Theyhateme : ) Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I wonder why?Link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Same reason Denver got rid of him he is an old safety that was known for his hard hitting abilty, he is no longer a hard hitter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyhateme : ) Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 Same reason Denver got rid of him he is an old safety that was known for his hard hitting abilty, he is no longer a hard hitter.I haven't seen him play lately. I thought he had a little something left.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendyne Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Because his contract was based around him being on the active roster week 1.He should be back the game after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Affonso Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Can he still play? I don't think I saw him on the feild at all last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyhateme : ) Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 Can he still play? I don't think I saw him on the feild at all last season.I'm not really sure. It's just that hearing his name mentioned with being released, caught my attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1FalconsFan Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I wonder why?LinkI dont know it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 he is just a huge liability in coverage and not nearly the enforcer that he used to be.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozoatl Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I wonder why?LinkFrom what I saw:S-L-O-W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gooseguess Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Remeber when Duckett broke his tail bone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyhateme : ) Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 From what I saw:S-L-O-WI guess he really hasn't been the same since Duckett ran him over.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Long© Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I guess he really hasn't been the same since Duckett ran him over.... I was thinkin just that. Duckett folded him up backwards, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyhateme : ) Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 I was thinkin just that. Duckett folded him up backwards, lol....and I believe the very next play, Finn really cleaned his clock and finished him off.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironhead56 Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I wonder why?LinkHe wanted to play more. He has gone past his prime. The Broncos and the Pats saw him as situational, he did not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Long© Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 ...and I believe the very next play, Finn really cleaned his clock and finished him off.... I believe you are right, if not the next then not too many later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFanatic!!!! Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucman™® Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 No, He's ours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring It Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Age.It does funny things to the body. And some guys refuse to accept that.Remember Romanowski ???Same sad story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebonymonk Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Because his contract was based around him being on the active roster week 1.He should be back the game after.exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oregonsfan Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 JETS TO INTERCEPT LYNCH RETURN TO PATS?Posted by Mike Florio on September 1, 2008, 8:42 a.m. It’s widely believed that safety John Lynch, who was cut by the Patriots on Sunday, will re-sign with the team after Week One. The apparent goal by the Patriots is to avoid owing Lynch his full salary for 2008 if it’s determined early on that the relationship isn’t working out.Under the CBA, a player with four or more years of service make elect to take the balance of their salary as “termination pay” if they’re on the opening-day roster and thereafter cut.But the New York Jets might try to disrupt this plan. The Jets made a serious run at Lynch before he signed in New England, and if they were to match his deal in New England and put him on the Week One roster (thereby guaranteeing the whole thing), Lynch might be tempted.But the Jets don’t have a lot of cap room. And the Patriots aren’t stupid (except when they drafted Chad Jackson . . . and when they got caught last year videotaping defensive coaching signals at a time when they knew that teams were onto their tactics). They wouldn’t cut Lynch with an intention to re-sign him if they had any reason to believe he’d sign with the Jets.Besides, it sounds like Lynch already knows he’ll be back.“I have no regrets about my time thus far with the Patriots,” Lynch said on Sunday in a statement released by the team. “The immense respect that I’ve long held for the organization has been only heightened over the past couple of weeks. I am going to keep all options open and look forward with excitement to see what the future brings.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelgee Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 If you read the article it clearly said he has diminished speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ol'_dirty2 Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 It's because the level at which his play sucks is increasing incementally by the second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edZep Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 It's because the level at which his play sucks is increasing incementally by the second.What ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.