DirtyBirdNorth Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>"> name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swami57 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Sherman makes sense. It doesn't surprise me that the large corporate media outlets are up in arms about the compensation issue when the people who run them stand to lose the most. Once we get out of this mess there should be caps on all executive compensation for ANY publicly held corporation based on a standard formula. Those million dollar a month salaries should be going to the shareholders.It's obvious that starting in the 90s, corporate executives decided they deserved to be paid like rock stars or pro athletes. This is why the free market needs regulation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.