Jump to content

Senator Wants N.F.L. Spying Case Explained

Recommended Posts


The ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee wants N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell to explain why the league destroyed evidence related to spying by the New England Patriots.

In the stretch of 12 days, from Sept. 9 to Sept. 20, the Patriots were caught filming the Jets defensive signals in violation of N.F.L. rules, ordered to hand over all tapes of illegal filming to the league office, fined $750,000 and made to forfeit a first-round draft pick.

Then the N.F.L. announced it had destroyed the evidence.

In a telephone interview Thursday morning, Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania and ranking member of the committee, said that Goodell would eventually be called before the committee to address two issues: the league s antitrust exemption in relation to its television contract and the destruction of the tapes that revealed spying by the Patriots.

That requires an explanation, Specter said. The N.F.L. has a very preferred status in our country with their antitrust exemption. The American people are entitled to be sure about the integrity of the game. It s analogous to the C.I.A. destruction of tapes. Or any time you have records destroyed.

Mr. Specter first wrote Mr. Goodell about the tapes on Nov. 15. After more than a month passed without a response, Mr. Specter wrote to him again.

The league responded to Mr. Specter late Thursday afternoon. A spokesman said the letters did not reach the league office until late last week. The league added that it spoke to Mr. Specter s office several times during November and December, but that the letters were never mentioned. Mr. Specter said the league had told his office last week it would not respond until after the Super Bowl.

Joe Browne, the N.F.L. s executive vice president for internal affairs, said, The irony is that we have been in contact with the senator s office several times in recent weeks. He added that the issue of these letters was not discussed.

Mr. Specter called Mr. Browne s response untrue.

It s the same old story, Mr. Specter said. What you did is never as important as the cover-up. This sequence raises more concerns and doubts.

When Mr. Specter was asked if he could envision a situation in which employees of the Patriots or the N.F.L. were called to testify before the committee, he said he wanted to take the investigation one step at a time.

It could, Mr. Specter said. It s premature to say whom we re going to call or when. It starts with the commissioner. He had the tapes, and he made the decision as to what the punishment could be. He made the decision to destroy them.

Mr. Specter said it had not been determined when Mr. Goodell would be called before the committee.

Matt Walsh, a Patriots employee from 1996 through 2003 who spent much of that time in the video department, said he would like to see the issue resolved.

Was it a surprise that they were doing it or a surprise that they got caught? Mr. Walsh said of the videotaping incident. I guess that if you re doing something that people suspect you of, and then you start doing it to your former assistant coaches, then you re pushing your luck.

Mr. Walsh declined to say whether he would be willing to testify before a Congressional committee. He also said he had not been contacted by the N.F.L. about the Patriots or about videotaping.

I d like to see a resolution to the situation, so I don t have to have field media calls, especially after being out of the league for more than four years, he said.

Mr. Walsh, an assistant golf pro at the Ka anapali Golf Resort in Lahaina, Hawaii, declined to get into specifics of what he did while with the Patriots video department, citing confidentiality agreements he signed with the team. Greg Aiello, an N.F.L. spokesman, said the league did not have confidentiality agreements, but teams were free to make their own with their employees.

After speaking to my lawyers and whatnot, I can t really talk to you about anything, Mr. Walsh said. And I can t show you anything. Mr. Walsh said he had been approached by two news organizations, a sports network and another media outlet that doesn t even specialize in sports. He said he would talk about his experiences only on his terms.

If someone wanted me to talk and tell them things, I would craft an agreement where they would agree from now until the end of my existence to pay for any legal fees that came up in regards to this, whether I m sued by the Patriots, the N.F.L., anybody else, he said. He also said he would want an indemnification agreement, with the news media company paying any fines or damages found against him in court. (It is against the policy of The New York Times to be part of such an agreement.) Mr. Walsh said he sought the legal advice after receiving telephone calls from the news media soon after the taping incident. He said he did so to protect himself and his family.

If I ever got brought in for a deposition or something, then I would just face the whole gauntlet of questions, he said. There would be things I d be forced to answer that some people haven t taken responsibility for.

The Patriots videotaping practices came into question during the opening game of their undefeated regular season. Jets security personnel caught a Patriots employee filming the Jets defensive signals from the sideline at Giants Stadium on Sept. 9.

Mr. Goodell, whose father, Charles, was a congressman and later a senator from New York, went on national television and promised a full investigation. He ordered the Patriots to send in any videotape filmed in violation of N.F.L. rules, from any game in any season, to the league office.

After reviewing the tapes, the N.F.L. announced it had destroyed them, saying it did so to prevent them from being used to gain a competitive advantage.

