Jaymadd 2,309 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 FBO: NFC South questions and answersComment Email Print By Doug FarrarFootball OutsidersArchive With the 2008 season in the books, Football Outsiders is going division by division, applying its unique brand of analysis to one key question for each team. Today: the NFC South.Atlanta Falcons: Will the "Curse of 370" strike Michael Turner? One of the major keys to Atlanta's 2008 turnaround was former San Diego running back (and long-time LaDainian Tomlinson backup) Michael Turner, signed to a six-year, $34.5 million contract in March of last year. In his first year as a primary NFL back, Turner finished second in the league in yards (1,699, behind only Adrian Peterson) and touchdowns (18, behind only DeAngelo Williams). Turner did manage to lead the NFL in one important category -- unfortunately, that category was carries, with 376. Football Outsiders has established in numerous studies that running backs who are overworked (roughly 370 carries or more) are at greater risk for significant decline or injury the next season. The talented Turner now finds himself in the crosshairs of the Curse of 370. Jerious Norwood#32 RBAtlanta Falcons2008 STATSRush 95 Yds 489 TD 4 Rec 36 Yds 338 TD 2 The sad part is that Turner never had to be overworked, because the Falcons have another running back with a perfectly complementary skill set: three-year veteran Jerious Norwood. In 2007, Norwood put together a very impressive statistic -- while the offensive line in front of him finished dead last in Adjusted Line Yards, Norwood somehow finished first among all running backs in DVOA (our per-play value stat). And while Turner is a bruiser who likes to break through first contact and make his own lanes, Norwood is a speedster with a quick first cut that Turner just doesn't have. So, why did the Falcons give Norwood a total of 95 carries? In those carries, Norwood gained 5.1 yards per attempt and scored four touchdowns. The team seems to see Norwood as more of a multi-purpose player (he caught 36 passes and returned 51 kickoffs in 2008), but it would serve them well to split the load a bit more equitably especially since the rejuvenated offensive line can now help Norwood make plays. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jedi-Falcon 40 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Finally 2,903 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Some of that is caused by overworking off the field. I remember a report when LT was so hot and he worked out hard off the field. While his work ethic is commendable running is hard on your knees. Turner needs to stick with a normal exercise regime and a lot of low impact workouts. Also I am willing to bet that most of the 370 curse guys were in their first or second year in the nfl. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Zanzibar 16 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find.Whoa dude that sucks lol.But I'm not worrried about Turner too much. His body is built to take punishment, compared to a more lean back like LT. Also Turner learned from LT things to do to take care of your body, like getting weekly massages regardless of if you feel you need it or not.In my opinion Turner is having the equivalent of finishing his second year as a full time starter. If we take this year as a year and a half of him starting, punishment-wise, and add up the starts he had prior to it, I haven't done the math, but it shakes out okay for Mike.That said, we will be able to reduce his carries next year, with Norwood, and Ryan getting more snaps. Turner was VITAL to the development of Matt, he was his "training wheels" so to speak.By the end of the season we saw that Ryan was ready to pedal on his own, so we will be able to ease off of the burner to a safer amount of carries. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blaze01102 0 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bossFALCON™ 2,178 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find. i almost spat my soda out when i read that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Che 3 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find. That's cold Jedi but I see your point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
the evil emperor 32 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find.We spent 34 M on Turner. Thats not exactly cheap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aerosmith67 2,468 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Turner seemed fresh even in week 17 against the Rams, I think he'll break this so called "curse". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aerosmith67 2,468 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 We spent 34 M on Turner. Thats not exactly cheap.6 years, $34 million, around $15 million guaranteed.. we haven't "SPENT" $34 M on the guy.. merely around $15M over 6 years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Falcons Ace 279 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 We spent 34 M on Turner. Thats not exactly cheap.That's the maximum total value of his contract, not what we have payed him. He only got 15 or 16 guaranteed if I remember correctly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Warrior999 385 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I heard they front loaded his contract. Turner was one of the highest paid players this past season. If he does start to wear down lateon in the contract. The cap hit shouldn't be that bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bossFALCON™ 2,178 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I heard they front loaded his contract. Turner was one of the highest paid players this past season. If he does start to wear down lateon in the contract. The cap hit shouldn't be that bad.i think they did. i saw somewhere in the RC forum that he was the highest paid RB this year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Vent King 2,097 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 When noticing Turner's running style, true he has a lot of carries but to me he isn't one of those big impact run into you types. It seems a lot of the times he is getting dragged down by defenders he is dragging down the field more than getting "knocked" down. The way he runs low, guys seem to try and grab and wrap him up as opposed to say Jamal Anderson or a Adrian Peterson who try and run through people and end up with those car-crash type blows. It also seems like when guys try to wrap him up and there's a pile, he wiggles loose and gains 20 more yards. I think this makes his 370 carries different than most cause his not just bulldozing into people (accept for 3rd and shorts), more of a refuse to go down and drag your azz after the first tackle attempt by defenders. Anyway, even if he does go down I am more than confident in the abilities of Jason Snelling (assuming we still have him next year) to take up the slack. I really like that guy too and wish we could see more of him in the reg season to see if he's the real deal. I know tearing it up in pre-season and practice is different than reg season ball, but the guy seems legit to me. I think the staff will properly watch after Turner's carries as to not let him get worn out. We'll be okay... