Lord Dark Helmet Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If any of you all have any sense, I suggest you start voting democrat. Or you need to pick up some 2000 degree sunblock.http://www.abcnews.go.com/International/St...7271&page=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATL Bear Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If any of you all have any sense, I suggest you start voting democrat. Or you need to pick up some 2000 degree sunblock.http://www.abcnews.go.com/International/St...7271&page=1Hyperbole much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Hyperbole much? That's the problem there. Condoleeza says they are just running their mouth as to folks like you. Stop in to say hello when it happens. Russia aint gonna play that US hypocritical " we can do what we want and tell others not to do the same" crap. Even Americans are sick of that. Lead by example or don't lead at all. What's gonna be your angle if Russia sets up a "defense" in Cuba? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDaveG Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Just read the entire article. All 3 pages.Missed the part about the nuclear strike.This isn't one of those things where you remove letters from words to get the answer you want, is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConservativeWarrior Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If we vote for a democrat , we will not only not build a misslie defense shield but we will get rid of all of our exsisting weapons, and Tech, and people like Russia and Iran will keep developing and building up theirs and then we will need a lot more help than 2000 sunblock I think, we will need a intervention from GOD himself. I dont know why they allowed this info to leak to the world media, Poland should have kept in quite and just let it happen, the issue hear is Russia is scared to death of the United States always has been, and now they see there formerly conquered Countries east of the Iron Curtain sideing with us and that angers them. Once again Russia strikes Poland, and we will wipe them off the face of the Earth, Mutal insured destruction and they dont want any of that over tiny little Poland......................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Just read the entire article. All 3 pages.Missed the part about the nuclear strike.This isn't one of those things where you remove letters from words to get the answer you want, is it? I did not read the one he posted but have seen in previous articles where Russia said it would go beyond diplomacy up to a nuclear strike.we will we will strike you. stomp stomp clap stomp stomp....BOOOOOOM!!!!!MOSCOW (Reuters) - A top Russian general on Friday said Poland's deal with the United States to set up parts of a missile defense shield on Polish territory lays it open to a possible military strike, a Russian news agency reported.Col-General Anatoliy Nogovitsyn, deputy chief of the general staff, told Interfax that Russian military doctrine would allow for a possible nuclear strike.Poland agreed on Thursday to host elements of a U.S. global anti-missile system after Washington agreed to boost Poland's own military air defenses."The USA is engaged in an anti-missile defense for its own government, and not for Poland. And Poland, in deploying (elements of the system) opens itself to a military strike. That is 100 percent," Interfax quoted Nogovitsyn as saying.Nogovitsyn said Russia allows nuclear weapons to be used in circumstances defined by its current security doctrine.The Russian government revamped its national security doctrine in 2000, broadening the range of conflicts in which nuclear weapons could be used."It is written clearly: We will use it in instances against governments that have nuclear weapons; against allies of countries with nuclear weapons, if they somehow enable them," he said.Washington says the missile system is aimed at protecting the United States and its allies from long-range missiles that could in the future be fired by Iran or groups such as al Qaeda.The Kremlin has long said that was untrue, and has opposed the shield as a threat to Russia. The 10 interceptor missiles to be based at a site in northern Poland compare with Russia's own nuclear arsenal of more than 5,000 ballistic warheads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pencilpusher. just because Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If we vote for a democrat , we will not only not build a misslie defense shield but we will get rid of all of our exsisting weapons, and Tech, and people like Russia and Iran will keep developing and building up theirs and then we will need a lot more help than 2000 sunblock I think, we will need a intervention from GOD himself. I dont know why they allowed this info to leak to the world media, Poland should have kept in quite and just let it happen, the issue hear is Russia is scared to death of the United States always has been, and now they see there formerly conquered Countries east of the Iron Curtain sideing with us and that angers them. Once again Russia strikes Poland, and we will wipe them off the face of the Earth, Mutal insured destruction and they dont want any of that over tiny little Poland.........................Nuke Russia over Poland? Yea, that is sound policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConservativeWarrior Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 The US has a deal with Poland that treats its territory as if it was a 51st state in the Union, We are pleaged to protect them if they are ever invaded again............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATL Bear Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 That's the problem there. Condoleeza says they are just running their mouth as to folks like you. Stop in to say hello when it happens. Russia aint gonna play that US hypocritical " we can do what we want and tell others not to do the same" crap. Even Americans are sick of that. Lead by example or don't lead at all. What's gonna be your angle if Russia sets up a "defense" in Cuba?Was that PIRATED VIDEO IS ILLEGAL of consciousness, or do you assemble incoherence like that normally? The poster said you better vote Democratic or the Russians are going to launch a nuclear attack. That would be called hyperbole. I know it's easier to comment on hyperbole when Obama is called a Marxist, muslim, terrorist, but it happens all the time here. At least be consistent. And you missed the part where Russia consistently chastised the US on Iraq while simultaneously beating the **** out of the Chechens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDaveG Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 I did not read the one he posted but have seen in previous articles where Russia said it would go beyond diplomacy up to a nuclear strike.we will we will strike you. stomp stomp clap stomp stomp....BOOOOOOM!!!!!MOSCOW (Reuters) - A top Russian general on Friday said Poland's deal with the United States to set up parts of a missile defense shield on Polish territory lays it open to a possible military strike, a Russian news agency reported.Col-General Anatoliy Nogovitsyn, deputy chief of the general staff, told Interfax that Russian military doctrine would allow for a possible nuclear strike.Poland agreed on Thursday to host elements of a U.S. global anti-missile system after Washington agreed to boost Poland's own military air defenses."The USA is engaged in an anti-missile defense for its own government, and not for Poland. And Poland, in deploying (elements of the system) opens itself to a military strike. That is 100 percent," Interfax quoted Nogovitsyn as saying.Nogovitsyn said Russia allows nuclear weapons to be used in circumstances defined by its current security doctrine.The Russian government revamped its