Mr. Goodell levied the most severe penalty in history on the Patriots the loss of a first-round draft pick, a $500,000 fine for Coach Bill Belichick and a $250,000 fine for the team. The league said the penalty was for the Patriots totality of conduct and not simply for the Jets game.

Mr. Goodell is to hold a news conference in Phoenix on Friday morning. When asked if the commissioner would address the destroyed evidence, what was on the tapes and why that information never was made public, Mr. Aiello, the league spokesman, said, He will address whatever questions are asked.

The N.F.L. has addressed Mr. Specter s concerns about its antitrust exemption before.

Over the years, we ve testified before Senator Specter and the Judiciary Committee regarding our limited antitrust exemption, Mr. Browne said. Usually, it s about television signals, not on-the-field defensive signals.

While responding to the antitrust exemption, the N.F.L. again declined to discuss the destruction of the tapes or discuss what they showed. Albert Tortorella, the managing director of crisis management for the Los Angeles-based Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, said he found that puzzling.

Anytime Congress is involved with one of my clients, I tell them to respond, Mr. Tortorella said. You may not want to give Congress anything. But ignoring them is not a good idea.

Mr. Specter, a lifelong Eagles fan who still calls Philadelphia sports radio stations most Monday mornings, said he was concerned about the integrity of sports as much as any fan.

I don t think you have to have a law broken to have a legitimate interest by the Congress on the integrity of the game. He added: What if there was something on the tapes we might want to be subpoenaed, for example? You can t destroy it. That would be obstruction of justice.

It s premature to make any suggestions until you know a lot more about the matter. We need to know what s on those tapes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Botton Line:

Timely Political Move? Possibly. The Senator should've stopped the Patriots and The NFL half-way through this season. It's far too late now.

The eveidence was so bad that THe NFL did not allow other owners to see it. They torched it, and told the other teams that they don't have anymore..(I highly doubt that..It' my opinion)

The Patriots are great, but they possibly had accesss to personal groupings, wire-taps, jammings, huddles with photos, hand-singals, etc.. Regime changes bring new signals and players, but it took an "insider" NYJets Head Coach, Mangini, who knew for seasons what they were doing, to confront their cameraman.

THe Patriots camera-man was on the opposing teams sideline or in a seat over their bench for nearly every game.. Even the ones on the road?!!

I guess the other teams assumed that the camera man worked for NFL Films except for The NYJets.

One of their defensive players was suspended for HGH...Fact.

My opinion: The Patriots have to win two more Superbowls in a 5-year period. As the years go, and they lose more.. The question is going to arise of why they can't keep it going as long as Brady is there and healthy..Ben Watson, Maroney, the O-Line, etc..

The NFL should've leveded more of a harsh fine for them because another franchise will find a better way to cheat, and things could get out fo hand. All teams probably cheat , but this was High Tech Espionage. It took a great QB to pull-it together, but Spygate is always going to be there.

ESPN, Fox, NFL Network, HBO can ignore it for years, and to no avail. That's why two more Superbowls will have to suffice to end it all. Plus, a media group with no connections to The NFL or The Superbowl will have an investigative report in a few years. None of these networks will do anything. The talks of the boot seemed to be used in place of any question, or in-depth analysis of the spying.

Link to post
Share on other sites
brittle pete (2/1/2008)
Somebody needs to look a lil deper into this. imo the pats are cheater and have been for a long time. maybe every team cheats,but they got caught. plus, does the cameraman still work for the team

It's over..

Big warning to other teams instead of more serious investigation and punishment of the culprits:

Remember the comissioner's office basically had a policy of: "We punished them (Patriots), but there will be much stiffer penalties in the future for any one else, or the Patriots if this happens again.

Why did they destroy everything? Endless rehashing, and punishment that would ruin the bottom line and a season.

Here's the question that was probably posed in the offices for The NFL as a whole:

Do you really want to know how bad they cheated, and for how long?

Finding-out would've killed the season this year = Bad for everyone's "bottom line$".

It would've been an investigation like no other in sports during a season.

I laughed when some suggested that "The Patriots should be suspended for a season." An entire franchise's games don't count? :D:D:D I knew that The NFL would never do that..

Plus, the 5 basic media who broadcast games would have to recoup lost revenue by actually investigating the cheating on their own, and sensationalizing it for hire ratings. Their would be nothing else in football to discuss (like Steriods in MLBaseball) The whole industry just feeds on itself this season. Of course, The NFL would not smile on this move ("Remember what happened to The ESPN Football Drama, "Playmakers?"). So, everyone from analysts, on-air personalities, to officials all say that it doesn't count, and don't ask questions about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...