Captain Falcon Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 1st - Defensive tackle (or trade this pick for Dorsey)2nd - Safety3rd - Tight End4th - Offensive Tackle5th - Inside linebacker6th - Corner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman123 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 i say 1st CB 2nd saftey3rd D-linemen4th LB5th1 TE5th2 OL 6th WR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman123 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 why would we trade our first for dorsey he aint do nothing last year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman123 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 id say a 3rd or 4th, mabye even 5th for dorsey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formul8or Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 id say a 3rd or 4th, mabye even 5th for dorseyWe'd be lucky to get them to take the #24 pick for Dorsey. Players stocks don't just freefall after one season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattIceRyanMVP2 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 1st round pick for Dorsey? NO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muskokas finest © Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 1st - Defensive tackle (or trade this pick for Dorsey)2nd - Safety3rd - Tight End4th - Offensive Tackle5th - Inside linebacker6th - CornerNo OLB? #1 IMO. Good players likely available at that position when we pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessie'sHammers Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 1st - Defensive tackle (or trade this pick for Dorsey)2nd - Safety3rd - Tight End4th - Offensive Tackle5th - Inside linebacker6th - Corner1st - DT2nd - S/CB3rd - OLB4th - TE5th - OT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unconquered. Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 these posts do not get annoying at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconsPhan4LIfe Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I just hope we get some defensive help first pick...PLEASE NOT PETTIGREW!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Kent™ Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 1st - Defensive tackle (or trade this pick for Dorsey)2nd - Safety3rd - Tight End4th - Offensive Tackle5th - Inside linebacker6th - CornerThe only DT who is arguably worth taking in the 1st that we could draft would be Ziggy Hood..... maybe Jerry. We are going to need a LB WAY before the 5th and it won't be an ILB either. I'd also put DE in the top 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchet1984 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I think LB in the first or trade for Dorsey in the first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalcoChicquera Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 The problem with this kind of approach is that it takes no account of who will be on the board at a certain point.If this draft class was equally as talented at all positions, then we could employ this method. However:At #24, there is likely to be a premium linebacker available (Cushing, Matthews, Laurinaitis, Maualuga) whereas there probably won't be a 1st round grade DT on the board (Raji and Jerry gone, Hood is not 1st round). Additionally, what if Malcom Jenkins slips - are you really going to pass him up to take Hood or even Ron Brace???Likewise safety in the second - if Delmas, Chung and Moore are gone, but Michael Johnson and Max Unger are still on the board, do you really think reaching for Rashard Johnson or Chip Vaughn is the best move?I'm sure like most teams, we tier players based on BOTH need AND talent. Just because Josh Freeman is the best rated player on Mayock's board when we pick at #'24, doesn't mean we pick him, but equally if Raji/Jerry/Hood/Brace have all gone, doesn't mean we take Moala at #24 just because our biggest need is DT.I think your assessment of our needs is to an extent valid, although I would go1. DT2. SAM LB3. Pass Rush DE4. SS5. TE6. OT7. CBBut the "when we will draft them" part of your statement does leave me very confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caddieman Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Why does every one say DT with the 1st???? Just stupid! All the 1st round DT will be gone. This is one of the worst years for DT in a long time. So you guys want to spend a #24 for a DT rated in the 2nd round? Just stupid! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.