Jump to content

"Whispers" on NY Giants and D. Hall


xcomm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here is one whisper from around the league:

"Don t rule out the Giants in the DeAngelo Hall trade derby. Although a deal isn t likely to happen, the Giants would be interested in the services of Hall, whose man-coverage skills would be a good fit for the team s scheme. A source with knowledge of the Giants line of thinking said the team feels that his off-field issues would not be a problem because of the team s strong leadership. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A deal is less likely to happen because Hall burned every bridge back to Atlanta. I bet they are shooting for a 2nd rounder now. I should of known he would mess all of this up.

But I still have higher hopes for other teams! However seeing "Hall" and "man coverage" in the same sentence made me laugh. Escpecially without seeing "soft" or "non existent" in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

xcomm (2/23/2008)
Here is one whisper from around the league:

"Don t rule out the Giants in the DeAngelo Hall trade derby. Although a deal isn t likely to happen, the Giants would be interested in the services of Hall, whose man-coverage skills would be a good fit for the team s scheme. A source with knowledge of the Giants line of thinking said the team feels that his off-field issues would not be a problem because of the team s strong leadership. "

What are the off-field issues are they are talking about?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what's all the talk about the Giants not needing good CBs. Yeah they won the Superbowl without a top tier CB, but at least they are smart enough to understand that players of Hall's caliber are hard to come by, so why not trade for him. Smart organizations know that in order to build a good team, they need good players. Instead of getting rid of all their stars, they build around their stars. But hey, we're the Falcons. We don't know much about winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

grendel (2/24/2008)
somecut8 (2/24/2008)
so what's all the talk about the Giants not needing good CBs. Yeah they won the Superbowl without a top tier CB, but at least they are smart enough to understand that players of Hall's caliber are hard to come by, so why not trade for him. Smart organizations know that in order to build a good team, they need good players. Instead of getting rid of all their stars, they build around their stars. But hey, we're the Falcons. We don't know much about winning.

Great CB's are the icing on the cake once you have a good team.

We don't have the cake yet.

I have asked this before and will ask this again, "how many Super Bowls has Champ Bailey won the Broncos or Redskins?"

winning will take more than one superstar CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...