Jump to content

U.S. Finds Iran Halted Its Nuclear Arms Effort in 2003


Recommended Posts

U.S. Finds Iran Halted Its Nuclear Arms Effort in 2003

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 A new assessment by American intelligence agencies released Monday concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains frozen, contradicting a judgment two years ago that Tehran was working relentlessly toward building a nuclear bomb.

The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to reshape the final year of the Bush administration, which has made halting Iran s nuclear program a cornerstone of its foreign policy.

The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran is likely to keep its options open with respect to building a weapon, but that intelligence agencies do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran is continuing to produce enriched uranium, a program that the Tehran government has said is intended for civilian purposes. The new estimate says that the enrichment program could still provide Iran with enough raw material to produce a nuclear weapon sometime by the middle of next decade, a timetable essentially unchanged from previous estimates.

But the new report essentially disavows a judgment that the intelligence agencies issued in 2005, which concluded that Iran had an active secret arms program intended to transform the raw material into a nuclear weapon. The new estimate declares instead with high confidence that the military-run program was shut in 2003, and it concludes with moderate confidence that the program remains frozen. The report judges that the halt was imposed by Iran primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure.

It was not clear what prompted the reversal. Administration officials said the new estimate reflected conclusions that the intelligence agencies had agreed on only in the past several weeks. The report s agnosticism about Iran s nuclear intentions represents a very different tone than had been struck by President Bush, and by Vice President **** Cheney, who warned in a speech in October that if Iran stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences.

The estimate does not say when intelligence agencies learned that the arms program had been halted, but officials said new information obtained from covert sources over the summer had led to a reassessment of the state of Iran s nuclear program and a decision to delay preparation of the estimate, which had been scheduled to be delivered to Congress in the spring.

The new report came out just over five years after a 2002 intelligence estimate on Iraq concluded that it possessed chemical and biological weapons programs and was determined to restart its nuclear program. That estimate was instrumental in winning the Congressional authorization for a military invasion of Iraq, but it proved to be deeply flawed, and most of its conclusions turned out to be wrong.

Intelligence officials said the specter of the 2002 estimate on Iraq hung over their deliberations on Iran even more than it had in 2005, when the lessons from the intelligence failure on Iraq were just beginning to prompt spy agencies to adapt a more rigorous approach to their findings.

The 2007 report on Iran had been requested by members of Congress, underscoring that any conclusions could affect American policy toward Iran at a delicate time. The new estimate brought American assessments more in line with the judgments of international arms inspectors.

Last month, Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, reported that Iran was operating 3,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges capable of producing fissile material for nuclear weapons, but he said inspectors had been unable to determine whether the Iranian program sought only to generate electricity or to also to build weapons.

Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and the Senate majority leader, portrayed the assessment as directly challenging some of this administration s alarming rhetoric about the threat posed by Iran and called for enhanced diplomatic efforts toward Tehran. Democratic presidential candidates mostly echoed Senator Reid, but also emphasized that Iran s long-term ambitions were still a great concern to the United States.

In interviews on Monday, some administration officials expressed skepticism about the conclusions reached in the new report, saying they doubted that American intelligence agencies had a firm grasp of the Iranian government s intentions.

The administration officials also said the intelligence findings would not lessen the White House s concern about the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran. The fact that Iran continues to refine its abilities to enrich uranium, they said, means that any decision in the future to restart a nuclear weapons program could lead Iran to a bomb in relatively short order. While the new report does not contrast sharply with earlier assessments about Iran s capabilities, it does make new judgments about the intentions of its government.

Rather than portraying Iran as a rogue, irrational country determined to join the club of nations that possess a nuclear bomb, the estimate says Iran s decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and military costs.

The administration called new attention to the threat posed by Iran this year when Mr. Bush suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to World War III. Mr. Cheney also said that month that as Iran continued to enrich uranium, the end of that process will be the development of nuclear weapons.

Yet even as Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were making those statements, analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency were well under way toward revising the earlier assessment about Iran s nuclear arms program. Administration officials said the White House had known at the time that the conclusions about Iran were under review but had not been informed until more recently that intelligence agencies had reversed their 2005 conclusion.

In September, officials said, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the C.I.A. director, and his deputy, Stephen R. Kappes, met with Iran analysts to take a hard look at past conclusions about Iran s nuclear program in light of new information obtained since 2005.

We felt that we needed to scrub all the assessments and sources to make sure we weren t misleading ourselves, said one senior intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The estimate concludes that if Iran were to restart its arms program, it would still be at least two years before it would have enough highly enriched uranium to produce a nuclear bomb. But it says it is still very unlikely Iran could produce enough of the material by then.

Instead, the report released on Monday concludes that it is more likely that Iran could have a bomb by the early part to the middle of the next decade. The report states that the State Department s Bureau of Intelligence and Research judges that Iran is unlikely to achieve this goal before 2013, because of foreseeable technical and programmatic problems.

The estimate concludes that it would be difficult to persuade Iran s leaders to abandon all efforts to get nuclear weapons, given the importance of getting the bomb to Iran s strategic goals in the Middle East.

Intelligence officials presented the outlines of the intelligence estimate two weeks ago to several cabinet members, along with Mr. Cheney. During the meeting, officials said, policy makers challenged and debated the conclusions. The final draft of the estimate was presented to Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney last Wednesday.

