fal-kin Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 we dont have a shot with this bonehead donatell calling deep zone every down and gruden calling screen passes all day!btw- this is the only garcia that was ever worth a dam.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratedownsth Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 we dont have a shot with this bonehead donatell calling deep zone every down and gruden calling screen passes all day!btw- this is the only garcia that was ever worth a dam..expect a heavy dose of graham, and pittman, and although the screen is used some, the bucs don't run many.should be plenty of film on the falcons o now, and what a great time to get a bye. just hope garcia stays healthy this year, if not he goes home to that fine azz wife, so win-win for that dude either way . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 expect a heavy dose of graham, and pittman, and although the screen is used some, the bucs don't run many.should be plenty of film on the falcons o now, and what a great time to get a bye. just hope garcia stays healthy this year, if not he goes home to that fine azz wife, so win-win for that dude either way .and don't forget about our new burner, bennett. gonna be a long day for the birdies. i'm going to enjoy crushing their "playoff" aspirations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdc1963 Posted November 15, 2007 Share Posted November 15, 2007 donatell? alright i get ya...was it over when the germans bombed pearl harbour? exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tampa2 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 you mean kiffin usually beats the falcons.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 you mean kiffin usually beats the falcons.. lolyeah pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 you mean kiffin usually beats the falcons.. lolif that's not a statement of truth i don't know what is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marinetildeath Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 well, i guess last year was unsual and not a true statement! 14-3...17-6that'll keep'em quite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 that'll keep'em quiteright. the score of those games was pathetic as for how lopsided the games actually were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonSen88 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 right. the score of those games was pathetic as for how lopsided the games actually were.you're right, it's not indicative of how lopsided the games actually were. especially considering we doubled your red zone appearences, missed 5 field goals, set a rushing record, and beat you by two touchdowns (twice). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 you're right, it's not indicative of how lopsided the games actually were. especially considering we doubled your red zone appearences, missed 5 field goals, set a rushing record, and beat you by two touchdowns (twice).two touchdowns = 12 points. you beat us by a touchdown, a 2 point conversion, and a field goal in each game. not two touchdowns. but whatever makes you feel best!this is what i was saying it said more about both teams inability to put the ball in the end-zone than anything else. the games should of been 30-40 points to whatever we scored. they weren't. it was pathetic on both accounts. if we could of scored more than 11 points in either game we would of won. and if i recall correctly one of them should of been more like a 4 point differential, due to the fact that a brooks td was reversed on a ###### call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonSen88 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 two touchdowns = 12 points. you beat us by a touchdown, a 2 point conversion, and a field goal in each game. not two touchdowns. but whatever makes you feel best!this is what i was saying it said more about both teams inability to put the ball in the end-zone than anything else. the games should of been 30-40 points to whatever we scored. they weren't. it was pathetic on both accounts. if we could of scored more than 11 points in either game we would of won. and if i recall correctly one of them should of been more like a 4 point differential, due to the fact that a brooks td was reversed on a ###### call.sorry for short changing ya'. if you scored 11 points in either game? if we'd score 6 points in both game from 2005 we'd have been division champions or at least in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 sorry for short changing ya'. if you scored 11 points in either game? if we'd score 6 points in both game from 2005 we'd have been division champions or at least in the playoffs.i assume you know the essentials of football. i was worried for a second that you didn't, calling a 17 to 6 game a 2 touchdown win. that just goes to show how truly pathetic the game was. the bucs couldn't muster more than 3 and 6 points, and the falcons, despite rushing for over 300 yards in one game, couldn't score more than 17 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonSen88 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 i assume you know the essentials of football. i was worried for a second that you didn't, calling a 17 to 6 game a 2 touchdown win. that just goes to show how truly pathetic the game was. the bucs couldn't muster more than 3 and 6 points, and the falcons, despite rushing for over 300 yards in one game, couldn't score more than 17 points.i knew we scored 2 touchdowns both times, and that's what stuck. the games were boring, but a falcons win makes it exciting and winning by double-digits both times makes it even sweeter. we did rush for over 300 yards, but we missed 4 field goals. if the kicker does his job, that results in 26 net points which concludes a 26-3 victory or 26-10 (with brooks' touchdown). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 i knew we scored 2 touchdowns both times, and that's what stuck. the games were boring, but a falcons win makes it exciting and winning by double-digits both times makes it even sweeter. we did rush for over 300 yards, but we missed 4 field goals. if the kicker does his job, that results in 26 net points which concludes a 26-3 victory or 26-10 (with brooks' touchdown).you wont hear me deny that each game was an ###### whooping that i hope to forget in the near future.my sole comfort that first game was that the bucs were going to get their first win. boy was i wrong.the second game i just resigned wasn't ours.and i hope i don't have to deal with another sweep by the dirty birds in the near future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tampa2 Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 bump.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishbuc Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 WhenFalconsWin (11/16/2007)well, i guess last year was unsual and not a true statement!How you guys scored 14 and 17 points and still won was pathetic.An average offensive outing by Garcia would have beaten you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts