pencilpusher. just because Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 yea....MMMMkay/sign that paper or I will kill a puppy!NAACP says bank giants steered blacks to bad loansBy JESSE WASHINGTON, AP National Writer Jesse Washington, Ap National Writer – Thu Mar 12, 11:25 pm ETThe NAACP is accusing Wells Fargo and HSBC of forcing blacks into subprime mortgages while whites with identical qualifications got lower rates.Class-action lawsuits will be filed against the banks Friday in federal court in Los Angeles, Austin Tighe, co-lead counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, told The Associated Press.Black homebuyers have been 3 1/2 times more likely to receive a subprime loan than white borrowers, and six times more likely to get a subprime rate when refinancing, Tighe said. Blacks still were disproportionately steered into subprime loans when their credit scores, income and down payment were equal to those of white homebuyers, he said.Both Wells Fargo & Co. and HSBC are receiving federal bailout funds. Messages left after hours with the banks were not immediately returned.Amara Weaver of Milwaukee bought her first home in 1984, receiving a 6.25 percent fixed-rate mortgage. She says she had a steady job as a human resources director for a social services agency, never missed a mortgage payment and maintained excellent credit.In 2004, she wanted to buy the house next door for her son to live in. She said the bank promised her a low fixed rate for a $40,000 loan, but at the closing, when reading the fine print, she noticed that the rate was actually 11 percent."I was blown away," said Weaver, an NAACP member. "I didn't have any choice (but to sign) ... it made me feel violated."Similar NAACP lawsuits are pending against a dozen other subprime lenders."This is systematic, institutionalized racism," Tighe said. "Once you take out factors relative to income and credit risk, the only difference between the borrowers is the color of their skin."Tighe estimated that "tens of thousands" of blacks had been forced into bad loans, but said it was difficult to gauge the scope of the problem because banks keep much of their internal data private. The lawsuits could force banks to divulge closely guarded information, such as how banks can determine the race of a loan applicant and how federal bailout funds are being spent.The NAACP is seeking reforms from the banks such as increased transparency in the loan process, educational outreach and internal training. Didn't have a choice but to sign? WTF? I aint gonna deny racism may go on in the lending practices, but NO one can force ANYone to sign on to a loan. If you read the terms and don't like them , don't sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 This has been bothering me for weeks, it's not just a black/white/Asian problem, it's a personal responsibility issue, in the US we seem to think EVERYONE else is to blame for our own stupidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
octoslash Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Actually, the government FORCED the banks to hand out bad loans, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.C. Collins Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 ...... I had no choice but to sign? What about the choice of not signing?Politicians won't ruin this country.....the dumb citizens will...holy ****! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statick Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I saw this news just this morning.OMG. The NAACP needs to stop. Nobody twisted their arms to sign those loan contracts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritzblitz 2.0 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 In 2004, she wanted to buy the house next door for her son to live in. She said the bank promised her a low fixed rate for a $40,000 loan, but at the closing, when reading the fine print, she noticed that the rate was actually 11 percent."I was blown away," said Weaver, an NAACP member. "I didn't have any choice (but to sign) ... it made me feel violated."Really? Who was her loan officer, Vito Corleone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted March 13, 2009 Author Share Posted March 13, 2009 I saw this news just this morning.OMG. The NAACP needs to stop. Nobody twisted their arms to sign those loan contracts.And as I said in an older thread, it is stuff like this that allows the banks to act like this. Don't like the terms..don't sign. After losing so many loans and the interest eventually the banks will have to act smarter. Well..would have been forced to act smarter in the past, now they can just get a bail out. So it has come to no one having to take personal responsibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritzblitz 2.0 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 And as I said in an older thread, it is stuff like this that allows the banks to act like this. Don't like the terms..don't sign. After losing so many loans and the interest eventually the banks will have to act smarter. Well..would have been forced to act smarter in the past, now they can just get a bail out. So it has come to no one having to take personal responsibility.You have to be strong enough to walk away from a deal. If a bank or car dealer senses that you aren't, then they have you by the balls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I saw this news just this morning.OMG. The NAACP needs to stop. Nobody twisted their arms to sign those loan contracts.But why? They are doing such great work in advancing their people. They had a funeral for the "N-Word" a couple of years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statick Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 But why? They are doing such great work in advancing their people. They had a funeral for the "N-Word" a couple of years ago. That's why I'm not a member.They're obsolete and have lost their way. W.E.B. DuBois is turning over in his grave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Actually, the government FORCED the banks to hand out bad loans, yes.So did the government also force people to go out an BUY homes under horrible terms? I'd love to know what weapon was being held to this woman's head as she was FORCED to sign this contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 And as I said in an older thread, it is stuff like this that allows the banks to act like this. Don't like the terms..don't sign. After losing so many loans and the interest eventually the banks will have to act smarter. Well..would have been forced to act smarter in the past, now they can just get a bail out. So it has come to no one having to take personal responsibility.My god don't say that. A person with actual Individual values and not a sheep following a party? Respect points for PP!! (not that anyone cares ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.C. Collins Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I saw this news just this morning.OMG. The NAACP needs to stop. Nobody twisted their arms to sign those loan contracts.Not only that...They are suing the Banks that are already in trouble and causing a lot of the economic turmoil.I know lets sue them and just make things worse. Good thinking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I'm suing the NAACP for this lawsuit. I'm claiming that they don't help out the white people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I'm suing the NAACP for this lawsuit. I'm claiming that they don't help out the white people.The NAACP, does have white members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 The NAACP, does have white members.I'm talkin about full white not mixed and no white suppermist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrews_31 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 The NAACP needs to give this shyt a rest!! These azzclowns do not speak for me!!So did the government also force people to go out an BUY homes under horrible terms? I'd love to know what weapon was being held to this woman's head as she was FORCED to sign this contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-and-Black Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 This has been bothering me for weeks, it's not just a black/white/Asian problem, it's a personal responsibility issue, in the US we seem to think EVERYONE else is to blame for our own stupidity.Nail on the head.This story makes me lose more faith in humanity, as if I had much left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brak'shere Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 yea....MMMMkay/sign that paper or I will kill a puppy!NAACP says bank giants steered blacks to bad loansBy JESSE WASHINGTON, AP National Writer Jesse Washington, Ap National Writer – Thu Mar 12, 11:25 pm ETThe NAACP is accusing Wells Fargo and HSBC of forcing blacks into subprime mortgages while whites with identical qualifications got lower rates.Class-action lawsuits will be filed against the banks Friday in federal court in Los Angeles, Austin Tighe, co-lead counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, told The Associated Press.Black homebuyers have been 3 1/2 times more likely to receive a subprime loan than white borrowers, and six times more likely to get a subprime rate when refinancing, Tighe said. Blacks still were disproportionately steered into subprime loans when their credit scores, income and down payment were equal to those of white homebuyers, he said.Both Wells Fargo & Co. and HSBC are receiving federal bailout funds. Messages left after hours with the banks were not immediately returned.Amara Weaver of Milwaukee bought her first home in 1984, receiving a 6.25 percent fixed-rate mortgage. She says she had a steady job as a human resources director for a social services agency, never missed a mortgage payment and maintained excellent credit.In 2004, she wanted to buy the house next door for her son to live in. She said the bank promised her a low fixed rate for a $40,000 loan, but at the closing, when reading the fine print, she noticed that the rate was actually 11 percent."I was blown away," said Weaver, an NAACP member. "I didn't have any choice (but to sign) ... it made me feel violated."Similar NAACP lawsuits are pending against a dozen other subprime lenders."This is systematic, institutionalized racism," Tighe said. "Once you take out factors relative to income and credit risk, the only difference between the borrowers is the color of their skin."Tighe estimated that "tens of thousands" of blacks had been forced into bad loans, but said it was difficult to gauge the scope of the problem because banks keep much of their internal data private. The lawsuits could force banks to divulge closely guarded information, such as how banks can determine the race of a loan applicant and how federal bailout funds are being spent.The NAACP is seeking reforms from the banks such as increased transparency in the loan process, educational outreach and internal training. Didn't have a choice but to sign? WTF? I aint gonna deny racism may go on in the lending practices, but NO one can force ANYone to sign on to a loan. If you read the terms and don't like them , don't sign.Unfortunately people buy into the victim mentality. Instant gratification has played a big role in the financial problems facing most people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Unfortunately people buy into the victim mentality. Instant gratification has played a big role in the financial problems facing most people.As a collective we've let that happen in this country, we're raising a generation right now full of spoiled, self-centered victims right now.. it has got to change. It