Jump to content

Since the topic has been brought up...CNN reporter on McCain vs. Bush


jidady
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/18/caf...cain/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/18/caf...cain/index.html

By Jack Cafferty

CNN

Decrease font Decrease font

Enlarge font Enlarge font

Editor's Note: Jack Cafferty is the author of the best-seller "It's Getting Ugly Out There: The Frauds, Bunglers, Liars, and Losers Who Are Hurting America." He provides commentary on CNN's "The Situation Room" daily from 4 p.m.-7 p.m. You can also visit Jack's Cafferty File blog.

Jack Cafferty says John McCain shows virtually no intellectual curiosity, emulating President Bush

Jack Cafferty says John McCain shows virtually no intellectual curiosity, emulating President Bush

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Russia invades Georgia and President Bush goes on vacation. Our president has spent one-third of his entire two terms in office either at Camp David, Maryland, or at Crawford, Texas, on vacation.

His time away from the Oval Office included the month leading up to 9/11, when there were signs Osama bin Laden was planning to attack America, and the time Hurricane Katrina destroyed the city of New Orleans.

Sen. John McCain takes weekends off and limits his campaign events to one a day. He made an exception for the religious forum on Saturday at Saddleback Church in Southern California.

I think he made a big mistake. When he was invited last spring to attend a discussion of the role of faith in his life with Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, McCain didn't bother to show up. Now I know why.

It occurs to me that John McCain is as intellectually shallow as our current president. When asked what his Christian faith means to him, his answer was a one-liner. "It means I'm saved and forgiven." Great scholars have wrestled with the meaning of faith for centuries. McCain then retold a story we've all heard a hundred times about a guard in Vietnam drawing a cross in the sand.

Asked about his greatest moral failure, he cited his first marriage, which ended in divorce. While saying it was his greatest moral failing, he offered nothing in the way of explanation. Why not?

Don't Miss

* The Cafferty File: Join the conversation

* Jack's book: "It's Getting Ugly Out There"

* Analysis: Is McCain finding his way on faith?

Throughout the evening, McCain chose to recite portions of his stump speech as answers to the questions he was being asked. Why? He has lived 71 years. Surely he has some thoughts on what it all means that go beyond canned answers culled from the same speech he delivers every day.

He was asked "if evil exists." His response was to repeat for the umpteenth time that Osama bin Laden is a bad man and he will pursue him to "the gates of ****." That was it.

He was asked to define rich. After trying to dodge the question -- his wife is worth a reported $100 million -- he finally said he thought an income of $5 million was rich.

One after another, McCain's answers were shallow, simplistic, and trite. He showed the same intellectual curiosity that George Bush has -- virtually none.

Where are John McCain's writings exploring the vexing moral issues of our time? Where are his position papers setting forth his careful consideration of foreign policy, the welfare state, education, America's moral responsibility in the world, etc., etc., etc.?

John McCain graduated 894th in a class of 899 at the Naval Academy at Annapolis. His father and grandfather were four star admirals in the Navy. Some have suggested that might have played a role in McCain being admitted. His academic record was awful. And it shows over and over again whenever McCain is called upon to think on his feet.

He no longer allows reporters unfettered access to him aboard the "Straight Talk Express" for a reason. He simply makes too many mistakes. Unless he's reciting talking points or reading from notes or a TelePrompTer, John McCain is lost. He can drop bon mots at a bowling alley or diner -- short glib responses that get a chuckle, but beyond that McCain gets in over his head very quickly.

I am sick and tired of the president of the United States embarrassing me. The world we live in is too complex to entrust it to someone else whose idea of intellectual curiosity and grasp of foreign policy issues is to tell us he can look into Vladimir Putin's eyes and see into his soul.

George Bush's record as a student, military man, businessman and leader of the free world is one of constant failure. And the part that troubles me most is he seems content with himself.

He will leave office with the country $10 trillion in debt, fighting two wars, our international reputation in shambles, our government cloaked in secrecy and suspicion that his entire presidency has been a litany of broken laws and promises, our citizens' faith in our own country ripped to shreds. Yet Bush goes bumbling along, grinning and spewing moronic one-liners, as though nobody understands what a colossal failure he has been.

I fear to the depth of my being that John McCain is just like him.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sick and tired of the president of the United States embarrassing me. The world we live in is too complex to entrust it to someone else whose idea of intellectual curiosity and grasp of foreign policy issues is to tell us he can look into Vladimir Putin's eyes and see into his soul.

