Jump to content

Just a kind reminder to any Falcons Staff that may see this post.


Recommended Posts

Geez people! A fade isn't "gimmicky" or "cute" play calling. A fade in the corner is a rather high percentage play. Anytime a play doens't work, we can always second guess the call. "What about that stupid call for Ryan to throw into triple coverage to White...Oh wait a minute, it worked for a touchdown. Nevermind!" :rolleyes:

Quit with the assinine coach bashing. If our players had executed it, no one would have a problem. I was a pi$$-poor throw by Ryan, that's all it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez people! A fade isn't "gimmicky" or "cute" play calling. A fade in the corner is a rather high percentage play. Anytime a play doens't work, we can always second guess the call. "What about that stupid call for Ryan to throw into triple coverage to White...Oh wait a minute, it worked for a touchdown. Nevermind!" :rolleyes:

Quit with the assinine coach bashing. If our players had executed it, no one would have a problem. I was a pi$$-poor throw by Ryan, that's all it was.

agreed. Just wasnt our day...Let's think about where we are, and the direction we are heading in. Yea Im p ssed too, but did anyone think we'd be 4-3 at this point. I am behind our players 100%. They showed no quit, and were in position to win the game minus a bad call by the ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez people! A fade isn't "gimmicky" or "cute" play calling. A fade in the corner is a rather high percentage play. Anytime a play doens't work, we can always second guess the call. "What about that stupid call for Ryan to throw into triple coverage to White...Oh wait a minute, it worked for a touchdown. Nevermind!" :rolleyes:

Quit with the assinine coach bashing. If our players had executed it, no one would have a problem. I was a pi$$-poor throw by Ryan, that's all it was.

Usually when a fade is used it is used with a tall receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually when a fade is used it is used with a tall receiver.

You do realize that Roddy is a tall receiver, right? Besides, exchange the receiver on that play with Jenkins or Finneran and it is still an INT because the throw was horrible. It was low and underthrown. Like I said, just a bad throw (a poorly executed play) that is all it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez people! A fade isn't "gimmicky" or "cute" play calling. A fade in the corner is a rather high percentage play. Anytime a play doens't work, we can always second guess the call. "What about that stupid call for Ryan to throw into triple coverage to White...Oh wait a minute, it worked for a touchdown. Nevermind!" :rolleyes:

Quit with the assinine coach bashing. If our players had executed it, no one would have a problem. I was a pi$$-poor throw by Ryan, that's all it was.

This isn't a case of hindsight being 20/20. That was a pisspoor call from the onset. The touchdown pass through double coverage was poor judgement gone right in our favor. Y. A. Tittle would crap his pants even thinking about that pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's pass from the 1 instead of running it with our highly paid fb and rb. It worked so well for Knapp when he was here. Let's just keep doing it. :rolleyes:

It was a case of trying to get cute when you are a run first team.

And sitting Ryan for those plays where Norwood took the snaps is a gimmick.

We tried to run it in and we got stuffed. How about let's not be predictable in any situation? That was what Knapp was, predictable. And I agree that the direct snap to Norwood is gimmick, but that isn't even relevant to this conversation. We're talking about the goalline play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a case of hindsight being 20/20. That was a pisspoor call from the onset. The touchdown pass through double coverage was poor judgement gone right in our favor. Y. A. Tittle would crap his pants even thinking about that pass.

While I agree with what you say about the TD call (I was being sarcastic) a fade is NOT a bad call. It was just poorly executed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried to run it in and we got stuffed. How about let's not be predictable in any situation? That was what Knapp was, predictable. And I agree that the direct snap to Norwood is gimmick, but that isn't even relevant to this conversation. We're talking about the goalline play.

Don't you remember the many times Knapp tried to pass from the goal line? :huh:

Knapp wasn't a good name to bring up in that situation because he did the exact same thing and it ended the exact same way. :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...