can be seen in schools, in kids sports league (let's not keep score so nobody gets their feelings hurt) and in general day to day life, it's everyone at fault except the person who is truly at fault. It's sickening. I know it sounds crotchety but the current generation in High School all the way through Elementary School is a complete mess, there are some great kids but the rotten apples are spoiling the lot. If there's one good thing that comes out of a deep recession maybe it will slow some of the instant gratification seekers who now have to actually worry about money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryowens__ Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Actually, the government FORCED the banks to hand out bad loans, yes.In 1995, the government FORCED the banks to end their racial discrimination practices in lending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryowens__ Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Didn't have a choice but to sign? WTF? I aint gonna deny racism may go on in the lending practices, but NO one can force ANYone to sign on to a loan. If you read the terms and don't like them , don't sign.Easy for you to say if you didn't put up any earnest money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryowens__ Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Man, some of you guys really have no clue. I'm no advocate of the NAACP but when it comes to the financial crisis, much of the cause stems from lenders' discrimination practices. That's why Clinton demanded reform for Fannie and Freddie. And when he proved just how profitable REGULATED lending to middle and low income minority families could be, that's when the private sector impeached him, changed the rules, deregulated the lending industry, and sunk their teeth into the windfall.How many of you guys have actually purchased a home??Do you guys know what earnest money is or what happens to it if you default on a closing??It's not so easy for some people just to walk away from the table after they've already put a deposit down on a contract, even if they misunderstood the terms or the terms were misrepresented to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerosmith67 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Man, some of you guys really have no clue. I'm no advocate of the NAACP but when it comes to the financial crisis, much of the cause stems from lenders' discrimination practices. That's why Clinton demanded reform for Fannie and Freddie. And when he proved just how profitable REGULATED lending to middle and low income minority families could be, that's when the private sector impeached him, changed the rules, deregulated the lending industry, and sunk their teeth into the windfall.How many of you guys have actually purchased a home??Do you guys know what earnest money is or what happens to it if you default on a closing??It's not so easy for some people just to walk away from the table after they've already put a deposit down on a contract, even if they misunderstood the terms or the terms were misrepresented to them.To answer your questions: -Yes I've owned my home for several years, I qualified for a substantial amount and bought a reasonable home that I can afford even if my salary decreased for whatever reason. I also put down a down payment of 35% of the value of the house.-Yes earnest money is catchy but there are ways around problems like the one the woman encountered here. It is easy for many people to walk away from the table after they've put a deposit down, in particular if the bank and terms are not what you agreed to previously. You're excusing what amounts to stupidity, you should never buy something that you can't afford, you should never sign a contract that you don't agree with and you should never go into a contract negotiation without knowing your rights. Companies across the board have been taking advantage of those who are either too lazy to read contracts or simply too stupid to know any better, surf any website with ads and you'll see dozens of examples of companies profiting off of people exactly like the woman in this article, the scale of money expended be different but they're very much the same. Do I feel sorry for people like this? A little because she will likely suffer credit issues for a long time, but nobody should excuse her for signing a contract she clearly didn't agree with from the moment she read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjc626 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Man, some of you guys really have no clue. I'm no advocate of the NAACP but when it comes to the financial crisis, much of the cause stems from lenders' discrimination practices. That's why Clinton demanded reform for Fannie and Freddie. And when he proved just how profitable REGULATED lending to middle and low income minority families could be, that's when the private sector impeached him, changed the rules, deregulated the lending industry, and sunk their teeth into the windfall.How many of you guys have actually purchased a home??Do you guys know what earnest money is or what happens to it if you default on a closing??It's not so easy for some people just to walk away from the table after they've already put a deposit down on a contract, even if they misunderstood the terms or the terms were misrepresented to them.I put down an earnest for my home to be built well before closing. I also understood that I would lose that earnest had I decided to back out of the deal before closing. Little sympathy for those throwing earnest money at something they cannot back out of in the event of an emergency. This just comes down to this "everyone has the right to own a home" sense of entitlement.But seriously, way to assume "some of us guys" really have no clue. Get over yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.