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falconidae 21,325 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 The problem with the 370 carries study is that its a statistical quirk- if they had set the limit at 365 or 375, the effect disappears. The guys that put the study together admitted they played around with numbers to get something to stand out. In other words its meaningless statistical games. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pzummo 6,724 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Anything "historical" isn't nearly as valid today as it was. Nutrition is better. Training is better. There are more resources available to the players to improve physically, and there's better medicine to help them recover better and faster. Historically, players were done after 30. Today, 35 year olds are signing multi-year deals. An injury that was historically career ending is season ending. An injury that was historically season ending is now a 4-6 week return.As long as Turner listens to his body, keeps himself healthy, and in shape, he shouldn't be any more susceptible to injury than he was any given Sunday this past season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconMama 3,514 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I hope he breaks the "curse" and I also hope that he won't carry the ball 376 times next season again. That kind of wear and tear isn't good especially when you have 2 very good backs on the roster behind him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BCEagleATLFalcon 11,361 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Whoa dude that sucks lol.But I'm not worrried about Turner too much. His body is built to take punishment, compared to a more lean back like LT. Also Turner learned from LT things to do to take care of your body, like getting weekly massages regardless of if you feel you need it or not.In my opinion Turner is having the equivalent of finishing his second year as a full time starter. If we take this year as a year and a half of him starting, punishment-wise, and add up the starts he had prior to it, I haven't done the math, but it shakes out okay for Mike.That said, we will be able to reduce his carries next year, with Norwood, and Ryan getting more snaps. Turner was VITAL to the development of Matt, he was his "training wheels" so to speak.By the end of the season we saw that Ryan was ready to pedal on his own, so we will be able to ease off of the burner to a safer amount of carries. Not sure why, but I found that really hilarious. Nice analogy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Karst41 5,761 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I say run him until he falls over dead, then just get a new RB. RBs are cheap and easy to find.JEDI !!! Man You are ROTTEN to the CORE !But back on point here.The 370 thing does not hold water and this is why.But first keep in mind that the heavy work load was tobenefit Ryan. Turner had 3 or 4 years in San Diego with very little usage.During this time his body was reaching a peak in physicalmaturity for a Pro Football Player.In short, This was a perfect scenario for an NFL Running Backbecause he was ready to Take It.This will not be the case in 2009 and I am projecting 300 touches Maxfor Turner or less.Now also keep in mind that Norwood has been with us a few seasonsunder the same situation as Turner in SD.Have you noticed that Norwoods body has Bulked up?The clear evidence of this was late last season after he had recovered fromsome nagging injuries Norwood used some brute force to bust free a few times.Set the Course of Action for 58.5 degrees of Runatude. In other words 58.5% of our plays in 09 will be running the ball.Clock Controll Quote Link to post Share on other sites
goldenfalcon 0 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I hope he breaks the "curse" and I also hope that he won't carry the ball 376 times next season again. That kind of wear and tear isn't good especially when you have 2 very good backs on the roster behind him.I think Matt begin to develops his stride as a passer....oh yeah that girl in ur sig looks like a dude IMO... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Karst41 5,761 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I think Matt begin to develops his stride as a passer....oh yeah that girl in ur sig looks like a dude IMO...Rhutt Rho.Hold on a minute! Lemme get my Pop Corn-----This is going to be good. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tipp78 51 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 With the way he is built and the size of those legs I think he'll be ok, but I would like to see Norwood get the rock more to keep Turner fresh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wahoofan45 19 Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 JEDI !!! Man You are ROTTEN to the CORE !But back on point here.The 370 thing does not hold water and this is why.But first keep in mind that the heavy work load was tobenefit Ryan. Turner had 3 or 4 years in San Diego with very little usage.During this time his body was reaching a peak in physicalmaturity for a Pro Football Player.In short, This was a perfect scenario for an NFL Running Backbecause he was ready to Take It.This will not be the case in 2009 and I am projecting 300 touches Maxfor Turner or less.Now also keep in mind that Norwood has been with us a few seasonsunder the same situation as Turner in SD.Have you noticed that Norwoods body has Bulked up?The clear evidence of this was late last season after he had recovered fromsome nagging injuries Norwood used some brute force to bust free a few times.Set the Course of Action for 58.5 degrees of Runatude. In other words 58.5% of our plays in 09 will be running the ball.Clock Controllyeah I noticed that too, he really seemed to fall forward when ever he got hit which is nothing like in madden also I would like to see more Snelling more too, especially in some screens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Karst41 5,761 Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 yeah I noticed that too, he really seemed to fall forward when ever he got hit which is nothing like in madden Waaay too much !also I would like to see more Snelling more too, especially in some screens. Oh yeah,, the thought of Snelling reaching the secondary is why we love us some feetyball. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cankles 0 Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 The problem with the 370 carries study is that its a statistical quirk- if they had set the limit at 365 or 375, the effect disappears. The guys that put the study together admitted they played around with numbers to get something to stand out. In other words its meaningless statistical games.It's bad methodology and FO certainly overstates their case, but there's still something to be said for not overworking a back. Personally, what bothers me isn't so much overusing Turner, it's underusing Norwood - he's a playmaker who deserves a lot more touches.xkcd sucks btw Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.