national security doctrine in 2000, broadening the range of conflicts in which nuclear weapons could be used."It is written clearly: We will use it in instances against governments that have nuclear weapons; against allies of countries with nuclear weapons, if they somehow enable them," he said.Washington says the missile system is aimed at protecting the United States and its allies from long-range missiles that could in the future be fired by Iran or groups such as al Qaeda.The Kremlin has long said that was untrue, and has opposed the shield as a threat to Russia. The 10 interceptor missiles to be based at a site in northern Poland compare with Russia's own nuclear arsenal of more than 5,000 ballistic warheads.What that article says, in summary, is "we RESERVE THE RIGHT to use nukes against nuclear powers if THEY ENABLE THEIR NUKES."What Doofus McThreadstarter said was "Russia says Nuclear Strike WILL HAPPEN" if WE PUT A MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM (non-nuclear by definition) IN POLAND.See the difference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savwboy9 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Nice to see the Russians has all the libs cowering in corners again... My god the world is gonna die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 What that article says, in summary, is "we RESERVE THE RIGHT to use nukes against nuclear powers if THEY ENABLE THEIR NUKES."What Doofus McThreadstarter said was "Russia says Nuclear Strike WILL HAPPEN" if WE PUT A MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM (non-nuclear by definition) IN POLAND.See the difference?the Russians don't have to make threads.....our liberals can do it for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savwboy9 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 the Russians don't have to make threads.....our liberals can do it for themIf they can muster up the courage! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statick Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Russia wouldn't dare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savwboy9 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Russia wouldn't dare.I agree..They may very well be hard as nails , but stupid they are not.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AF89 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 That's the problem there. Condoleeza says they are just running their mouth as to folks like you. Stop in to say hello when it happens. Russia aint gonna play that US hypocritical " we can do what we want and tell others not to do the same" crap. Even Americans are sick of that. Lead by example or don't lead at all. What's gonna be your angle if Russia sets up a "defense" in Cuba?I know I sound conservative here but, wether we build Missles in Poland or not doesn't neccsarilly mean Russia won't build missles in Cuba Venezuela or anywhere else someday, if its now or within the next 50 years. It'll be nice to have all the leverage we can get if that day comes. Frankly on the insanity tier Russian leadership is just slighty more sane than North Korea, so I wouldn't put much past them, epecailly invading Poland or Urkraine.Now an eye for an eye makes the world blind but if you've got the abilty to poke the other guy's eye maybe he won't get you. Its a Cold Warish kinda tactic I know, but if we can get this done maybe Obama can improve our relations afterwards. :P .................................... or McCain, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greyhawk Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If we vote for a democrat , we will not only not build a misslie defense shield but we will get rid of all of our exsisting weapons,Testimony before CongressBefore you congratulate yourself on that technological masterpiece, you need to read this.For those who want the short version Phil Coyle, the Pentagon’s former top weapons tester says it’s all for nothing. “The system proposed for Poland and the Czech Republic doesn’t exist, has never been tested, and has no demonstrated effectiveness to defend Europe or the U.S. under realistic operational conditions,” Coyle contends in an exclusive conversation with DANGER ROOM. He says that even our existing missile defenses, installed in Alaska, couldn’t stop more than one or two rudimentary missiles from, say, Iran. “For these reasons the U.S. BMD system proposed for Europe is causing strife with Russia for nothing.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProtoType Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 People just don't care about innocent lives so they can just throw that nuke, killing millions of babies, children, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AF89 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Well the one good thing (The only good thing) about Nukes is that super powers haven't gone to war with each other in like 60 years becuase of them. Take those a way and we've long since been at war with Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdogg Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 I agree..They may very well be hard as nails , but stupid they are not..Exactly! Sounds like the Libs are fear mongering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Beast Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Poland is lousy worthless country, nobody would start a world war over Poland....... wait, Grandpa just told me that we actually did 70 years ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdogg Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Well the one good thing (The only good thing) about Nukes is that super powers haven't gone to war with each other in like 60 years becuase of them. Take those a way and we've long since been at war with Russia.Bingo. Nukes have been the ultimate war deterrent, for major powers. Had we not had nukes and shown the will to use them, the Cold War would have escalated into a real war. No doubt about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sofa_King_What? Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Was that PIRATED VIDEO IS ILLEGAL of consciousness, or do you assemble incoherence like that normally? The poster said you better vote Democratic or the Russians are going to launch a nuclear attack. That would be called hyperbole. I know it's easier to comment on hyperbole when Obama is called a Marxist, muslim, terrorist, but it happens all the time here. At least be consistent. And you missed the part where Russia consistently chastised the US on Iraq while simultaneously beating the **** out of the Chechens.That may well be, but the point is that America is engaging in that sort of behavior. If other countries want to behave that way, it will only reflect on them even more poorly if our actions are a clear and shining contrast. Otherwise, we are the ones who appear to the rest of the world to be bullies. Our immense power places on us an even heaver burden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AF89 Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Unfourtunattly the human race as a whole is still a warlike species. Its better than it used to be and it gets better with every passing century but we're not to the point where we can just lay down are arms and expect every one else to do the same. There are just to many diferences. One day in the future we 'll learn to repect those diferences but probally not in our lifetime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLDenali Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 If any of you all have any sense, I suggest you start voting democrat. Or you need to pick up some 2000 degree sunblock.http://www.abcnews.go.com/International/St...7271&page=1leave the fear-mongering to the republicans, please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.