doubletrouble21 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I'd say Long.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFan13 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I say Ellis. Only because i like the OT's from the 2nd to 4th round a heck of a lot more than the DT's OT talent doesn't drop that much. DT talent sucks horrible after the top 3 or 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magstuff Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I would be happy with either one of these guys.I would like Long and then a QB in the 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackwhitered Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I say Dorsey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubletrouble21 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 FalconFan13 (2/25/2008)I say Ellis. Only because i like the OT's from the 2nd to 4th round a heck of a lot more than the DT's OT talent doesn't drop that much. DT talent sucks horrible after the top 3 or 4.You make a good point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSlick Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I say Jake Long. It seems premier LT's are harder to come by then great DT's. JMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott24falcs Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 grendel (2/25/2008)I said Long, but I meant Chris LongCo-signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 grendel (2/25/2008)BigSlick (2/25/2008)I say Jake Long. It seems premier LT's are harder to come by then great DT's. JMO.Yes, and I'd agree with you if Jake Long was going to be a premiere LT. He's no Joe Thomas.People we're saying the same thing about Joe Thomas last year at this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LADBABY Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Either Long is preferable to Ellis. Ellis is on the shortside and is 5.2 forty man. If he runs anything under5.0 then I might change my tune. We only get 1pick when these guys are available. I am not sayingEllis is not going to be good. Forty times for hisposition don't do anything but indicate whether hecan run somebody down. We want big, strong andfast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.