Amen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the lively art of debate...

Perhaps I thought I was in for an analysis between the policy positions of Bush and McCain. Instead I read a piece of tripe questioning the intelligence of McCain and assailing his academic record as a graduate of the Naval Academy no less from a writer who didn't even go to college. What's next, an essay contest?

We have plenty of opinion in today's news environment, Cafferty exemplifies the inciteful kind, not the insightful.

I must be a glutton for punishment since now it's another minute wasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead I read a piece of tripe questioning the intelligence of McCain and assailing his academic record as a graduate of the Naval Academy no less from a writer who didn't even go to college.

What you read was a column questioning the leadership ability of people who make glib 10-word replies. Whether the irony of your reply was lost on you or not, that's exactly the post you made in reply to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's there to debate? A political world wherein vapid two sentence answers have become acceptable explanations for entire subjects. His answer on religion is intellectually empty. And the criticisms of the column have been just as devoid of critical thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I thought I was in for an analysis between the policy positions of Bush and McCain. Instead I read a piece of tripe questioning the intelligence of McCain and assailing his academic record as a graduate of the Naval Academy no less from a writer who didn't even go to college. What's next, an essay contest?

We have plenty of opinion in today's news environment, Cafferty exemplifies the inciteful kind, not the insightful.

I must be a glutton for punishment since now it's another minute wasted.

:lol:

I always love to read your responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's there to debate? A political world wherein vapid two sentence answers have become acceptable explanations for entire subjects. His answer on religion is intellectually empty. And the criticisms of the column have been just as devoid of critical thinking.
Those two sentence answers have been performed by both sides. McCain is no more guilty of this than Obama, yet there is no mention of the other side. If you are going to call this guy a reporter, perhaps you should note that he totally failed to bring both sides of the issue to the forum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's there to debate? A political world wherein vapid two sentence answers have become acceptable explanations for entire subjects. His answer on religion is intellectually empty. And the criticisms of the column have been just as devoid of critical thinking.

What is there to think critically about. The column doesn't justify a response, much less finding something to discuss. It's essentially just name calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you read was a column questioning the leadership ability of people who make glib 10-word replies. Whether the irony of your reply was lost on you or not, that's exactly the post you made in reply to it.

Yes, because we all know that effective leadership requires verbosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because we all know that effective leadership requires verbosity.

I'll grant, though, that during one of the primary debates, his glib one liners were really getting on my nerves, and why I'm probably going to be voting for Barr in November. He was truly being a smart ***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The column doesn't justify a response, much less finding something to discuss.

Clearly, I disagree. I also ask you whether you embarrassed by political discourse predicated upon soundbites. This issue is only as partisan as you make it out to be.

EDIT: I didn't see your other reply before making mine. Clearly, we feel the same about the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many people confuse long, flowery speech with intelligence. The opposite is true. The ability to deliver a your point with short, concise comments is much more difficult than a long, rambling statement (which is essentially thinking out loud, which is what Obama does.)

There was a marvelous episode of The West Wing that addressed this issue. The crux of it is that 10 word answers have become shamefully simplistic and pandering. You say that being concise is harder. To the contrary, I find it to be the coward's move more often than not. If you say little, you leave yourself open to interpretation while maintaining plausible deniability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly, I disagree. I also ask you whether you embarrassed by political discourse predicated upon soundbites. This issue is only as partisan as you make it out to be.

EDIT: I didn't see your other reply before making mine. Clearly, we feel the same about the issue.

Sort of. I certainly don't think that you get a lesser evil with Obama. Obama talks more, but his speeches are as empty as McCain's one-liners, and once he gets away from a script, he's as bumbling a public speaker as our current commander and chief. I can't remember the last time that two bona fide candidates ran against each other, and the best man won because he was the best man. It's been decades, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a marvelous episode of The West Wing that addressed this issue. The crux of it is that 10 word answers have become shamefully simplistic and pandering. You say that being concise is harder. To the contrary, I find it to be the coward's move more often than not. If you say little, you leave yourself open to interpretation while maintaining plausible deniability.

HA. Can I agree and disagree?

Being concise does not mean not addressing the issue. It means being direct and not trying to dress up the issue with fluff. You can say a lot of words and come away with the same content as a glib "10 word answer."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...