birdweiserrr Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 30th in 2007 60%32nd in 2006 54%38th in 2005 55%15th in 2004 65%TE's with 25 or more catches.I made this argument the past 2 years to those that said Crumpler had no problems catching Vick's passes. The point I was making was just that, that Crumpler did have a problem catching Vick's passes. As we can see he did improve in 2007 but what I find more interesting is the drop off from 2004. Of course the QB's passes play a large part of the passes being caught, but I thought you'd find this interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdweiserrr Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Why not let me toot my own horn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDash Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 I hope, he goes to the Eagles to help McRib!Petrino lost on purpose to get Brohm, so I wouldnt base anything on last season, but the guy who was first option for many years wasnt even looked at last year with Checkdown at Qb!Was his blocking really up to the level it should have been?Not saying either way just wondering Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdweiserrr Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 iDash (2/16/2008)I hope, he goes to the Eagles to help McRib!Petrino lost on purpose to get Brohm, so I wouldnt base anything on last season, but the guy who was first option for many years wasnt even looked at last year with Checkdown at Qb!Was his blocking really up to the level it should have been?Not saying either way just wonderingThen forget about last year.32nd in 2006 54%38th in 2005 55% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacfan Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 birdweiserrr (2/16/2008)30th in 2007 60%32nd in 2006 54%38th in 2005 55%15th in 2004 65%TE's with 25 or more catches.I made this argument the past 2 years to those that said Crumpler had no problems catching Vick's passes. The point I was making was just that, that Crumpler did have a problem catching Vick's passes. As we can see he did improve in 2007 but what I find more interesting is the drop off from 2004. Of course the QB's passes play a large part of the passes being caught, but I thought you'd find this interesting.1. completely different offenses, according to espn crump was only caught 2 passes further than 10 yards downfield last year2007as opposed to 30% of his catches being passes over 10 yards in 20062006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 birdweiserrr (2/16/2008)Why not let me toot my own horn?NOBODY'S BEEN ABLE TO STOP YOU SO FAR ......... TOOT TILL YOUR HEART IS CONTENT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdweiserrr Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Bump!We can and will do better than Crumpler (once my favorite player). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazoo Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 sacfan 1. completely different offenses, according to espn crump was only caught 2 passes further than 10 yards downfield last year2007as opposed to 30% of his catches being passes over 10 yards in 20062006You comletely shattered the biased, dishonest argument that was originally set forth, and if the truth remotely mattered to him, he would agree. However, we all know his agenda is top priority and therfore he would never concede wholesale owership of yet another baseless, unsupportable assertion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdweiserrr Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 gazoo (2/17/2008)sacfan 1. completely different offenses, according to espn crump was only caught 2 passes further than 10 yards downfield last year2007as opposed to 30% of his catches being passes over 10 yards in 20062006You comletely shattered the biased, dishonest argument that was originally set forth, and if the truth remotely mattered to him, he would agree. However, we all know his agenda is top priority and therfore he would never concede wholesale owership of yet another baseless, unsupportable assertion. Shattered my argument? I didn't talk about the yardage. You been hangin out in Honduras again? That must be some good stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.