Jump to content

US Going To Participate in Talks With Iran


Hazy Dayz
 Share

Recommended Posts

as well as from some of the folks on this board. But I guess it's ok since the Republican administration is going to do it. If it was the Dems then that would have been different right?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/18/...s.ap/index.html

Iran sees 'positive' nuclear talks with U.S

  • ANKARA, Turkey (AP) -- Iran's Foreign Minister said Friday that forthcoming nuclear talks in Geneva and the participation of a U.S. diplomat for the first time look positive and he expects progress.
art.burns.afp.gi.jpg

Undersecretary of State William Burns will head to Switzerland for talks on Saturday.

corner_wire_BL.gifU.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns was expected to attend the talks in Geneva on Saturday -- the first time the U.S. has had such a presence -- and join colleagues from other world powers to meet with Iran's chief nuclear negotiator.

"The new negotiation process (and) the participation of a U.S. diplomat look positive from the outset, but we hope that is reflected in the talks," Mottaki told a joint news conference with Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan.

He said the presence of U.S. representative "is a new positive approach."

Meanwhile, Burns met Friday for about 20 minutes with International Atomic Energy Agency head Mohamed Elbaradei to discuss Iran's contentious atompic program. He did not speak to reporters before leaving.

The U.S. has shifted from its confrontational policy of isolating Iran in favor of a diplomatic approach.

The U.S. administration is also floating a proposal to open a de facto U.S. Embassy in Tehran. U.S. diplomats would go to Iran for the first time in almost 30 years, since the countries broke relations after the 1979 Islamic revolution

"I think there might be an agreement both on the issue of opening a U.S. interest protection bureau in Iran and on the issue of direct flights to Iran," Mottaki said.

The six-nation group -- the group of five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia, the U.S. and Germany -- has offered Iran incentives to halt activities that could lead to development of nuclear weapons.

U.S. officials say Burns will be listening, not negotiating, at the meeting that they insist is a "one-time event." But his mere presence signals a significant change in Bush's approach toward Iran, a charter member of what he termed the "axis of evil" in 2002.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday that "the United States is firmly behind this diplomacy, firmly behind and unified with our allies and hopefully the Iranians will take that message."

Washington insists it will not negotiate with Iran as it has with North Korea until Tehran halts enriching and reprocessing uranium. But it is supporting an effort led by European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana that would allow early talks with others in the six-nation group before such a step.

Iran has rebuffed the attempt to persuade it to stop enrichment and reprocessing, which can produce the key ingredient for atomic weapons, and insists its nuclear program is designed only to produce electric power. Others, particularly the United States and Israel, maintain it is a cover for weapons development.

As part of its diplomatic efforts, the U.S. administration is also floating a proposal to open a de-facto U.S. Embassy in Tehran. U.S. diplomats would go to Iran for the first time in almost 30 years, since the countries broke relations after the 1979 Islamic revoluqtion.

Mottaki, however, insisted on specifically calling a U.S. mission "a U.S. interest-protection bureau," instead of a diplomatic mission.

Turkey, a close U.S. ally, supports Iran's right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful use but calls on Tehran to be transparent about its controversial nuclear program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the GOP was stating that they would not engage in unilateral talks with Iran without preconditions, whereas the Dem's were stating that no preconditions would be needed for those types of talks. 

Either way, multi-lateral talks are going to help more in the long run anyway, so this is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ucsbdirtybird (7/18/2008)
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the GOP was stating that they would not engage in unilateral talks with Iran without preconditions, whereas the Dem's were stating that no preconditions would be needed for those types of talks. 

Either way, multi-lateral talks are going to help more in the long run anyway, so this is a good thing.

The US originally refused bilateral talks with Iran without preconditions.  Of course, these talks will be multilateral talks about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kicker23 (7/18/2008)
ucsbdirtybird (7/18/2008)
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the GOP was stating that they would not engage in unilateral talks with Iran without preconditions, whereas the Dem's were stating that no preconditions would be needed for those types of talks. 

Either way, multi-lateral talks are going to help more in the long run anyway, so this is a good thing.

The US originally refused bilateral talks with Iran without preconditions.  Of course, these talks will be multilateral talks about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. 

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080718/ap_on_...a_st_pe/us_iran

Seems like preconditions are still a part of the plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...