millenium falcon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 if we could get him for our 1st and 3rd, i would be ecstatic. i hope someone the chiefs have targeted if there at 24 to sway them to accept #24 and #90 for dorsey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukfalc Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'r trade him for #24 or #55 and Jamaal.Beyong that, I'd be wanting picks back in return, so that we still have 7 picks. E.g. I'd give up our 1st and 2nd, but i'd expect KC's 3rd rounder, or a 4th and 5th rounder, back in return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon82 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 #24 and #90 in a heartbeat ... #24 and #55 with a switch of 3rd round picks (KC has #67) too ... #24 and #55 straight up would be a little too much.KC will want as much as possible, because they would have to take a 18mil cap hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osiruz Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 just the first, or we can all take jerry and feel free to stfu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yesmann Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 my left nut and a mid round draft pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Bill Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Mike Vick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caveman Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I don't think he's big enough for nose tackle -- either in a 4-3 or a 3-4. We just resigned Babs for UT. Soooo.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benny Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I don't think he's big enough for nose tackle -- either in a 4-3 or a 3-4. We just resigned Babs for UT. Soooo....exactly, idk why everyone is on Dorseys nuts, he doesnt fit the hole we have at DT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Return-of-the-Falcon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i really dont want the guy, id give up our 2nd rnder and thats it pretty much, he may turn out to be a superstar, but my gut feeling says we shouldnt trade any more picks and just stick to the draft, and he has that really large contract, that could really hurt our salary cap if he doesnt develop into a top 5 DT in the league....thats just my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DynomiteD Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 my entire checking account!!!$42.87 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 if we could get him for our 1st and 3rd, i would be ecstatic. i hope someone the chiefs have targeted if there at 24 to sway them to accept #24 and #90 for dorsey.that is TOO MUCH for a guy that, while talented, showed little his first year in the NFL.......that is too much to give KC when the player does not fit the new scheme......that is too much to give a guy who has some medical concerns......I would give our #24 overall - nothing more..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caveman Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 It's so funny that we are talking about Dorsey again -- when there was such a split last year about taking him or Ryan at 3.I just don't see how Dorsey fits in unless we stay in a 4-3 AND Babs becomes a backup/ rotation player. KC doesn't feel he fits their scheme because they are going to a 3-4 -- this means not big enough for NT AND evidently not suited for a 3-4 DE either.We just resigned Babs, and I would be suprised if the Falcons felt that Babs and Dorsey could be our starting DT tandem. Of course, the Falcons are talking about running more 3-4 sets, so then we're talking about the same thing as KC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of God Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 This trade may have little affect on our draft, just stay tuned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUfalcon1 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 1st and 3rd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsH8 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 that is TOO MUCH for a guy that, while talented, showed little his first year in the NFL.......that is too much to give KC when the player does not fit the new scheme......that is too much to give a guy who has some medical concerns......I would give our #24 overall - nothing more.....I completely agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchet1984 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 lol how can somebody say "I dont want the guy" when no DT prospect is not even on the same level as Dorsey? Including Raji. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcsfan55 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 nothing. seriously why is everyone so obsessed with him again? passing him up once wasnt enough for us? He did squat for the chiefs, i would rather draft one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchet1984 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 nothing. seriously why is everyone so obsessed with him again? passing him up once wasnt enough for us? He did squat for the chiefs, i would rather draft one.He did squat? Are you ********? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcsfan55 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 He did squat? Are you ********?1 sack and 46 tackles is hardly HOF production, especially at how high he was drafted. The guy was a no show and he did not play like the dominant tackle he was projected to be. Giving up anything more than a 3rd rounder for this guy would be a waste of picks. I would rather draft one. Am I retarted? no, but you may have just bitten into the hype..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam25 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 just the first, or we can all take jerry and feel free to stfulmfao i laughed pretty hard when i read this lol but yea i dont like this dorsey idea i think we just stick with 24 and get a pass rusher or delmas maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchet1984 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 1 sack and 46 tackles is hardly HOF production, especially at how high he was drafted. The guy was a no show and he did not play like the dominant tackle he was projected to be. Giving up anything more than a 3rd rounder for this guy would be a waste of picks. I would rather draft one. Am I retarted? no, but you may have just bitten into the hype.....lol...yeah okay...hes garbage and he sucks because you say so..even though he had decent numbers, also Sapp didn't had fancy numbers in his rookie year either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman123 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 A THIRD AND JAMAAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbendon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 A nickel, 2 pennies, a popsicle stick, and a pinch of belly button lint j/k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre5000 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Thats great.... lets trade multiple picks for a guy that hasnt even close to lived up to high first round status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.