Officials said they now planned to give extensive briefings to American allies like Israel, Britain and France. Israel intelligence officials for years have put forward more urgent warnings about Iran s nuclear abilities than their American counterparts, positing that Iran could get a nuclear bomb this decade.

Intelligence officials had said just weeks ago they were ending the practice of declassifying parts of intelligence estimates, citing concerns that analysts might alter their judgments if they knew the reports would be widely publicized.

But in a statement on Monday, Donald M. Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, said that since the new estimate was at odds with the 2005 assessment and thus at odds with public statements by top officials about Iran we felt it was important to release this information to ensure that an accurate presentation is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff. I wonder how many years before the Bush Doctrine supporters also accept that Iraq had no WMDs? Do we as a nation have a shred of credibility left in the eyes of the world at large? It's not even fun to trash Bush any more. He has been a complete unmitigated disaster and we re-elected him! So, who is actually more stupid...Bush or us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

firstngoal (12/4/2007)
So Iran halted its nuclear bomb program. Okay Batman, explain to me why they now have 3,000 centrifuges on line enriching uranium!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Apparently you did not read down far enough.

Iran is continuing to produce enriched uranium, a program that the Tehran government has said is intended for civilian purposes. The new estimate says that the enrichment program could still provide Iran with enough raw material to produce a nuclear weapon sometime by the middle of next decade, a timetable essentially unchanged from previous estimates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Info from Iranian officers fed U.S. change in nuke assessment

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iranian military officers' notes and conversations intercepted by the United States played a significant role in the new U.S. assessment of Iran's nuclear weapons plans, officials told CNN.

One senior official said there was no "Wow, we have it!" moment -- that it was a "continuous PIRATED VIDEO IS ILLEGAL" of information that led analysts to go back and "scrub" old information. Another senior official said there was no "single strand of anything" that produced the change in the assessment.

In the National Intelligence Estimate released on Monday, the U.S. intelligence community dramatically reversed course, going from "high confidence" two years ago that the Islamic Republic was working toward nuclear weapons to a new assessment -- also with "high confidence" -- that Iran stopped its weapons program in 2003.

The new information came from a variety of areas, including human sources, intercepted communications, and materials available to the public, according to government officials familiar with the NIE.

In particular, the United States came into possession of notes from Iranian military officers, an intelligence official and a senior military official told CNN.

In addition, two intelligence officials told CNN the National Security Agency intercepted discussions among senior Iranian military officers about the lack of a nuclear program.

Publicly available material that factored into the new assessment included a 2005 press tour of Iran's Natanz centrifuge facility. "We actually ended up with photography of all of the equipment there. ... We actually had data," an official said.

Some of the new information challenged previous conclusions and helped illuminate old data. For example, newly acquired data helped analysts understand the significance of data obtained in 2004 from an Iranian computer that included documents and diagrams related to nuclear warhead designs.

One government official said there was also more rigorous analysis. The analysts worked "hand in hand" with spies and had a much better idea about the sources of the information than they did about the sources of the now-discredited 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

That hastily prepared NIE -- used to justify the March 2003 invasion -- concluded Iraq had active weapons of mass destruction programs, but no evidence of such programs has ever been discovered. One senior intelligence official said the current analytical process was "much more robust" as a result of the 2002 experience.

The NIE released this week was almost ready for release in the spring of 2007, drawing conclusions very similar to the 2005 version of the NIE, officials said. CNN was told in July that new information had delayed the anticipated release, and Director of National Security Mike McConnell indicated last month that new information started coming in as work on the estimate was coming to a close.

Officials told CNN that, armed with the new data, analysts went back and "scrubbed" their assumptions and inferences. Groups known as "red teams" were formed to present alternative viewpoints and challenge earlier assessments. Counterintelligence officers reviewed the data for evidence of any disinformation or strategic deception on Iran's part to conceal its program.

In the end, after discussions described as "spirited," the analysts concluded with high confidence that the Iranians had ended their nuclear weapons program.

But senior intelligence officials had to be convinced. One of those officials indicated CIA Director Michael Hayden and his deputy, Steve Kappas, brought together the analysts who were drafting the NIE about four to six weeks ago.

"It was kind of a show-me," the official said. "We were a skeptical audience."

Another senior intelligence official called Iran "probably the hardest intelligence target there is," suggesting it is even more difficult than North Korea. The official said Iran "deliberately, carefully and for some period of time effectively kept hidden" its nuclear weapons program.

Questions have also been raised about whether President Bush was aware of the change in assessment before his comment in October suggesting Iran still had an active weapons program.

At a news conference Tuesday, Bush said McConnell told him in August that there was new information on Iran, but didn't tell him what it was. The president said he was briefed last week on the key judgments of the completed NIE.

But White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Wednesday that McConnell told Bush during the summer that Iran "may have suspended" its nuclear weapons program, but that analysts needed more time to study new data before they came to a conclusion.

The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-West Virginia, said Tuesday that both he and the committee's vice chairman, Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri, were given information on Iran several months ago but were not told of any final conclusions.

"I have to believe that [bush] knew what was going on before Vice Chairman Bond and I did," Rockefeller told PBS's "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer."

Senior intelligence officials admit there are still gaps in what they know about Iran's nuclear weapons program. But they insist better analysis and new information that was not known at the time of the 2005 assessment are what led to the about-face in the new NIE. E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

CNN's Barbara Starr and Ed Henry contributed to this report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...