Turner the Burned-Out Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 (edited) Running Back Production from One Year to Another:Larry Johnson2005-2006 (17 games)1821yards/429carries = 4.2 yds/carry2006-2007 (8 games)559/158 = 3.5Shaun Alexander2004-2005 (18 games)2116/430 = 4.92005-2006 (10 games)896/252 = 3.6Edgerrin James2000-2001 (17 games)1816/408 = 4.52001-2002 (6 games)662/151 = 4.4Jamal Anderson1998-1999 (17 games)2122/480 = 4.41999-2000 (2 games)59/19 = 3.2Michael Turner2008-2009 (17 games)1741/395 = 4.42009-2010 (3 games?)226?/65? = 3.5? Edited October 7, 2009 by Turner the Burned-Out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlanta greatest city Ÿ Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Interesting...I think teams after they see they they were not prepared for it the first year make some major adjustment the next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenzy™® Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 please stop with the anti-Turner names...are you guys even fans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbendon Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Wow. These stats haven't been thrown out there a couple hundred times already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal Line D Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Yawn. Booooooooring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevykev21 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 (edited) Running Back Production from One Year to Another:Larry Johnson2005-2006 (17 games)1821yards/429carries = 4.2 yds/carry2006-2007 (8 games)559/158 = 3.5Shaun Alexander2004-2005 (18 games)2116/430 = 4.92005-2006 (10 games)896/252 = 3.6Edgerrin James2000-2001 (17 games)1816/408 = 4.52001-2002 (6 games)662/151 = 4.4Jamal Anderson1998-1999 (17 games)2122/480 = 4.41999-2000 (2 games)59/19 = 3.2Michael Turner2008-2009 (17 games)1741/395 = 4.42009-2010 (3 games?)56?/15? = 3.5?So you're saying Turner has had 15 carries for a total of 56 yards in 3 games so far this year? Well if this isn't a candidate for the stupidest, no thought/research put into it troll thread I've seen so far this year, then I don't know what is.:wacko:I think you "burned out" all your brain cells coming up with that witty name. Ooh boy, that's a good one, sparky! Edited October 6, 2009 by kevykev21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Falcon Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 9 RBs lead the league in rushing in consecutive years, 4 lead the league 3 years straight, and Jim Brown had the title 5 yers in a row, followed by another 3 consecutive years.Most Consecutive Seasons Leading League:5 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1957-1961 3 Steve Van Buren, Philadelphia, 1947-49 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1963-65 Earl Campbell, Houston, 1978-1980 Emmitt Smith, Dallas, 1991-93 2 Bill Paschal, N.Y. Giants, 1943-44 Joe Perry, San Francisco, 1953-54 Jim Nance, Boston, 1966-67 Leroy Kelly, Cleveland, 1967-68 O.J. Simpson, Buffalo, 1972-73; 1975-76 Eric Dickerson, L.A. Rams, 1983-84 Barry Sanders, Detroit, 1996-97 Edgerrin James, Indianapolis, 1999-2000 LaDainian Tomlinson, San Diego, 2006-07 http://www.nfl.com/history/randf/records/indiv/rushingWhat else you got? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stripedss Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 9 RBs lead the league in rushing in consecutive years, 4 lead the league 3 years straight, and Jim Brown had the title 5 yers in a row, followed by another 3 consecutive years.Most Consecutive Seasons Leading League:5 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1957-1961 3 Steve Van Buren, Philadelphia, 1947-49 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1963-65 Earl Campbell, Houston, 1978-1980 Emmitt Smith, Dallas, 1991-93 2 Bill Paschal, N.Y. Giants, 1943-44 Joe Perry, San Francisco, 1953-54 Jim Nance, Boston, 1966-67 Leroy Kelly, Cleveland, 1967-68 O.J. Simpson, Buffalo, 1972-73; 1975-76 Eric Dickerson, L.A. Rams, 1983-84 Barry Sanders, Detroit, 1996-97 Edgerrin James, Indianapolis, 1999-2000 LaDainian Tomlinson, San Diego, 2006-07 http://www.nfl.com/history/randf/records/indiv/rushingWhat else you got?Look at the dates, there is only one current / present era dte listed. Turner has been used up. We have to find another back to take half the load. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turner the Burned-Out Posted October 6, 2009 Author Share Posted October 6, 2009 9 RBs lead the league in rushing in consecutive years, 4 lead the league 3 years straight, and Jim Brown had the title 5 yers in a row, followed by another 3 consecutive years.Most Consecutive Seasons Leading League:5 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1957-1961 3 Steve Van Buren, Philadelphia, 1947-49 Jim Brown, Cleveland, 1963-65 Earl Campbell, Houston, 1978-1980 Emmitt Smith, Dallas, 1991-93 2 Bill Paschal, N.Y. Giants, 1943-44 Joe Perry, San Francisco, 1953-54 Jim Nance, Boston, 1966-67 Leroy Kelly, Cleveland, 1967-68 O.J. Simpson, Buffalo, 1972-73; 1975-76 Eric Dickerson, L.A. Rams, 1983-84 Barry Sanders, Detroit, 1996-97 Edgerrin James, Indianapolis, 1999-2000 LaDainian Tomlinson, San Diego, 2006-07 http://www.nfl.com/history/randf/records/indiv/rushingWhat else you got?Give me the number of carries they had and we can talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevykev21 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Look at the dates, there is only one current / present era dte listed. Turner has been used up. We have to find another back to take half the load.The