atljbo Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 LinkQuarterback(Name, Team)1 Peyton Manning -- Indianapolis2 Tom Brady -- New England3 Drew Brees -- New Orleans4 Kurt Warner -- Arizona5 Ben Roethlisberger -- Pittsburgh6 Donovan McNabb -- Philadelphia7 Tony Romo -- Dallas8 Philip Rivers -- San Diego9 Jay Cutler -- Chicago10 Eli Manning - New York(Sorry, wasn't quick enough on the draw to grab the QBs' overall ratings)Wide Receiver(Name, Team, Overall Rating)1 Larry Fitzgerald -- Arizona -- 992 Andre Johnson -- Houston -- 983 Steve Smith -- Carolina -- 974 Randy Moss -- New England -- 965 Reggie Wayne -- Indianapolis -- 956 Anquan Boldin -- Arizona -- 94Roddy White -- Atlanta -- 948 Wes Welker -- New England -- 939 Brandon Marshall -- Denver -- 92Calvin Johnson -- Detroit -- 92Tight End(Name, Team, Overall Rating)1 Tony Gonzalez -- Atlanta -- 98 (NICE)2 Jason Witten -- Dallas -- 973 Antonio Gates -- San Diego -- 954 Chris Cooley -- Washington -- 91Dallas Clark -- Indianapolis -- 916 Kellen Winslow -- Tampa Bay -- 90Heath Miller -- Pittsburgh -- 908 Owen Daniels -- Houston -- 899 John Carlson -- Seattle -- 8710 Jeremy Shockey -- New Orleans -- 86Running Back(Name, Team, Overall Rating)1 Adrian Peterson -- Minnesota -- 982 Brian Westbrook -- Philadelphia -- 973 Michael Turner -- Atlanta -- 95DeAngelo Williams -- Carolina -- 955 Clinton Portis -- Washington -- 94LaDanian Tomlinson -- San Diego -- 947 Steven Jackson -- St. Louis -- 93Frank Gore -- San Francisco -- 939 Maurice Jones-Drew -- Jacksonville -- 9210 Marion Barber -- Dallas -- 91Defenders(Name, Team, Position, Overall Rating)1 Albert Haynesworth -- Washington -- DT -- 99Ed Reed -- Baltimore -- FS -- 99Troy Polamalu -- Pittsburgh -- SS -- 99Nnamdi Asomugha -- Oakland -- CB -- 99Jared Allen -- Minnesota -- DE -- 996 James Harrison -- Pittsburgh -- OLB - 98Justin Tuck -- New York Giants -- DE -- 98DeMarcus Ware -- Dallas -- OLB -- 98Adrian Wilson -- Arizona -- SS -- 98Patrick Willis -- San Francisco -- MLB -- 98Next up were the movers and shakers, the players who have had seen the biggest year-on-year swing (either positively or negatively) in their overall Madden rating. First up, the bad news:ShakersDeAngelo Hall -- Washington CBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 93 LMAOMadden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 68Difference: -25Matt Leinart -- Arizona QBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 85Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 62Difference: -23Devin Thomas--Washington WRMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 81Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 63Difference: -18Torrey Holt -- Jacksonville WRMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 96Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 84Difference: -12Fred Smoot -- Washington CBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 87Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 76Difference: -11Finally, take a look at the players who improved most from the previous Madden game. You'll notice more than one rookie on this list:MoversChris Johnson -- Oakland CBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 67Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 82Difference: +14Steve Slaton -- Houston RBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 74Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 87Difference: +13DeAngelo Williams--Carolina RBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 84Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 95Difference: +11Matt Forte -- Chicago RBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 80Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 89Difference: +9Matt Cassel -- Kansas City QBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 76Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 83Difference: +7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GANDI Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 MATT RYAN ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimsmusic™ Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 MATT RYAN ?they like to put crybabies first (rivers) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GANDI Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 they like to put crybabies first (rivers) I know that sucks .... But im sure he improved at least 9 pts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atljbo Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 Matt Ryan should be around 86,87, or 88 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarvelFalcon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i understand Dhall aint quiet playin to his potential but **** a 68?! thats a bit much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dem Birds Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I don't how some have gone DOWN since the final season update. Roddy was a 96 on the last update. Now a 94? Ryan was an 88 or 89, he better ATLEAST still be that if not better. Turner is the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i understand Dhall aint quiet playin to his potential but **** a 68?! thats a bit muchI was never big fan of DHAL but i agree....68 is too steep...i think 80 i doable.Also Ryen should be going up to 87 atleast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~SEAMILL~ Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I was never big fan of DHAL but i agree....68 is too steep...i think 80 i doable.Also Ryen should be going up to 87 atleast.In the online roster updates he is an 89. So he should be at least that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Falcon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I would give white a 93 ratingturner an 89 (he needs two great years to go up for me)and gonzo a 102 (i am aware thats not possible)and dhall isnt THAT bad. If he was, the skins wouldn't be paying him so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeDemBirds60 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Nice just take Romo out insert Ryan (90)and it would be wonderful cant wait til it comes out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattIceRyanMVP2 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 ShakersDeAngelo Hall -- Washington CBMadden NFL 09 Overall Rating: 93Madden NFL 10 Overall Rating: 68Difference: -25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMoreVick Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 A Falcon or Raiders fan must be working at EA. A 68 for Hall? ****. You get a 68 just for walking onto the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilleniumFalcon Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 The offensive players should love using The Falcons now. If the defense is decent, all the people will be using the Falcons once again (like they did in the Vick era). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufasa Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 ****, Ryan could be 12 OVR, and still pass for 300 yards a game with that O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miKevicK777 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i mean come on tho loldhall wsant that bad last year to get that bad of a ratinghe did pretty good in dc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derrty bird Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 how is Calvin Johnson at the bottom of that listthey probably didn't want to make Detroit's overall rating too high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarlaac food Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i think that it's important to note that the ratings scale was completely re-tooled this year. the spread between the best in the league and an average starter was increased dramatically, making high ratings even more valuable, but a low rating (60s-70s) is no longer terrible. The players who are the best in the elague will now play like they are that much better than everyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcons Ace Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 i think that it's important to note that the ratings scale was completely re-tooled this year. the spread between the best in the league and an average starter was increased dramatically, making high ratings even more valuable, but a low rating (60s-70s) is no longer terrible. The players who are the best in the elague will now play like they are that much better than everyone else.This Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.