head coach that has brought this team together and made them believe in themselves, and an owner who wants a winner more than anything else. PEACE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice write up, but you can forget all of that. If Ryan keeps the same mojo that he had in the second half of the Giants game we do have a legitimate shot. Even with this bend and break defense. Ryan looked like Matty Ice in those last 2 quarters. He was moving up in the pocket and kept his vision downfield. Jenkins holds on to that ball in the end zone and who know? Let's hope he's back for real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I get a drumroll please for the 5-5 Falcons?

Atlanta has lost four out of five to drop off the radar screen after a strong 4-1 start. But the Falcons' skid coincided with playing four out of five on the road, and they lost at Dallas, at New Orleans, at Carolina and at the Giants, in overtime. No real shame in any of that. No glory, either. But no disgraceful losses.

And now Atlanta gets to head home for a three-game homestand, and four of its last six at the Georgia Dome, where it is 4-0 this season. I foresee the Falcons winning two out of their next three at home, against the Bucs, Eagles and Saints. And then they get to end the season with a trip to the floundering Jets, home against the Bills, and at struggling Tampa Bay. Those last three opponents are a combined 8-22 at the moment.

Add it all up and a 10-6 finish still looks eminently reachable for Atlanta, which currently stands eighth in the NFC, two spots removed from the six-team playoff field. Atlanta is 4-4 in the NFC, but a 7-5 conference record might just be good enough for the Falcons to snare a wild-card berth and end their mind-boggling streak of 43 years without back-to-back playoff seasons.

My opinion:

I think we can definitely get 5 more wins. I even think we can run the table even though its very unlikely. We can only lose won more game and that game cannot be against the Eagles, so overall, I like our chances.

I think he copied the article I just posted called My Thoughts on the Season.

I agree totally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...