Jump to content

Eagles Coverage


byrd36

Recommended Posts

They have 6 interceptions to date. As of yet, Sheldon Brown has 0 where last year he let the team with 3. I know they'll most likely play strong cover 2 with blitzing packages as well as LBs patrolling the curl zone to get our slant routes interrupted. The slants have been our bread and butter this year. Let's say they do contain the run while blitzing with little time, what other type plays/routes do you think we will have to execute to get them to respect the pass and put more into coverage?

I personally think we'll see a few screens, both RB & WR screens in a spread 3-4 receiver set.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ryan is going to throw a couple picks on Sunday...

The bears could've/should've had two picks on Ryan but dropped them, one which could've been a pick6.

Everyone says he makes great decisions, and he does for the most part, but he has a tendency to go for it all and has been pretty lucky this year that he hasnt thrown his share of INTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ryan is going to throw a couple picks on Sunday...

The bears could've/should've had two picks on Ryan but dropped them, one which could've been a pick6.

Everyone says he makes great decisions, and he does for the most part, but he has a tendency to go for it all and has been pretty lucky this year that he hasnt thrown his share of INTs.

There's a HOF QB that use to play for Green Bay who got pretty lucky the same way. It worked out for him....even WITH the interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the key is establishing the run; exotic blitz or know exotic blitz.

Yes that is to key to all our games...but what I'm asking is if we don't get it going, like we failed to do against the bears for the most part, what adjustments/gameplan will we need to make against such a strong secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago game - 1 INT in the End Zone (Mikell) - Tipped pass INT (Howard) - End Zone INT was on a short field and the other on a tipped pass - plus Orton was the QB - 1 bad break - 1 tight coverage w/Orton passing - no surprises on these.

San Fran game - INT (Mikell) Short of intended reciver Bruce - INT (Parker) short pass in hurry-up - QB led the ball w/eyes defender jumped the ball and ran for the TD - O'Sullivan QB

Dallas game 1 INT (Samuel) short pass - pretty much in Samuels hands - QB Romo

Pitt game 1 INT (Samuel) - deep ball jump between receiver & defender - Samuel won the battle.

So pretty much the ints mainly came off of QB mistakes by leading with his eyes - throwing into too tight of coverage or short of the reciever - 4 INTs were in short passing situations - 1 INT was the result of Samuel getting the better jump on a reciver for the ball. If Ryan can avoid the mental areas of the game we should do just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that is to key to all our games...but what I'm asking is if we don't get it going, like we failed to do against the bears for the most part, what adjustments/gameplan will we need to make against such a strong secondary?

Screens and out routes. The Aints are pros at that. Norwood may become a bigger factor than we anticipate. Either way, we're going to have to may some adjustments, which I'm finally not worried about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago game - 1 INT in the End Zone (Mikell) - Tipped pass INT (Howard) - End Zone INT was on a short field and the other on a tipped pass - plus Orton was the QB - 1 bad break - 1 tight coverage w/Orton passing - no surprises on these.

San Fran game - INT (Mikell) Short of intended reciver Bruce - INT (Parker) short pass in hurry-up - QB led the ball w/eyes defender jumped the ball and ran for the TD - O'Sullivan QB

Dallas game 1 INT (Samuel) short pass - pretty much in Samuels hands - QB Romo

Pitt game 1 INT (Samuel) - deep ball jump between receiver & defender - Samuel won the battle.

So pretty much the ints mainly came off of QB mistakes by leading with his eyes - throwing into too tight of coverage or short of the reciever - 4 INTs were in short passing situations - 1 INT was the result of Samuel getting the better jump on a reciver for the ball. If Ryan can avoid the mental areas of the game we should do just fine.

Thanks, good info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to try and slow down the Eagles defense is to keep the score close enough that you dont have to abandon the run.

If the Eagles get out to a nice lead then they`ll blitz like crazy and the secondary is strong enough to go man to man with any team.

I agree. I think that even though the Eagles' corners are tough, we still have to make a gamble with throwing the ball downfield, especially if and when they come with the blitz. Our line's been good at picking up the blitz, and Ryan's been great at hitting his hot read or throwing the ball away. He gets the ball out of his hands quickly. I think Reid has to be careful not to corner blitz because Ryan WILL find the target. Should be interesting, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ryan is going to throw a couple picks on Sunday...

The bears could've/should've had two picks on Ryan but dropped them, one which could've been a pick6.

Everyone says he makes great decisions, and he does for the most part, but he has a tendency to go for it all and has been pretty lucky this year that he hasnt thrown his share of INTs.

T :lol::lol: L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel,Brown,Sheperd,Dawkins,Mikell is the strength of the Eagles D.

No doubt you have a pretty darn good secondary, but they do perform a lil under their par. They are good at just about everything but they have a weakness just like everyone does or they would be better then the titians. We have a good batch of recievers that can fly past you and stop on a dime. With Robinson back we have four very capable and reliable recievers and they can block... oh yes my favorite part about roddy is his blocking... top notch for a reciever. dotn forget about our "back up" :rolleyes: running back, mr. Norwood. he can line up too. oh and did i mention Peelle.... i know you eagle fans dont know who is is, but you will at some point on sunday :P it will be a hard fought game but i think we are up to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...