myates111 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 There are alot of NFL teams declaring who will be their franchise player, who do you think the falcons should place a franchise tag on and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbird Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 None Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vagus_x Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I dont think we have a free agent worth tagging Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrickles@hotmail.com Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Absolutely, positively, no one on this team should be "tagged" as a franchise player other than Michael Boley if a new contract cannot be worked out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon Fanatic Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 myates111 (2/7/2008)There are alot of NFL teams declaring who will be their franchise player, who do you think the falcons should place a franchise tag on and why?Boley would be the only one that comes to mind to keep someone from coughing up a 1st and a 3rd to steal him away from us him being a RFA but I read where the Falcons are close to resigning him so that is great news. Other than that we don't have anyone worthy of that tag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 THERE IS NOBODY TO TAG! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of God Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 rydolph (2/7/2008)myates111 (2/7/2008)There are alot of NFL teams declaring who will be their franchise player, who do you think the falcons should place a franchise tag on and why?Boley would be the only one that comes to mind to keep someone from coughing up a 1st and a 3rd to steal him away from us him being a RFA but I read where the Falcons are close to resigning him so that is great news. Other than that we don't have anyone worthy of that tag.I love your FA list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossFALCON™ Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 (2/7/2008)Absolutely, positively, no one on this team should be "tagged" as a franchise player other than Michael Boley if a new contract cannot be worked out.yea i was going to say boley too. i cant think of anyone else worth franchising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juraitwaluzka Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Even though he's no longer on the team I think we should still go ahead and place the franchise tag on Boone Stutz anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formul8or Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Koenan! I think his contract is up, but I'm not sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtlFan80 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 We should tag no one except Boley if we cant get a contract done. D. Hall next year if he is not signed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.