FalconPio 604 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Dont know how to do the link but.... nfl.com is where you go.just think for a second though... how does aaron curry sound to us?Like i said, just a thought Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miKevicK777 151 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 i was thinking about it toobut the prob is we got many needs and td really wants to build thru the draftand if we trade for that 2 pick, were gonna have to get rid of alot of draft picks.i would think our 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th for like their 1st, 5th, and 6thand to have like 1 pick in the first 4 rounds wouldnt be ideal in my opinioni want curry too, but i think we have too many needs in starters and depth players Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D^3 12 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 No, too much money. Though I'd like to have Curry. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duff_Man 12,058 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Dont know how to do the link but.... nfl.com is where you go.just think for a second though... how does aaron curry sound to us?Like i said, just a thought Well of course. Getting Laurent Robinson is LIKE getting the #2 overall pick. Shrewd cap maneuvering. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Snellvillain 26 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Well of course. Getting Laurent Robinson is LIKE getting the #2 overall pick. Shrewd cap maneuvering.Wait...what? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconPio 604 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Share Posted April 7, 2009 Wait...what? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconPio 604 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Share Posted April 7, 2009 i was thinking about it toobut the prob is we got many needs and td really wants to build thru the draftand if we trade for that 2 pick, were gonna have to get rid of alot of draft picks.i would think our 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th for like their 1st, 5th, and 6thand to have like 1 pick in the first 4 rounds wouldnt be ideal in my opinioni want curry too, but i think we have too many needs in starters and depth playerswell yea it would be a hard trade but 1st 2nd AND 3rd? idk about that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falconfanatic365 135 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Maybe if they had traded their #2 overall pick last year for more picks they wouldn't be picking #2 again. Thank goodness they didn't or we wouldn't have Ryan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SWIFT HITTER 1,016 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Jammal Anderson and Vick package with our 7th round ..make it happen Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jessie'sHammers 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 No, too much money. Though I'd like to have Curry.Agree. It's costs too much both in terms of salary & guaranteed money to a rookie. As well as too expensive in respect of the draft picks you would have to forego & the extra money you would have to pay veterans to replace the would be rookies on your roster.Trades such as this won't happen until a rookie cap comes into effect under the new CBA. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bossFALCON™ 2,178 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 we should have traded laurent for that 2. FIRE TD!!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DomeDefense 15 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Jammal Anderson and Vick package with our 7th round ..make it happenwith those we can trade them for a happy meal!!! MC here i come... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
goldenfalcon 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Wait...what?Im over here dying off that comment!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
great white hope 72 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 They should just let us have it. Not like they won't have it again next year anyway :P... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Osiruz 10,079 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 we'd get it if we trade this and next years first plus vick maybe...lol nah it'll cost us way too much. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jedi-Falcon 40 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Considering how we handled the Robinson trade, we would likely end up with the #2 pick IN THE 5TH ROUND.No Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thestufford 151 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 lets give them back their positions on the pics they gave us for LR.... That would make the trade make a little more sense Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tax-Falcon 108 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Considering how we handled the Robinson trade, we would likely end up with the #2 pick IN THE 5TH ROUND.No Thanks. :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duff_Man 12,058 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Well of course. Getting Laurent Robinson is LIKE getting the #2 overall pick. Shrewd cap maneuvering.For anyone who didn't pick up on it, the above comment was pure sarcasm. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconPio 604 Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Considering how we handled the Robinson trade, we would likely end up with the #2 pick IN THE 5TH ROUND.No Thanks.all c'mon jedi....... you still sound kind of upset :P Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CraigSmackDaddy 2,006 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I think it's funny that everyone wants the players at the top of the board but no one wants to pay them. Lions and Rams are trying to trade off their top picks to move down. I personally don't see a need to go that high but if we could trade up high enough to land Rajii that would be cool with me, it won't happen though. I just hope Matthews falls to 24.... if we didn't pick him I'd be upset though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MSalmon 10,998 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 as crazy as that trade sounds at first glance, if TD and Smith were completely sold that Curry was a game changing Lawerence Taylor type i'd be for it. I--Those guys don't come around very often. t would probably cost us the first a second, maybe next years first. And maybe our 3rd this year as well. But impact playmakers are hard to find.The problem is this: is he really an LT type of guy? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Abe 1,038 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 From what I have read the last few days the best value is right close to where we are picking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconPio 604 Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 From what I have read the last few days the best value is right close to where we are picking.i have not read this anywhere but it sounds like its right Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pured-hallfan 27 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 WE have our 3 LBs we will add Casillas in the 3rd to compete at the Weak side and be done Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.