pit&atlfan81 Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 thorughout his career at michigan. he's a 4-yr.starter who has been very consistent.he's tough as nails, is a leader, and has a mean streak in him. he's a winner, and can make all the throws, including the deep ones that are important in petrino's offense.here are his career stats:yr. comp. att. yds. comp% ypa long td intsack rating2004 240 399 2743 60.2 6.88 69 25 12 29 132.56 2005 223 382 2526 58.4 6.61 54 23 8 21 129.61 2006 203 328 2508 61.9 7.65 69 22 8 24 143.37 2007 105 167 1258 62.9 7.53 46 10 5 8 139.92 as of now, that's 80 td's to 33 int's. and aside from his sophomore year, he has had over a 60 % comp. %. he doesn't throw a lot of picks. and his ypa is pretty good. plus, michigan has run a pro-style offense for years, that's always a +. if we can't get ryan or brohm this is the guy i want and he'll probably be there in the late 2nd or 3rd considering we address o-line first and foremost at the top of the draft.as long qb is a first day pick, i'm happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 insert same thing i said in pf here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deacon 13 Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 i think its because he hasn't performed all that well in his biggest games. i wouldn't be against picking him up, but it would have to be in rnd 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pit&atlfan81 Posted October 23, 2007 Author Share Posted October 23, 2007 i think its because he hasn't performed all that well in his biggest games. i wouldn't be against picking him up, but it would have to be in rnd 4.i don't think that's entirely true.and he won't be there in rd.4. he'll go somewhere in the 3rd.and he's better then dixon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pit&atlfan81 Posted October 24, 2007 Author Share Posted October 24, 2007 bump! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLBrave Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 it's like you being against dennis dixon. people have their guys, and will think what they want. henne is a solid qb, but he seems to be more of a game manager then a game changer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Offseason Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 it's like you being against dennis dixon. people have their guys, and will think what they want. henne is a solid qb, but he seems to be more of a game manager then a game changer.not to mention he always has big play guys to throw to. without braylon edwards and mario manningham this guy would be nothing, and with a very good offensive line and running game, this guy has it easy.i dont know much about his leadership, but when i watch him i am unimpressed. michigan loses most every big game they play, and a lot of that responsibility has to fall on the qb. especially when they collapse in one of the biggest upsets ever (before usc and stanford). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLBrave Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 not to mention he always has big play guys to throw to. without braylon edwards and mario manningham this guy would be nothing, and with a very good offensive line and running game, this guy has it easy.i dont know much about his leadership, but when i watch him i am unimpressed. michigan loses most every big game they play, and a lot of that responsibility has to fall on the qb. especially when they collapse in one of the biggest upsets ever (before usc and stanford).exactly. he's been the beneficiary of -great- talent around him, on both sides of the ball. hart is a sleeper in this draft, and could turn out to be a very productive pro, and edwards is arguably one the top 10 wrs in the league. manningham, although he juggles the ball like a circus clown, is a very good receiver and makes big plays by himself. as for the app. state vs um thing, that is still the biggest upset ever. stanford is a somewhat improving program (######, they didn't have anywhere to go but up), and sc is a tad bit overrated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Offseason Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 we could debate about the mich-app state game vs the stanford usc game, but i dont really care. they were both huge upsets.the point is, you are dead on. i like hart, he is extremely consistent and has great leg drive and runs downhill and with power. and another plus, he never fumbles. there is a very impressive stat attatched to that but i cant remember it so i wont butcher it trying to make it up.for the people who really like henne, what is your opinion on all of this? i dont think hed have a chance in **** at going 1st day without all the talent around him, so why would we pick him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLBrave Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 we could debate about the mich-app state game vs the stanford usc game, but i dont really care. they were both huge upsets.the point is, you are dead on. i like hart, he is extremely consistent and has great leg drive and runs downhill and with power. and another plus, he never fumbles. there is a very impressive stat attatched to that but i cant remember it so i wont butcher it trying to make it up.for the people who really like henne, what is your opinion on all of this? i dont think hed have a chance in **** at going 1st day without all the talent around him, so why would we pick him? i agree, they were both huge upsets. i'm a michigan state fan, so i can't help but laugh after that game. here's how many fumbles hart has:hart has lost a fumble only one time, against iowa on september 25, 2004, in 1,016 total touches fumbles (it's wikipedia, but who cares ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pit&atlfan81 Posted October 24, 2007 Author Share Posted October 24, 2007 it's like you being against dennis dixon. people have their guys, and will think what they want. henne is a solid qb, but he seems to be more of a game manager then a game changer.disagree.not to mention he always has big play guys to throw to. without braylon edwards and mario manningham this guy would be nothing, and with a very good offensive line and running game, this guy has it easy.i dont know much about his leadership, but when i watch him i am unimpressed. michigan loses most every big game they play, and a lot of that responsibility has to fall on the qb. especially when they collapse in one of the biggest upsets ever (before usc and stanford).he has very good leadership, he's tough as nails. and he runs a pro-style offense, unlike dixon. and can make all the throws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.