Jump to content

Jenkins is half the WR White is


justcs3
 Share

Recommended Posts

Really, this is not a bash thread. The stats do show that our 1 & 2 are playing like they are supposed to.

  1. RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD
  2. R. White 62 973 15.7 6
  3. M. Jenkins 33 498 15.1 3

Notice they are almost at a ratio of 2:1 White to Jenkins. And look at the average yards, about even.

  1. RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
  2. M. Turner 251 1088 4.3 13
  3. J. Norwood 73 394 5.4 2

Just added the running backs' stats for fodder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really, this is not a bash thread. The stats do show that our 1 & 2 are playing like they are supposed to.

  1. RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD
  2. R. White 62 973 15.7 6
  3. M. Jenkins 33 498 15.1 3

Notice they are almost at a ratio of 2:1 White to Jenkins. And look at the average yards, about even.

  1. RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
  2. M. Turner 251 1088 4.3 13
  3. J. Norwood 73 394 5.4 2

Just added the running backs' stats for fodder.

Jenkins is doing more with less. Now if they had the number of opportunities, but the same amount of yardage, TDs, etc., then one might say that he's half the WR that Roddy is....what a play on words..... :mellow: :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you could also make the case that if we didnt have roddy against CHI and PHI we wouldnt even have been in those games.

no roddy in philly and we're shut out.

no roddy in chicago and the final score is 20-15, bears.

no roddy in green bay and we lose 24-20 to the pack.

no roddy and we're 4-7, wondering who we're going to take w/ our top 10 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you could also make the case that if we didnt have roddy against CHI and PHI we wouldnt even have been in those games.

no roddy in philly and we're shut out.

no roddy in chicago and the final score is 20-15, bears.

no roddy in green bay and we lose 24-20 to the pack.

no roddy and we're 4-7, wondering who we're going to take w/ our top 10 pick.

Uhh.....i get youur point.....but....umm we can go on and say....No Michael Turner we lose to DET.....No michael Turner we lose to KC.....No Chris Houston and No Chevis Jackson....we lose to NO.....no Mike Jenkins we lose to CHI......No Harry Douglas we lose to Car......Roddy catches the ball last week we beat Denver....this can go on all day :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh.....i get youur point.....but....umm we can go on and say....No Michael Turner we lose to DET.....No michael Turner we lose to KC.....No Chris Houston and No Chevis Jackson....we lose to NO.....no Mike Jenkins we lose to CHI......No Harry Douglas we lose to Car......Roddy catches the ball last week we beat Denver....this can go on all day :)

And let's not forget, when I went back in time if I had stepped on that butterfly then we would all be speaking German and living on Mars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...