Deus Legend 10 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 This year the Jags D is a mess. Remember last year all the analysts thought the Jags had a top D. Apparently now it was Mike Smith behind their D and not Del Rio. Mike Smith brought his J-ville D with him and it has helped up a lot this year. Mike Smith was a great Head Coach choice. Go Falcons! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dirty Bird Ronnie 0 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 Good first post! welcome to the boards. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jedi-Falcon 40 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 Del Rio has lost that team. Coincidence?I'm beginning to think Mike Smith was the glue that held that team together all these years. Imagine those players looking at the Falcons and Mike Smith - Winning - and their own team (Losing). It has to be having an effect on them, and from what I've been reading Jack Del Rio has fallen apart trying to run that team this season, pissing off his players, losing their trust.Mike Smith is awesome. We are lucky to have him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jimusmc 5 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 MNF guys giving props to us now, smith was the guy making that team better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ki46dinah 1,950 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I'm not gonna say Smith was the all knowing glue of the Jags, but it is obvious that he was an asset that the Jaguars are sorely missing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
V-Town Falcon 380 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I think them not having Marcus Stroud has an effect on them as well as not having Coach Smith. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falconfoozball 21 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I think them not having Marcus Stroud has an effect on them as well as not having Coach Smith.Not to mention 4 starters on their OL. Maybe they're suffering from the shallow bench syndrome that Atlanta has had for years. I agree that something seems "off" w/Del Rio's gang this year, though. That performance tonight was more flat and uninspired than any I've ever seen from them. MJD seemed to be gutting it out, but the rest of the team missed the bus or something. And who is their #29 on Defense? I'm going to look that up tomorrow, because I'm pretty sure I don't want this guy to ever become a Falcon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ebonymonk 91 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I think them not having Marcus Stroud has an effect on them as well as not having Coach Smith.Also not having a passing game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
keller24VT 21 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 Del Rio has lost that team. Coincidence?I'm beginning to think Mike Smith was the glue that held that team together all these years. Imagine those players looking at the Falcons and Mike Smith - Winning - and their own team (Losing). It has to be having an effect on them, and from what I've been reading Jack Del Rio has fallen apart trying to run that team this season, pissing off his players, losing their trust.Mike Smith is awesome. We are lucky to have him.Isn't that ironic? A lot of people this offseason claimed that Coach Smith just stood there, while Del Rio ran the defense. Mmmmmm....does that mean you're claiming that the media was...wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hammerhead 187 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I live in jacksonville the fan base here wish they had mike smith back not as DC but as jacks replacement. All i can say is wow! Their message boards are giving us alot of glory for the way our team is playin under Smith.Go falcons---------------- Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kt-atl 0 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I bet on Jax a couple of times early in the season and realized they left their A game (and their B and C games) somewhere else. Started to figure out their difference between last year and this year was the lack of Mike Smith. Lots of injuries, of course, but good teams overcome that (look at the Falcons with all of our rookies). Really happy to see that other people are recognizing this too!!--Katie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
michaelgee 36 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 This year the Jags D is a mess. Remember last year all the analysts thought the Jags had a top D. Apparently now it was Mike Smith behind their D and not Del Rio. Mike Smith brought his J-ville D with him and it has helped up a lot this year. Mike Smith was a great Head Coach choice. Go Falcons! Smitty was the glue that held that team together, I love the guy! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
birdz4i 9,735 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I think them not having Marcus Stroud has an effect on them as well as not having Coach Smith.i agree. when the O doesn't have to designate 3 to 4 guys blocking him and henderson, they are free to block other players resulting in less pressure on the qb. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
War Damn Eagle 80 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 There's no question that they are missing Mike Smith. That being said, no team can overcome what they've dealt with on their offensive line and they were freakin' idiots to get rid of Stroud. Del Rio is skating on thin ice right now. He's been Petrino-ish with some of his tactics and the players aren't responding. I suspect next year will be his last because Garrard has fallen off dramatically trying to carry that team by himself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Falconsfan567 35,212 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 And all the media talking heads said that Mike Smith was a puppet and that Del Rio ran the defense. Losing 1 guy off defense doesn't make THAT big a difference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.