late 90's are "current" enough?And Turner is "used up" after one season as the main guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finally Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Don't argue with the trolls. They are morons. You might as well be having a philosophical debate with a toddler. Just ignore this guy or he is going to start multiple threads.Never feed the trolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stripedss Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 The late 90's are "current" enough?And Turner is "used up" after one season as the main guy?No the late 90's are not current enough. ERA = 10yrs. Yes he has been used up. He needs to be rested twice as much this year. Towards the end of the season he will be useless if not rested properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiViK_OuTkAsT™ Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Oh boy, we got a real witty and clever joker on our hands here boys. WOW....We better watch out......sure is a belly buster here. Where on earth do you come up with this stuff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlanta greatest city Ÿ Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Don't argue with the trolls. They are morons. You might as well be having a philosophical debate with a toddler. Just ignore this guy or he is going to start multiple threads.Never feed the trolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevykev21 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 No the late 90's are not current enough. ERA = 10yrs. Yes he has been used up. He needs to be rested twice as much this year. Towards the end of the season he will be useless if not rested properly.A decade is 10 years. And era is a lot longer than that - "The modern era".Turner is "used up" is your opinion, and I disagree with that completely. bThis is stupid..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robb4242 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 No the late 90's are not current enough. ERA = 10yrs. Yes he has been used up. He needs to be rested twice as much this year. Towards the end of the season he will be useless if not rested properly.I guess baseball should be celebrating. The steroid era is over. Afterall, an era is only 10 years, and here I thought that was a decade, not an era. Silly me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosweatboyz Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 please stop with the anti-Turner names...are you guys even fans?yes, when he plays well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jluk Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 of course shaun alexander ypg goes down, you lose a pro-bowl LG named steve hutchinson then it makes sense. u ever watch how well the vikings run?forget larry johnson, you ever saw how solid priest holmes ran? that oline is O-L-D. you can probably combine their time in NFL and it equals some teams. there pro-bowl LT was replaced and they had a vet C who knew how to play.turner is doing fine. we just need our oline to show up in the ground game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phattywankenobi Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 A case study. Wheeeww!!! Gosh you must be a scientist Michael Turnover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiViK_OuTkAsT™ Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 A case study. Wheeeww!!! Gosh you must be a scientist Michael Turnover. Uh, it is clearly obvious he is. Otherwise he would not be able to stun us with these fascinatingly clever names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamPlayer1 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Running Back Production from One Year to Another:Larry Johnson2005-2006 (17 games)1821yards/429carries = 4.2 yds/carry2006-2007 (8 games)559/158 = 3.5Shaun Alexander2004-2005 (18 games)2116/430 = 4.92005-2006 (10 games)896/252 = 3.6Edgerrin James2000-2001 (17 games)1816/408 = 4.52001-2002 (6 games)662/151 = 4.4Jamal Anderson1998-1999 (17 games)2122/480 = 4.41999-2000 (2 games)59/19 = 3.2Michael Turner2008-2009 (17 games)1741/395 = 4.42009-2010 (3 games?)56?/15? = 3.5?Just wow! You show an amazing amount of insight with just three posts. I anxiously await your further copy and paste assessments of RB statistics. However, if you restrict your observations to 2009 season players, your post would carry more weight. Thanks for the stat that Michael Turner had the fewest carries in your examples. So, I guess we have nothing to worry about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stripedss Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Turner will be lucky to break the 1000 yard mark this year. I would be more than happy to be incorrect, but I don't think I will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyhole Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 These could turn out to be his three worst weeks. Let's wait until we have more data to make the comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turner the Burned-Out Posted October 7, 2009 Author Share Posted October 7, 2009 So you're saying Turner has had 15 carries for a total of 56 yards in 3 games so far this year? Well if this isn't a candidate for the stupidest, no thought/research put into it troll thread I've seen so far this year, then I don't know what is.:wacko:I think you "burned out" all your brain cells coming up with that witty name. Ooh boy, that's a good one, sparky!My mistake, I fixed that. Either way, Turner still has a decline in production. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.